Is Obama Protecting ISIS? New Shocking Report Raises Serious Questions Of Treason
Anyone in the military will tell you Obama is more than just “cautious” when it comes to ISIS. He refuses to attack the terrorist group head on, and instead chooses to “lead from behind”. New reports just surfaced, however, that say he isn’t even doing that. Sources say Obama is leading our allies away from ISIS, not leading an effort to fight them.
Oliver North has been a trusted source when it comes to military action in this administration. He is the former deputy-director of the National Security Council and a recipient of the Silver Star and Purple Heart.
He revealed on Fox news news tonight that the Egyptian government asked the US for information on ISIS targets in Libya yesterday after ISIS beheaded 21 Christians.
But, the Obama Administration refused the request. The Obama administration also refused to give Jordan information on ISIS targets in Syria after their pilot was burned alive in a cage.
“President El Sisi asked for American intelligence targeting intelligence before today’s strikes and didn’t get it. King Abdullah of Jordan asked for Intelligence data on targets to respond to the murder of a Jordanian aircraft pilot.
The Kurds are begging for arms and ammo from the United States, not one bullet has been delivered by the United States.”
Why would a president claim to want to “destroy” ISIS , but REFUSE requests from allies who are eager and ready to commit that destruction?
If we know where the targets are, why would we refuse to give them up?
The airstrikes he has ordered so far are said to be doing very little against ISIS.
Some even claim we are only striking empty buildings. Why would our president want to mitigate the damages done to our enemy?
These are serious questions we need to be asking, and we need answers now.
No comments:
Post a Comment