PAT BUCHANAN: WILL THERE ALWAYS BE AN ENGLAND?

THE BREXIT VOTE

WILL THERE ALWAYS BE AN ENGLAND?

Pat Buchanan: 'Across Europe, the tribalists are rejecting, in a word, diversity'

In his op-ed in the Washington Post, Chris Grayling, leader of the House of Commons, made the case for British withdrawal from the European Union – in terms Americans can understand.

Would you accept, Grayling asks, an American Union of North and South America, its parliament sitting in Panama, with power to impose laws on the United States, and a high court whose decisions overruled those of the U.S. Supreme Court?

Would you accept an American Union that granted all the peoples of Central and South America and Mexico the right to move to, work in, and live in any U.S. state or city, and receive all the taxpayer-provided benefits that U.S. citizens receive?

This is what we are subjected to under the EU, said Grayling.

And as you Americans would never cede your sovereignty or independence to such an overlord regime, why should we?

Downing Street’s reply: Prime Minister David Cameron says leaving the EU could cost Britain a lot of money and a loss of influence in Brussels.

The heart versus the wallet. Freedom versus security.

While Barack Obama, Cameron and Angela Merkel are pulling for Britain to vote to remain in the EU, across Europe, transnationalism is in retreat, and tribalism is rising.

As Britain’s Independence Party and half the Tory Party seek to secede from the EU, the Scottish National Party is preparing a new referendum to bring about Scotland’s secession.

The strongest party in France is the National Front of Marine Le Pen. In Austria’s presidential election, Norbert Hofer of Jorg Haider’s Freedom Party came within an eyelash of becoming the first European nationalist head of state since World War II.

The Euroskeptic Law and Justice Party is in power in Warsaw, as is the Fidesz Party of Viktor Orban in Budapest and the Swiss People’s Party in Bern. The right-wing Sweden Democrats and Danish People’s Party are growing stronger.

In 2015, Merkel, Time’s Person of the Year, admitted a million Middle East refugees. This year, Merkel flipped and paid a huge bribe to Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan to keep Syrian refugees from crossing the Aegean to the Greek islands and thence into Europe.

In Germany, too, nationalism is resurgent as opposition grows to any new bailouts of the La Dolce Vita nations of Club Med. The populist AfD party has made major strides in German state elections.

While the rightist parties in power and reaching for power are anti-EU, anti-Islamic and anti-immigrant, the secessionist movements roiling Scotland, Spain, Belgium and Italy seek rather the breakup of the old nations of Europe along ethnonational lines.

By enlisting in these parties of the right, what are the peoples of Europe recoiling from and rebelling against? Answer: The beau ideal of progressives – societies and nations that are multiracial, multiethnic, multicultural and multilingual.

Across Europe, the tribalists are rejecting, in a word, diversity.

And what are they seeking?

God-and-country, blood-and-soil people, they want to live with their own kinfolk, their own kind. They do not believe in economics uber alles. And if democracy will not deliver the kind of country and society they wish to live in, then democracy must be trumped by direct action, by secession.

This is the spirit behind Brexit.

The is the spirit that drove the Irish patriots of 1919, who rose against British rule, though they were departing the greatest empire on earth in its moment of supreme glory after the Great War, to begin life among the smallest and poorest countries in all of Europe.

What is happening in Europe today was predictable and predicted.

At the turn of the century, in “The Death of the West,” I wrote:

“Europe has begun to die. The prognosis is grim. Between 2000 and 2050, world population will grow by more than 3 billion to over 9 billion people, but this 50 percent increase in population will come entirely in Asia, Africa and Latin America, as one hundred million people of European stock vanish from the earth.”

Europeans are vanishing, as the peoples of the Maghreb and Middle East, South Asia and the sub-Sahara come to fill the empty spaces left by aging and dying Europeans whose nations once ruled them.

Absent the restoration of border controls across Europe, and warships on permanent station in the Med, can the inexorable invasion be stopped? Or is “The Camp of the Saints” the future of Europe?

An open question. But if the West is to survive as the unique civilization it has been, its nations must re-assume control of their destinies and control of their borders.

Britain ought not to go gentle into that good night the EU has prepared for her. And a great leap to freedom can be taken June 23.

Trooping to the polls, the cousins might recall the words of Vera Lynn, 76 years ago, as the Battle of Britain was engaged:

There’ll always be an England,
And England shall be free,
If England means as much to you
As England means to me.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/will-there-always-be-an-england/#SOKCO6G5GBSIMzSO.99

My comments: The godless, Socialist, Secular Humanists of Britain and Europe have taken Britain and Europe down the Path to RUIN before the Living God. This is Exactly what Obama, Hillary, the Democrats and the like want to do to America. They are Preparing the Way for the son of Satan, the Beast of Revelation, the Antichrist. Unfortunately, the Word of God says that they Succeed and that this is GOD'S POWERFUL DELUSION for those who refuse to love the TRUTH. (2 Thessalonians 2:9-12)  

BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS

JESUS WOULD BE BANNED FROM COLLEGES TODAY, SAYS PROF

'This is a real threat to free speech and one we have to fight back against'

Published: 8 mins ago

(TELEGRAPH) — Jesus Christ would be banned from preaching on university campuses if he were alive today, after Britain became “too feeble” at standing up for free speech, a leading Oxford professor has said.

Professor Timothy Garton Ash, professor of European Studies at Oxford University, said the trend for “so-called safe spaces” had led to free speech being eroded from all sides, with even students insisting on shutting one another’s opinions down.

Warning universities must “hold the line” against the “salami slicing” of free speech, he said it was time for the public to stand up against creeping legislation and self-censorship.

Read the full story ›

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/jesus-would-be-banned-from-colleges-today-says-prof/#C0kZMWOMtmYCFZdq.99

THE 44TH PRESIDENT

OBAMA'S LEGACY: DECEIT AND DECONSTRUCTION

Exclusive: Mychal Massie offers end-of-term analysis a few months early

I had planned to wait until the last day Obama was in office to write this, but with him genuflecting, groveling and implying that America “is as bad” as the Imperial Japanese, I decided not to wait. After all, January 2017 is only a few months away, which means there is plenty of time for him to further disgrace the position he unworthily holds.

When Obama leaves office historical revisionists will hail him as having healed diabetes, ended starvation and received a new set of commandments while having coffee on Mount Sinai. The reality is that he has increased the disease neo-Leninism, racial animus, and he received his commandments from Erebus.

He will be heralded as the “first color” in the White House, blah-blah-blah. But no matter how hard they try, there are those pesky little things called facts.

Obama worshipers will claim that the economy is better; unemployment is lower, so on and so forth. But, even a cursory examination argues to the contrary. Census Bureau data through 2012 show that the median income has continued to decline under Obama.

Boasts of job creation and utilizing what amounts to the “Carbonaro Effect” of magic accounting and employment reporting notwithstanding, there are 94 million Americans now permanently unemployed under Obama. “Approximately 52.2 million (21.3 percent) people in the U.S. participated in major means-tested government assistance programs each month in 2012,” according to a report issued by the Census Bureau. Note also that, not including generational welfare recipients, “The majority of [welfare] beneficiaries [under Obama] are dependent on the programs for up to four years, the Census found.”

What goes unaddressed is that the majority of jobs created under Obama are low-paying jobs and seasonal jobs. It’s also important to note that with the increasing numbers of illegal aliens and so-called refugees, those on welfare and government subsidies are going to increase exponentially.

There is also the student loan bubble that’s going to burst with devastating results. John Hayward wrote: “[Obama’s] been doing all that he can to recreate the mortgage bubble, the auto loan bubble is beginning to look ominous, and the student loan bubble may soon burst with a deafening $200 billion pop.” [“Student Loan Bubble Update: Some 40 Percent of Borrowers Aren’t Making Payments,” Breitbart Big Government, April 7, 2016]

Hayward continues: “About 3.6 million, were in default on $56 billion in student debt, meaning they had gone at least a year without making a payment. Three million more owing roughly $66 billion were at least a month behind. … Another three million owing $110 billion were in forbearance … meaning they had received permission to temporarily halt payments.” Those numbers do not include those still in school.

Under Obama, our military veterans are not having their most basic needs attended to. And that is just the tip of the iceberg.

President John Kennedy wanted to put men on the moon and create a space program second to none; Obama dreams of putting men in women’s bathrooms and showers.

President Ronald Reagan restored pride in America at home and around the world. Obama has offended our oldest allies and has made a practice of groveling before reprobate despots. Obama routinely criticizes, and accuses America of being a racist colonializing imperialistic empire that owes its success to others.

Obama’s legacy will be one of lavish vacations, one of taking usufruct to unparalleled levels of extreme, and as having for a wife a bigoted termagant who loves a free ride. His legacy will not only be one of lies and deceit, but it will be one of boasting of his deceit.

Obama threatened insurance companies who warned their business clients that Obamacare would be a costly disaster. Obama himself called those of us who worked to publicize the truth about Obamacare liars who didn’t know what we were talking about.

But after becoming, law, Obamacare’s chief architect admitted the administration had “lied” to the “stupid” American people to get it passed. Obama used aspiring novelist Ben Rhodes to develop a narrative of misleading information, i.e., lies, to blunt criticism and sell the Iran nuclear deal. When Obama was questioned about the price of gasoline midway through his first term, he flippantly told the person they “need to buy a cheaper car.”

He flaunted the fact that he was responsible for putting a thousand new employees out of work by ordering Boeing to shut down its South Carolina factory because it was non-union.

He boasts of a $15 minimum wage for fast-food restaurants but doesn’t mention the forced minimum wage will result in significant job losses. Wendy’s and McDonald’s have already announced that even though they support the minimum-wage increase, they’ll be utilizing robotics and self-serve technology, which will save them money but cost jobs.

Factually, the legacy Obama will leave behind will be one of wasted promises and that he was the “first color” to hold the highest office in America – and that he did more to destroy what America stood for than any president in history.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/obamas-legacy-deceit-and-deconstruction/#buKSgOimYxQQb7bD.99

THE JUBILEE YEAR

IS AMERICA BOUND BY A DIVINE COVENANT?

Exclusive: Ronald Stokes sees significance in Declaration signers dying 50 years later

By Ronald Stokes, author of “America’s Covenant”

In the slavery debate preceding the Civil War, slavery advocates rejected Natural Law arguments that all men are born with equal rights. Abolitionists argued that God endowed equal rights to everyone and that those who violated those rights were sinning. The abolitionists’ argument was consistent with the Declaration of Independence, but was it true? Would God protect rights he endowed when government failed?

Abolitionist John Brown decided the best way to free the slaves was to arm them. He led men who broke into the armory at Harper’s Ferry to steal armaments, but before they could escape, they were surrounded. In a speech given in court after his conviction, John Brown conveyed the moral motivation for his raid:

This court acknowledges, as I suppose, the validity of the law of God. I see a book kissed here which I suppose to be the Bible, or at least the New Testament. That teaches me that all things whatsoever I would that men should do to me, I should do even so to them. It teaches me, further, to “remember them that are in bonds, as bound with them.” I endeavored to act up to that instruction. I say, I am yet too young to understand that God is any respecter of persons.

In light of the moral debate and subsequent devastation, many Northerners considered the Civil War a judgment from God. Julia Ward Howe and traveling companions delayed by passing troops beguiled the time with snatches of army songs. One commemorated the death of John Brown, “John Brown’s body lies a-mouldering in the ground; His soul is marching on.” Rev. Clarke suggested that Howe write more uplifting lyrics to that stirring tune. Howe described how this transpired in her book “Reminiscences: 1819-1899”:

I went to bed that night as usual, and slept, according to my wont, quite soundly. I awoke in the gray of the morning twilight; and as I lay waiting for the dawn, the long lines of the desired poem began to twine themselves in my mind. Having thought out all the stanzas, I said to myself, “I must get up and write these verses down, lest I fall asleep again and forget them.” So, with a sudden effort, I sprang out of bed, and found in the dimness an old stump of a pen which I remembered to have used the day before. I scrawled the verses almost without looking at the paper.

Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord:
He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;
He hath loosed the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword:
His truth is marching on.

Everyone who has sung “The Battle Hymn of the Republic” has proclaimed and rejoiced that the Civil War was an act of divine judgment.

Ronald Stokes’ “America’s Covenant” makes the compelling case that the nation’s founders broke their pledge of 1776, bring divine judgment – a fascinating look at the history the United States

Lincoln made this point in his second inaugural address:

Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

The idea that the nation was judged for national sins is an Old Covenant mindset in which sins are clearly defined, blessings promised for compliance and curses threatened for disobedience. The United States is not a party to that covenant. Nevertheless, for the Civil War to be a judgment over slavery there must be a covenant. Abolitionists correctly interpreted the clear implication of God-endowed rights but missed an even more important and profound consequence of a subsequent passage in the Declaration.

The final sentence of the Declaration holds the key to perceiving it as a covenant. “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.” This sentence is far more than verbal flourish announcing the termination of the document. The word, “pledge,” is covenant language. 

In exchange for the protection of Divine Providence during the Revolutionary War, it promised that the colonies would form a government based upon the principles delineated previously. Colonists vowed to forfeit their lives, fortunes and sacred honor if they failed to implement a government securing delineated unalienable rights.

Unfortunately, the country was in default. By condoning slavery, the government denied liberty to slaves. God warned the nation of impending peril through an event so astounding as to rival any similar event in human history. The two men most responsible for the Declaration, its author, Thomas Jefferson, and its chief advocate in the debate for ratification, John Adams, died on its 50th anniversary. They were the only two signers to serve as president and had outlived all who voted for ratification. The commonly accepted explanation for these simultaneous deaths is that it was a random occurrence. Could there be another explanation?

God waited 50 years before executing judgment on Adams and Jefferson for covenant violations because the Bible places special significance on the 50th year, calling it the year of jubilee.

“A jubilee shall that fiftieth year be unto you:” (Leviticus 25:11a)

The Bible goes on to explain how the jubilee was to be celebrated.

“And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. …

“And if he be not redeemed in these years, then he shall go out in the year of jubilee, both he, and his children with him.” (Leviticus 25:10, 54)

One of the ways everyone was to hallow the 50th year was to free their slaves. When the 50th year of the United States had come, the slaves were not freed.

The 50th anniversary pointed to God’s commandment to release slaves on the year of Jubilee. God kept Adams and Jefferson alive until this time to warn the country that he held it responsible for securing the right of liberty for everyone, including slaves. It implied that God considered our founding document a covenant.

Undoubtedly, many were focusing on the Constitution as the governing document. Prior to the Civil War, the nation had complied with the Constitution. Beyond dispute, the Constitution did not prohibit slavery. However, the Constitution did not annul the Declaration.

“Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.” (Galatians 3:15)

The Constitution drafters did not have authority to annul the covenant after the colonies received protection from Divine Providence. The warning came in 1826 after the Constitution had been approved, demonstrating that the covenant formed by the Declaration was still active. The verdict rendered by the Civil War required the Constitution be amended to agree with the Declaration indicating the Declaration has greater authority.

---

After graduating from the U.S Air Force Academy and serving 20 years specializing in operations research, Ronald Stokes taught mathematics at Central Washington University and has studied statistics at the Ph.D. level. His new book, “America’s Covenant,” available at the WND Superstore, examines the spiritual implications of the Declaration of Independence.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/is-america-bound-by-a-divine-covenant/#akylfIgkoXstjhMp.99

My comments: Yes, the Civil War was a Judgment on America for the Sin of Slavery. Today, America is in Overt Rebellion agaisnt God and His Word and a Great Judgment of God awaits her. The next God Ordained Judgment will be The Great Tribulation that comes upon not only America but the Entire World, as in the Days of Noah. (Matthew 24:37)

8 REASONS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER HOMESCHOOLING

8 REASONS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER HOMESCHOOLING

No politically motivated lectures about marriage 'equality' or fear-mongering about global warming

Homeschooling reached a remarkable milestone in North Carolina during the 2014-15 school year. With enrollment topping 100,000 students, the Tar Heel State now has more homeschoolers than students in private school.

The trend isn’t limited to North Carolina, either. A recent Florida study pegged homeschooling growth there at nearly 10 percent, and the National Home Education Research Institute estimates it at 2 percent to 8 percent a year nationally. “It’s no longer a fringe movement; homeschooling is mainstream,” said Terry Stoops of the North Carolina-based John Locke Foundation.

The reasons for this trend toward homeschooling abound, according to the e-book “Homeschooling: Fighting for My Children’s Future,” a collection of 26 essays from the pages of PJ Media. Here are eight of them, along with excerpts from the book, that all parents should consider as they weigh how best to educate their children:

1. Parents teach the values, not the state: That means no politically motivated lectures about marriage “equality” or fear-mongering about global warming. Education is focused on the basics – reading, writing, math, science, history – and biblical values are embraced, not scorned.
2. Hands-on learning is encouraged: Formal education doesn’t have to be bound inside a textbook. Homeschoolers have the freedom to learn by doing. Sometimes that even involves fire and explosions, no-noes inside a school. Paula Bolyard expects the next generation of scientists and inventors to include many homeschoolers. “They’re not used to being told: ‘You’re not allowed to do that – it might be dangerous!'” she said.
3. Education is not tied to a schedule: Parents don’t have to get their children excused from school for any reason. They are free to adapt the schedule to the family’s needs or even on a whim. “Homeschool can go with you wherever you roam,” Megan Fox said. “It’s a beautiful thing.”
4. Classes are not segregated by age: Unlike in most public and private schools, homeschoolers interact with people of all ages, including adults. They do not spend six hours a day confined to a room with 30 peers. This helps prepare them for college and the workplace.
5. Parents pick the curricula: One of the common gripes of teachers is that they don’t have enough say over what to teach or how to teach it. Education bureaucrats set the rules; teachers follow them. Parents who teach their children at home can change direction any time the needs of a particular child warrant it.
6. Bullying is not allowed: Sibling rivalry may lead to an occasional conflict, but parents are there to intervene when it does. Bullying at school often goes unnoticed or unpunished – and sometimes leads to suicide. Cyber bullying has amplified the problem. If your child is being bullied in school, homeschooling is a viable, and safer, alternative.
7. Homeschooling improves the family dynamic: Children aren’t cranky and exhausted when they get home after being forced to sit still in a desk most of the day. They “are more influenced by their parents than their peers, and so they naturally enjoy being together, even in the teen years,” Fox said.
8. Homeschoolers excel in education and civic life: They score in the 75th-85th percentile on standardized tests. Three-fourths of them go to college. And they get more involved in their communities and are more likely to vote.

Visit Amazon to download the Kindle edition of “Homeschooling: Fighting for My Children’s Future” to explore other benefits of homeschooling, especially when compared with government-run education.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/8-reasons-you-should-consider-homeschooling/#bObgxbORYXBFahzE.99

PROTECT YOUR KIDS FROM TYRANT, IMMORAL, INDECENT OBAMA

TARGETING THE FAMILY

PROTECT YOUR KIDS FROM TYRANT OBAMA

Exclusive: Dr. James Dobson on bathroom edict: 'Have we gone absolutely mad?'

When I was in the third grade, I raised my hand one day and asked the teacher for permission to “go to the bathroom.” She nodded, and I hurried down the hall to the door designated “Boys.” When I had relieved myself, I headed back in the direction of my homeroom. As bad luck would have it, the doors in the hallway all looked alike, and I opened the wrong one. Two second-grade girls were standing there with their mouths open in disbelief. Then they both screamed and pointed at me. The loudest one said, “You’re in BIG trouble!” The other shouted, “Get out of here!” Sweet kids.

I was mortified beyond belief. I sneaked back into class and looked at the floor, wondering who might have witnessed my unthinkable crime. That was decades ago, but I haven’t forgotten my humiliation. The cardinal rule is that boys and girls never entered each other’s private facilities. Never!

How the world has changed! Who would have believed a day would come during my lifetime when boys could meander into the private sanctuary of girls’ toilets, or that it would someday be a civil right for men to use women’s locker rooms and showers without permission or apology? 

Imagine sex-absorbed junior high boys ogling the bodies of developing pubescent girls or standing beside them in their showers. Have we gone absolutely mad? What ever happened to modesty, safety, and Christian mores?

Did it upset you when the president of the United States ordered every public school in America to open all its bathroom facilities including those that are in use by a member of the opposite sex? 

The president’s order made me furious, and then sick to my stomach. How dare this man do something so audacious and unthinkable! His letter from the White House carried an implied threat to withhold federal money from local schools, which rocked the halls of public education. 

Who is this politician that is spending your hard-earned tax dollars to manipulate school officials, anyway? Who is it that is warping our children? It is Barack Obama, one of the worst presidents in American history, and it is time we stood up and said so!

Obama, acting like a king, is wielding dictatorial powers never envisioned in the law. He is determined to change the way males and females relate to one another, and worse, how children perceive themselves. 

If you are a married man with any gumption, surely you will defend your wife’s privacy and security in restroom facilities. 

Would you remain passive after knowing that a strange-looking man, dressed like a woman, has been peering over toilet cubicles to watch your wife in a private moment? What should be done to the pervert who was using mirrors to watch women and girls in their stalls? If you are a dad, I pray you will protect your little girls from men who walk in unannounced, unzip their pants and urinate in front of them. 

If this had happened 100 years ago, someone might have been shot. Where is today’s manhood? God help us!

(You are probably aware that Target has taken a stand to allow persons who “self-identify” as a man or woman to use the restroom of their choice. In addition to Target Stores, the following retailers have also decided, against the objection of their customers, to create “gender neutral” bathrooms: Starbucks, Ross, Walgreens, Toys “R” Us, and Barnes & Noble. My wife, Shirley, and I will no longer patronize these stores, and I hope millions of others will do likewise.)

Let’s talk more about Barack Obama, who is a tyrant in many ways. 

How dare he assault centuries of modesty and moral beliefs! 

By what authority does he tell parents and school officials what to teach children under their care? 

Christian parents, does this outrageous order violate something deep within your sense of propriety? 

The president has already maneuvered the courts to undermine a 5,000-year-old definition of marriage, after experiencing his infamous epiphany. 

Now he is determined to change Western civilization forever. 

He becomes more reckless and defiant as his second term comes to an end. 

Never has an American president been so absorbed with the use and abuse of power, and unfortunately, he still has seven months to go. What is next?

I grew up respecting the authority and dignity of the nation’s presidents. Each of them was tasked to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to protect our rights as citizens. That is what I was taught. My fourth grade teacher, Mrs. Harris, described for us the three branches of government, and how each division has the authority to restrain the other two according to a principle known as “checks and balances.” It made America unique among nations. 

But, with the complete refusal of the U.S. Congress to restrain the presidency or to curtail a runaway judiciary that is itself drunk with power, “we the people” are victimized by those who steal our freedom. 

Our Founding Fathers would be shocked to learn how the safeguards on our freedom have been abandoned.

My friend Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council recently said he is often asked, “Why is the Obama administration trying to mainstream ‘transgenderism’ and force schools to accommodate students who want to use the bathrooms and locker rooms of the opposite sex?” Tony’s answer gets to the heart of the motive: 

“It’s all part of a radical movement trying to destroy the fact that God created man and woman – and that somehow people can choose what gender they want to be. The ultimate goal is to break down all sexual inhibition and morality – a goal that would result in social chaos.”

This is what influential feminist Dale O’Leary had to say on the issue of gender and its meaning in her publication, “Gender: The Deconstruction of Women: Analysis of the Gender Perspective in Preparation for the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China.” 

She wrote, “Although many people think that men and women are the natural expression of a genetic blueprint, gender is a product of human thought and culture, a social construction that creates the ‘true nature’ of all individuals.”

Do you understand what she was saying? Gender is not determined by your chromosomes. It is a product of culture. If a man thinks like a woman, he IS a woman. Furthermore, if we protect children from social and religious conditioning, people will be free to move into and out of existing gender roles at will. 

Taking that concept to its logical conclusion, the feminists and LGBT activists want to dissolve the traditional roles of mothers and fathers and, in time, eliminate references to wife, husband, son, daughter, sister, brother, manhood, womanhood, boy, girl, masculine and feminine. 

These activists want us to replace age-old terminology with neutral terms, such as significant other, spouse, parent, child and sibling. You’ll see that happening in the near future. 

The bottom line is that they want to destroy human sexuality and take with it the foundation of the family. That is their goal, and they have a president in office who is willing to use his executive authority to force this nonsense on us all.

Clearly, there are serious implications here for mothers and fathers. I urge you to protect your boys and girls from those who are espousing these views. Shield them from gender feminism and from those who would confuse their sexuality. They will be under increasing political pressure in years to come.

It is also important for us as adults to understand our own sexual identities. If we don’t know who we are, our kids will be doubly confused about who they are. Any uncertainty, any ambiguity in that assignment must be seen as damaging not only to our sons and daughters but also to the long-term stability of society itself.

I urge you to base your teachings about sexuality on the Scriptures, which tell us, “God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them” (Genesis 1:27). 

Jesus, who was the first Jewish leader to give dignity and status to women, said, “Haven’t you read … that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,'” and, “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh” (Matthew 19:4-5). 

That is the divine plan. It leaves no doubt that the Creator made not one sex but two, each beautifully crafted to “fit with” and meet the needs of the other. Any effort to teach children differently is certain to produce turmoil in the soul of a child.

We must fight to protect our homes and families from politically correct politicians who would create new entitlements that take away our liberties. There is no time to lose. Our children hang in the balance.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/protect-your-kids-from-tyrant-obama/#ix1bAuugw56QIT3M.99

My comments: Christians must take Dr. Dobson's comments to heart and take a Stand for Chrsit and the Word of God. Obama, Hillary the Democrats and All the godless, Socialist, Secular Humanists are out to Destroy Christianity, as it is All that Stands in their Way of Creating Complete Corruption. They are Preparing the Way for their "god," the son of Satan, the Beast of Revelation, the Antichrist. (Revelation 13)