Heaven Is Our Destination Where We Will Be ONE With The Lord Forever

Today, we are in The Season Of The Last Generation. The Birth Pains that Christ Jesus spoke about are currently under way, including natural and unnatural disasters. They will be ever increasing. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold. Social, economic and political turmoil will be ever increasing, causing people's hearts to be weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the anxieties of life. An apostasy within the Church of God is currently under way. This will all reach a climax with Satan revealing his Antichrist and requiring that everyone worship him; That every one receive his "mark" in order to buy or sell; The new currency of the New World Order, the New Tower of Babel.

Today, it is critical that those who have a heart for God are aware of what God is doing and speaking today. God is opening up His Word like never before in preparation for The Time Of The END. I exhort you to open up your heart and your eyes to see what He is doing and your ears to hear what God is speaking at this time. My prayer is that we will be able to stand before the Son of Man at His appearing, without fault and with great joy. I encourage you to read David Wilkerson's book, America's Last Call at davidwilkersontoday.blogspot.com. Also, Google, Tommy Hicks Prophecy, 1961 for a view of the End Times.

Tom's books include: Called By Christ To Be ONE, The Time Of The END, The Season Of The Last Generation, Worship God In Spirit And In Truth, Daniel And The Time Of The END, and Overcoming The Evil One. They are available at amazon.com. They can also be read without cost by clicking on link: Toms Books.

To receive Christ Jesus as a child by faith is the highest human achievement.

Today, the Bride Of Christ is rising up in every nation in the world! Giving Glory to Her Savior and King, Christ Jesus!
Today, the world is Raging against God, Rushing toward Oblivion! Save yourself from this Corrupt Generation!
Today, America is being ground to powder because of it's SIN against God!

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Monday, April 29, 2024

WHY A DIVIDED NATION CANNOT STAND

 

A Nation can Only Stand,

When its Citizens Agree on Fundamental Values.


For more than 200 years American’s Agreed

That the Values Prescribed in the Word of God,

Were Correct.


Today, that is No Longer the Case,

The Left has Brought Forth,

A Different Set of Values,

That Contradict the Word of God.


This has Brought Americans

Into Conflict with Each Other.

And there is No Way

To Bring these Two Different Sets of Values

Into Agreement.


They are Inherently in Conflict,

Hence, we have a Divided Nation.


So, the Conflict Continues,

Each Side Pitted Against the Other;

Each side Attempting to Gain the Upper Hand.


Meanwhile, the Nation Deteriorates

In Every Aspect.


If this Continues,

The Nation will be Completely Destroyed.


AMERICAN SCHOOLS, MARXIST INDOCTRINATION CENTERS

 

American schools have become Marxist indoctrination centers where feelings, not facts, define reality. 

They no longer teach civics and American history; they teach revisionist critical race theory to, as Saul Alinsky said, "rub raw the resentments" and create social chaos. 

Revisionism is the reinterpretation of history and historical events, including reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved in those events. 

The fiction of critical race theory is taught as fact, to actively raise student consciousness of their respective roles as white oppressor and black oppressed

The political goal is to create racial divisiveness and break down our shared national identity as Americans.

© Linda Goudsmit

https://www.renewamerica.com/columns/goudsmit/240429

Ideological Invasion

 CHAPTER 16: Ideological Invasion

Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier—Reality Is (Forthcoming release June 2024)
FacebookTwitter
By Linda Goudsmit
April 29, 2024

Globalism is a replacement ideology that seeks to reorder the world into one singular, planetary Unistate, ruled by the globalist elite. 

The globalist war on nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. 

The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. 

The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of objective reality into the madness of subjective reality. America's children are the primary target of the globalist predators.

The Frankfurt School (Chapters 11 and 15) is best understood as a philosophical and sociological movement that spread through Western universities around the world. 

Instead of embracing individualism and the separation of powers that distinguish our constitutional republic, Frankfurt School émigrés continued to advance their collectivist ideology with religious fanaticism, missionary zeal, and the hubris characteristic of supremacist ideologues.

The movement began with Hungarian Marxist philosopher George Lukács (1885–1971), minister of culture in Bolshevik Hungary in 1919. 

Before the Bolsheviks came to power, Hungary was a Catholic nation. 

Lukács recognized the necessity of collapsing the traditional nuclear family in Marxist revolutions, following Lenin's dictum, "Destroy the family, you destroy the country."

As deputy commissar for education and culture, Lukács targeted Hungary's family unit and its traditional sexual morals. 

He implemented a program called cultural terrorism, which had two tactical objectives. 

First, target children's minds through lectures that encouraged them to ridicule and reject Christian ethics. 

Second, groom them with graphic sexual content and instruction in free love and sexual intercourse. 

People in Hungary were so enraged it forced Lukács to flee the country.

Lukács met Felix Weil, a wealthy German Marxist, at a Marxist study week in Frankfurt in 1923. 

Together, they set up the Institute for Social Research at the Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany. 

Weil's doctoral thesis explored the practical problems of implementing socialism, and he was very interested in Lukács's new cultural approach to Marxism.

Under the direction of radical German philosopher Max Horkheimer, the psychological theories of Sigmund Freud and sociological theories of Karl Marx were integrated, and the Institute for Social Research gave birth to a new species of Marxism. 

Cultural Marxism presented the novel theory that society was psychologically oppressed by the institutions of Western culture. 

This new type of Marxism required a new methodology for implementation.

Jeff Carlson, some of whose articles are discussed in Chapter 15, described the method and the methodology in his February 2017 article "Gramsci, Alinsky & the Left:" [1]

    The Frankfurt School employed a technique invented by Horkheimer called Critical Theory—a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole. The point of the theory is to criticize every traditional social institution—and to specifically avoid offering any alternatives—as a means to breaking down Western Culture. A better, alternative way is never to be offered—only criticism. While at Columbia, the Frankfurt School shifted [its] focus from Critical Theory directed at German society to Critical Theory directed at American society.

Horkheimer defined the difference in method between social/scientific theories and critical social theories. 

Social/scientific theories rely on objective reality and the distinction between theory and practice. 

Critical Theory merges theory and practice, rejects objective reality (facts), and defines itself as a method—a continuous process for change that relies on subjective reality (feelings) and denies any unequivocal knowledge. 

Critical Theory is a derivative of Hegel's dialectic for social change:

    Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis

Horkheimer viewed Critical Theory as the operating system for changing society as a whole. 

It is the "fundamental change" promised by American Marxist president Barack Obama. 

The idea was to actively criticize every facet of Western civilization, destabilize its infrastructure of objective truth and reality, collapse society from within, and replace the established Judeo-Christian morality and capitalist economic system with socialism.

In 1933 the Nazis closed the Institute, and the Institute moved its operations to the United States. 

It reopened in New York at Columbia University in 1935, and came to be known as the Frankfurt School, a school of thought synonymous with Critical Theory.

The Frankfurt School and its Marxist theoreticians trained their sights on America, and like a viral infection, their ideas and theories spread throughout the host country. 

The ideological objective was to erase the existing American social structures and replace them with Marxist notions of Utopia, where universal egalitarianism would be realized. 

The tactical strategy was Critical Theory.

When the Institute for Social Research reopened in Frankfurt in 1951, its influence and many of its theoreticians remained in America. 

Over several decades, the Critical Theory methodology has divided and mutated into critical pedagogy, critical legal theory, critical race theory, critical feminist theory, critical gender theory, and on and on and on, in its never-ending goal of fundamental transformation and societal collapse on the way to the ultimate goal of entirely replacing the existing ideology and social structure.

Changing the hearts and minds of a nation's citizens is a daunting, long-term task. 

Cultural Marxists understood from the beginning that seismic educational reform was required because children live what they learn, and children are the future of every society on Earth. 

The Culture War is revolution without bullets that began in universities and wended its way all the way down the educational ladder to preschools.

Progressive education remains the weapon of choice for Cultural Marxists. Its hero, another Frankfurt School Marxist, Paulo Freire, was a Brazilian political reformer. 

Freire's book Pedagogy of the Oppressed [2] is a reference manual for radical leftist educators today.

Freire's specialty was applying Marx's oppressor/oppressed divide to education. 

His theory of critical pedagogy argues that education cannot be separated from politics and that the rightful goal of education is emancipation from oppression through the awakening of critical consciousness

Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy is a derivative of Critical Theory, which advocates criticizing and dismantling every aspect of traditional American education in both form and content. 

Its planned demolition includes rejecting literacy, foundational skills, and foundational knowledge; eliminating meritocracy, fairness, and equal treatment; and replacing traditional education with Outcome-Based Education and anti-American indoctrination through curriculum content. 

The Hegelian dialectic for social change—Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis—is clearly evident in critical pedagogy's unlearningmodel for change: Learning + Unlearning = Relearning.

Unlearning, Constructivism, sight-word reading, and Outcome-Based Education are all deconstruction efforts to dumb down American students and promote political revolution. 

The Frankfurt School émigrés successfully politicized education and launched the Culture War in America. 

Their devotees and descendants effectively created a victim coalition of supposedly oppressed minorities—blacks, women, and homosexuals. 

And identity politics was born, another species of Cultural Marxism that fomented racial polarization, radical feminism, and the transgender movement in its efforts to collapse America from within.

American schools have become Marxist indoctrination centers where feelings, not facts, define reality. 

They no longer teach civics and American history; they teach revisionist critical race theory to, as Saul Alinsky said, "rub raw the resentments" and create social chaos. 

Revisionism is the reinterpretation of history and historical events, including reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved in those events. 

The fiction of critical race theory is taught as fact, to actively raise student consciousness of their respective roles as white oppressor and black oppressed

The political goal is to create racial divisiveness and break down our shared national identity as Americans.

Critical pedagogy supports radical feminism, which views women as an oppressed class and criticizes motherhood, marriage, the nuclear family, and heterosexual sex as evidence of a patriarchal culture. 

Radical feminism focuses on dismantling gender roles, advocating the total reordering of society as a response to life in a purportedly misogynistic civilization of domination and oppression of women by men.

Radical feminism does not advocate equality and partnership between men and women; it advocates conflict. 

Like supremacist critical race theory, radical feminism promotes female supremacy. 

The political goal of radical feminism is the collapse of the traditional American family. 

As Vladimir Lenin said, "Destroy the family, you destroy the country."

Without factual knowledge of history, students are easily groomed to become political activists in the Culture War on America. 

Dumbed-down, regressed students, many of whom are functionally illiterate, are extremely easy to exploit. 

But cultural Marxists have grown impatient; now they are targeting younger and younger children.

Critical pedagogy advocates the madness of LGBTQ biological revisionism, which denies the biological reality of maleness and femaleness, and teaches the fiction that gender is a social construct, a choice—a child's choice. 

The transgender movement is viral in America, and it is aiming its particular madness at America's children. 

Schools are no longer safe places. Lessons not only attack children's American identity, racial identity, family identity, and religious identity, they now also attack children's most primary identity—their sexual identity. 

The American education industry crossed the Rubicon in 2023.

How did George Lukács's cultural terrorism, which failed in Hungary, take root in the United States of America? 

The answer is simple: Barack Hussein Obama.

On May 14, 2008, Michelle Obama told the nation:

    Barack knows that we are going to have to make sacrifices; we are going to have to change our conversation; we're going to have to change our traditions, our history; we're going to have to move into a different place as a nation.

Remember that on October 30, 2008, candidate Obama told the nation, "We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America."

Why are Marxists confident that victory is so close at hand? 

Because the United States government is now in its third term of Marxist president Obama. 

In his book Anatomy of a Bolshevik [3] Alexander G. Markovsky, an American citizen born and educated in the former Soviet Union, holding degrees in economics and political science from the University of Marxism-Leninism, and an engineering degree from Moscow University, describes Obama's progressivism as Marxism in disguise:

    Obama's agenda is not about business, it's about social justice; it's not about wealth creation, it's about wealth redistribution; it's not about the law, it's about fairness; it's not about individualism, it's about collectivism; it's not about self-reliance, it's about dependency; and, finally, it's not about capitalism, it is about socialism. (p. 77)

    For the last 50 years, the progressives have been waging all-out war against American institutions such as education, religion, and family values. Their tireless efforts have paid off. Early on, they realized there is no better way to subvert America than to have a degraded education system.... The American educational system has been a disgrace for many years, producing an illiterate electorate that gravely endangers our democracy. (pp. 217–219)

Barack Obama's education legacy began by his fast-tracking Common Core State Standards, a derivative of the United Nations' Global Education First Initiative (GEFI). 

Common Core deconstructed American education with its emphasis on global citizenship, a concept antithetical to national sovereignty. 

Obama's secretary of education, Arne Duncan, praised universal education and the United Nations' World Core Curriculum (WCC), designed by Robert Mueller (1923–2010), a career civil servant with the United Nations.

Mueller was awarded the 1989 UNESCO Prize for Peace Education, and his World Core Curriculum helped establish the Global Education movement that currently affects all 192 UN member nations. 

The United Nations Education, Science, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) is the UN institution responsible for internationalizing education and grooming children to become 21st-century citizens in globalism's New World Order.

Preparing children for life in the 21st century, the desired outcome of Outcome-Based Education, is central to understanding globalism's planned Unistate. 

In the next chapters we will discuss how the various United Nations specialized organizations and agencies, including UNESCO, World Bank Group, International Monetary Fund, and World Health Organization, collaborate with the World Economic Forum, Deep State functionaries in the United States, and the virulent species of Marxist education in America to promote internationalism and globalist one-world governance.

https://goudsmit.pundicity.com/27751/chapter-16-ideological-invasion

________________________________________

ENDNOTES:

[1] Gramsci, Alinsky & the Lefthttps://themarketswork.com/2017/02/11/gramsci-alinsky-the-left/

[2] Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paulo Freire, Continuum Publishing Company; 20th Anniversary edition, 1997; https://ia801303.us.archive.org/8/items/PedagogyOfTheOppressed-English-PauloFriere/oppressed.pdf

[3] Anatomy of a Bolshevik, Alexander G. Markovsky, Published by Alexander Markovsky, 2012; https://www.amazon.com/Anatomy-Bolshevik-Lenin-Explain-Obamas/dp/0988396424/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Receive the latest by email: subscribe to Linda Goudsmit's free mailing list

____________________________

Pundicity page: goudsmit.pundicity.com and website: lindagoudsmit.com

____________________________

See Linda's previous articles for her book Space is No Longer the Final Frontier—Reality Is:

© Linda Goudsmit
https://www.renewamerica.com/columns/goudsmit/240429

Beware The Leaven Of Progressive Clergy


By Rev. Mark H. Creech
April 28, 2024

A recent article in the Christian Post highlighted a gathering of Christian clergy, theologians, and scholars at the Yale Divinity School’s Center for Public Theology & Policy. 

“‘Religious Leaders’ Sign Declaration Denouncing ‘Religious Nationalism,’ Promoting Progressive Causes,” read the headline, capturing the essence of the event. 

At the heart of their assembly was the signing of the “New Haven Declaration of Moral and Spiritual Issues in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a document condemning “religious nationalism” while affirming support for progressive initiatives. [1]

Bishop William J. Barber II, a well-known progressive activist, spearheaded this effort. 

Hailing from North Carolina, Bishop Barber previously led the Greenleaf Christian Church in Goldsboro and held the presidency of the state’s NAACP chapter. 

His advocacy during that time, notably through the ‘Moral Mondays’ movement, garnered national attention, albeit not without criticism.

Despite purportedly transcending political divisions, Barber’s tactics did more to exacerbate societal rifts rather than bridge them. 

While some lauded his causes, especially the press, his legislative impact remained less than minimal and overshadowed by disruptive protests that not only delayed legislators in the North Carolina General Assembly from doing the people’s business but led to hundreds of unnecessary arrests that congested the state’s court system.

As a registered lobbyist for the Christian Action League of North Carolina, I had a front-row seat to Barber’s conduct in the Tar Heel state. 

I contend it fell far short of the standards expected of a clergyman or a statesman. 

Instead, he operated as a political agitator with a religious veneer. 

His agenda was, and never has been, aligned with advancing the kingdom of God; instead, Barber has sought to supplant the soul-saving Gospel of Jesus Christ with spiritually ruinous progressive Christianity.

The current president and senior lecturer at Repairers of the Breach and co-chair for the Poor People’s Campaign, Barber denigrates Christians who espouse the belief nations that forsake God and his commandments will be turned into hell. 

He smears them with derogatory terms such as “white evangelicalism” and “religious nationalism” (sometimes referenced in America as Christian nationalism). 

He contends that their concerns are not only a perversion of Christianity but also a distraction from the real issues such as a living wage, healthcare, ecological justice, criminal justice reform, and voting rights – all focal points of the New Haven Declaration. [2]

What do these issues have in common? 

What thread ties them together? 

It’s not the Scriptures, regardless of the claims. 

Many progressives don’t take the Bible as fully reliable and reject its inspiration and inerrancy. 

These issues reflect a commitment to “social justice.”

While Barber and his co-signatories on the New Haven Declaration interpret ‘social justice’ differently from the biblical concept of justice, it’s important to recognize that both perspectives emphasize the importance of righteous living in community. 

In biblical terms, justice is foundational to God’s requirements. 

However, progressive Christians prioritize ‘social justice’ with a theological emphasis on addressing immediate societal needs to the detriment of considerations about the afterlife. 

Specifically, this shift alters Christianity’s message from a proclamation of Christ’s completed work of salvation and the promise of eternal life for believers to an emphasis purely on ethical imperatives for societal improvement.

Michael J. Kruger, a professor at Reformed Theological Seminary, in Charlotte, provides light here, arguing:

    “In other words, human problems are defined by progressives in purely horizontal terms (the way humans relate to the world or fellow humans), and not in vertical terms (the way man relates to God). As a result, the highest ideal of progressive Christianity can be nothing other than fixing present, temporal problems. Speaking of eternity is seen as a distraction at best and a waste of time at worst.

    “Tragically, the progressive position clouds the real message of Christianity – the real message of Jesus. Jesus cared about the suffering of humans, and he called Christians to do the same. We do not address human suffering as an act of moralism but as a response to the grace shown to us at the cross.

    “Moreover, we don’t address temporal human suffering exclusively. For even if we could somehow alleviate all human suffering, it would do exactly nothing to meet humanity’s greatest need. As Jesus reminds us, ‘What shall it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?’” (Matthew 16:26). [3]

In his epistle to young Timothy, the apostle Paul, gave in one short sentence the core message of genuine Christianity:

    “This is a trustworthy saying, and everyone should accept it: ‘Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners – and I am the worst of them all’” (I Timothy 1:15).

This profound truth articulated by the apostle strongly resonates with every person born of the Spirit of God: that we are profoundly sinful and none can attain eternal life through their own merits. 

Redemption required the innocent sacrificial blood of God’s Son, Jesus Christ, spilled on Calvary’s cross, to atone for our sins, reconcile us to God, and empower us to extend the same kindness and mercy to others that God has lavished upon us.

This is historic Christianity, which is a religion of grace, God’s unmerited favor, and not a religion of merit. 

As Kruger correctly contends “the ethos of progressive Christianity” is “actively turning away from matters eternal to a focus on matters earthly.” 

We shouldn’t “worry ourselves about what happens after death.…because no one really knows anyway. 

All that matters is helping the poor, feeding the hungry, and relieving human suffering.” [4]

Christian apologist, Alex McFarland, similarly addresses this serious doctrinal error, stressing humanity’s bearing of the divine image and underscoring the inherent value and dignity of every individual.

It’s incumbent upon Christians to extend assistance to those in need. 

Nonetheless, this doesn’t necessitate compromising foundational Christian doctrines about soteriology, the afterlife, heaven, and hell, says McFarland. 

The Gospel message shouldn’t be diluted, prioritizing physical needs over the desperate need for spiritual salvation, or endorsing political ideologies contrary to the Christian worldview. [5]

This is exactly what progressive Christianity does, demonstrating it is the actual perversion of the Christian faith, grossly feigning its authentic form. 

It is mostly definitely not the real McCoy, as Barber insists.

Eric Rush, in an editorial for World Net Daily, aptly labeled progressive Christianity as ‘apostasy,’ highlighting its perilous political ramifications.

    “‘Social justice Christians’ are those who profess Christianity, but who adhere to politically entrenched concepts of equality and redistribution of wealth. These ideas are ostensibly rooted in their faith, but in truth, they have been incrementally and insidiously insinuated into many American churches by Marxists, progressive politicians, and pastors whose religion has been tainted by the aforementioned parties.

    “How can this be? Well, through the misrepresentation of Gospel messages in the areas of charity and egalitarianism, such Christians have been led to believe that:

    • government has a right to enforce religious doctrines (such as those of charity and egalitarianism), and

    • Jesus Christ, as a threat to the existing paradigm, was the ‘first radical’ and essentially commanded this in his teachings.

    “A preposterous extrapolation, to be sure, but that’s what they espouse. And of course, government only has the right to enforce the religious doctrines of which these folks and their leaders happen to approve.

    “I declare that ‘social justice Christianity’ is apostasy; its adherents have abandoned their faith for a cause, and their religion has become perfunctory and pretextual. While some are misguided Christians, others…. are out-and-out Marxist posers.” [6]

If anyone doubts the gravity of the situation, consider Rev. Barber’s remarks at the August 2019 Democratic National Committee meeting, advocating for government involvement in healthcare:

    “If someone calls it socialism, then we must compel them to acknowledge that the Bible must then promote socialism, because Jesus offered free health care to everyone, and he never charged a leper a co-pay.” [7]

Allow me to be abundantly direct! Socialism, by every biblical standard, is anti-Christian!

While I typically refrain from critiquing fellow clergy, it’s worth recalling Jesus’ caution to his disciples in Matthew’s Gospel: 

‘Watch out! Beware the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees’ (Matthew 16:6). 

This warning, though symbolic, serves as a timeless reminder to remain vigilant against the teachings and influence of spiritually corrupt leaders, just as Jesus advised his followers in his own time. 

Its relevance endures today as much as it did when Jesus first uttered these words.

The true threats to America do not stem from those who are concerned about sin-related issues such as abortion, LGBTQ rights, and the rejection of traditional family structures. 

Nor do they arise from those who seek to safeguard God-given rights such as religious freedom and gun rights for self-defense, family protection, and defense against tyranny. 

The peril to democracy does not come from individuals troubled by the influence of secularism and liberal ideologies in education, particularly in public schools, or those advocating for the inclusion of religious perspectives in curricula. 

It is not those who prioritize border control who endanger our nation’s heritage, nor is it the professing Christians who support policies promoting free market principles, limited government intervention, lower taxes, and individual responsibility. 

Similarly, it is not proponents of tough-on-crime policies, including mandatory sentences and prioritizing law and order, who jeopardize our nation’s flourishing.

The individuals to be genuinely concerned about are those who profess Christianity, hold religious leadership roles, or serve as civic leaders but reject the foundational principles of historic Christianity. 

Make no mistake, those who peddle a false promise of cultural salvation can offer nothing more than a bleak existence devoid of vibrancy and hope. 

Those who espouse socialist political ideologies threaten to diminish our role as stewards of God’s blessings and ultimately relegate us to becoming mere slaves of the state.

This characterization aptly fits Bishop William J. Barber II and his associates who recently endorsed the New Haven Declaration of Moral and Spiritual Issues. 

It’s imperative to be vigilant of their influence. 

Beware their leaven, for it will drag this nation straight into hell.

Resources:

[1] Jon Brown, “Religious Leaders Sign Declaration Denouncing ‘Religious Nationalism,’ Promoting Progressive Causes,” Christian Post, (2024), accessed April 25, 2024, https://www.christianpost.com/news/religious-leaders-sign-declaration-against-religious-nationalism.htm

[2] Ibid.

[3] Michael J. Kruger, The 10 Commandments of Progressive Christianity (CruciformPress, 2019), 52-54.

[4] Ibid., pg. 51

[5] Alex McFarland, 10 Issues That Divide Christians (Regal, 2014), 69-70.

[6] Eric Rush, “The Apostasy of ‘Social Justice Christians,” World Net Daily, accessed April 25, 2024, https://www.wnd.com/2010/05/155917/

[7] Paul Kengor, “The Christian Left Just Doesn’t Get It: Socialism is Anti-Christian,” Crisis Magazine, accessed April 25, 2024, https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/the-christian-left-doesnt-get-it-socialism-is-anti-christian

Contemplative Interbeing

© Rev. Mark H. Creech
https://www.renewamerica.com/columns/creech/240428

WATCH: Beautiful Eva Vlaardingerbroek: 'Elites Have Declared A War On Us'

 AMERICAN CULTURE WARS FAITH POLITICS U.S. WORLD

WND VIDEO

'Now it is time for us to put on the full armor of God, fight back, and win'

Eva Vlaardingerbroek (Video screenshot)

Eva Vlaardingerbroek

By Jim Hoft
The Gateway Pundit

CPAC Hungary was held this weekend in Budapest, Hungary.

The conference was attended by conservatives from throughout the continent and America.

The unexpected highlight of the weekend conference may have been the riveting speech by the beautiful Dutch lawyer and commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek, who has been dubbed by the Dutch Press as "Shieldmaiden of the far right."

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

Eva did not hold back in her defense of Christian Europe and the current assault by the globalist left to destroy our civilization.

Do you agree with Eva Vlaardingerbroek on this issue?
  
Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Here is the transcript from Eva Vlaardingerbroek’s CPAC speech.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eva Vlaardingerbroek: Hello, Hungary. Hello, Budapest. Hello, fellow Europeans and American friends. Thank you so much for having me. Allow me to skip from Mathies for a moment and dive right into a subject that is not so cheerful, but very, very necessary to discuss. Let me walk you through the past seven days in Europe.

This week in Stockholm, three Three elderly women in their 70s were stabbed in broad daylight on the streets. In London, four people were stabbed in a time span of just 42 hours. In Paris, hundreds of Afghan migrants took to the street to riot. And – also in France, yet another church was burned down to the ground. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is just a few incidents in just a couple of days on our beautiful continent. But we all know that these incidents aren’t incidents anymore. If there’s one thing that’s for sure is that we know, and our governments also know, that there is a link between mass migration and crime.

In a Dutch city of Dordrecht, something interesting happened the other day. They announced, and this is a small city in the Netherlands, in my home country, that a new asylum center will be put in that little town. And what did the municipality do? They said, We are going to offer citizens who live in the vicinity of this center, a thousand euros to take extra safety measures. Our new reality in Europe consists of frequent rapes, stabbings, killings, murders, shootings, even beheadings. But let me be clear about one thing. This did not used to happen before. This is a newly imported problem.

Samuel P. Huntington predicted this over 25 years ago when he wrote, and I quote, In the new world of mass migration, the most pervasive, important, and dangerous conflict will not be between the social classes. They will not be between the rich and the poor. They will be between peoples belonging to different cultural entities. Tribal wars and ethnic conflicts will occur within civilizations. Well, boy, was he right? And the worst part is, we as a society seem to have become indifferent to it. When another white boy or a white girl dies at the hand of an immigrant, We might shake our head, we might let out a sigh, we might even get angry for a minute or two, and then we go on with our lives. We offer the family thoughts and prayers, but nothing ever changes.

Ladies and gentlemen, what does that say about us? This is the response of a society that has already given up, a society that has already accepted its defeat. But is this true? Have we given up? Do we really accept the new reality that our globalist leaders have in mind for us? I know one thing for sure, and that is that if nothing changes, if we don’t start to seriously fight for our continent, for our religion, for our people, our countries, then this time that we live in will go down in history as the in which Western nations no longer had to get invaded by hostile armies in order to be conquered. This time will then go down in history as the period in which the invader was actively invited in by a corrupt elite. And not only did this corrupt elite invite the enemy in, they made the native population pay for it, too.

Everyone who has eyes can see it. The native, white, Christian, European population is being replaced at an ever-accelerating rate. Let me back this up for you with some statistics from my home country. Let’s take Amsterdam, the capital. Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants. Of course, most of these immigrants come from non-Christian, non-western, African and Middle Eastern countries. Conclusion, the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities. But let’s look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion, native population outnumbered. Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants. Conclusion, native population, majorly outnumbered. Other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon if they haven’t already.

I’m going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The great replacement theory is no longer a theory, it’s reality. What’s interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say that it’s a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent. Dutch national disgrace, and dubbed Climate Pope, Frantz Timmermans, already stated in 2015 that diversity is humanity’s destiny, and that Europe will be diverse.

And of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the word diversity. It means less white people, less of you. Imagine this in an Asian or an African country. Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable, unimaginable. Reasonable. So what in the world is wrong with our leaders? The underlying sentiment of what they say is always the same. Our establishment claims that white people are evil and that Our history is somehow fundamentally different from that of others. Consciously or unconsciously, they have sucked up the lies and the anti-white dogmas of the neo-Marxist critical race theory.

That’s what the totalitarians in Brussels are trying to force you, the Hungarian people, a sovereign nation, to accept immigrants despite the fact that the population has said no, and so has the government. But make no mistake, the majority of the Dutch people haven’t asked for this either. Just like Brussels is forcing Hungary to accept these words of immigrants, they are doing the same now, even in the smallest of towns in the Netherlands. No part may remain remain Dutch in the traditional sense of the word. No part of Europe may remain European. It’s not difficult to understand why. If the old Europe still exists in certain places, then people will be able to compare the new Europe to the old, and news flash, they will prefer the old. That’s why the Eurocrats hate Hungary so much.

And their message is clear. Our way of life, our Christian religion, our nations, they have to go without exception. Their vision of the future is the neoliberal, unrecognizable Europe, where every city becomes like Brussels. Ugly, dirty, unsafe, zero social cohesion, where the buildings are constantly under construction and they never, ever seem to finish. Even when they do, the end result is ugly or somehow than what they started with. What are we left with? A permanent state of isolation, confusion, and disorientation. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the New World Order.

So what’s the antidote? A strong Christian Europe of sovereign Nation States. That’s why we need to outright reject the lie that nationalism causes war. It’s not nationalism or national sovereignty that causes war. It’s expansionism. Where in Europe do we find that nowadays? In one place and one place only, Brussels. Isn’t it funny how the same people who erode our national sovereignty and love to do it, give it all up to the Eurocrats there, that those people are now telling us that we need to spend billions and billions of euros on the national sovereignty of Ukraine? It’s a joke, honestly, and it’s a pretty sick, expensive, and dangerous joke.

During a recent interview, I got asked by an interviewer, Do you think that you ever go too far? Do you think that you’re ever too radical? I thought about it for a second and I said, No, I don’t think I go too far. Truth be told, ladies and gentlemen, I think we in Europe do not go far enough. I think that if we really think about the organized structural attack on our civilization, that we don’t do enough. Do we do enough to stop the attack on our families, on our continent, on our countries, on our religion. When we hear about another murder, another stabbing of a young innocent child, do we do enough? When we know that our national sovereignty has been given up in last than a century to Brussels, Do we do enough? When we hear that Christian kids in Germany are now converting to Islam to fit in, do we do enough? I don’t think so. The Totalitarian Institute of the European Union needs to come down. Let me be clear, I don’t believe in reforms. When the foundation of your institution is rotten, and that is the case in Brussels, you can rebuild the house on top of it all you want, but it’s still going to crumble.

So the only answer is the Tower of Babel needs to be destroyed. Ladies and gentlemen, we are the daughters and sons of the greatest nations on Earth. And we need to ask ourselves, what has happened to us? Where do we come from? And more importantly, where are we going? Our elites have declared a war on us, and now it is time for us to put on the full armor of God, fight back, and win. Thank you so much.

Elon Musk later weighed in on Eva’s remarks.

“The problem with “Great Replacement Theory” is that it fails to address the foundational issue of low birth rates.

Record low birth rates are leading to population collapse in Europe and even faster population collapse in most of Asia. Immigration is low in Asia, so there is no “replacement” going on, the countries are simply shrinking away.

If this doesn’t turn around, then any countries on Earth with low birth rates will become empty of people and fall into ruin, like the remains we see of the many long dead civilizations.”.

Eva’s speech already has 36.7 million views in less than 48 hours.

This speech is the reason why the Biden administration and Western elites are so desperate to control speech. 

They can’t allow the people to have access to free thoughts and differing ideas. 

Because the elites are leading Western civilization to ruin. 

It appears that was their plan all along.

This article originally appeared on The Gateway Pundit.com.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

Mounting Evidence Points To Nightmare Scenario For U.S. Economy

 MONEY POLITICS U.S.

WND MONEY

'Excessive government spending that caused this problem isn't letting up'

S""

(Image by Oleg Gamulinskiy from Pixabay)

By Will Kessler


Daily Caller News Foundation - The U.S. economy is showing signs of stagflation as growth slumps down and prices continue to surge for average Americans, experts told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

U.S. annual economic growth measured just 1.6% in the first quarter of 2024, following a report of persistently high inflation in March of 3.5% year-over-year. 

The combination of both low growth and high inflation, in conjunction with continuously high amounts of government spending and debt, has led to signs of stagflation in the U.S. economy, which wreaked havoc on U.S. consumers throughout the 1970’s, according to experts who spoke to the DCNF.

“It’s not so much that we risk stagflation as we’re already there,” E.J. Antoni, a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Grover M. Hermann Center for the Federal Budget, told the DCNF. 

“We have basically pulled forward trillions of dollars of economic growth by borrowing from the future, but that must be repaid at some point. 

And it is highly inefficient as well.”

Stagflation is a unique economic phenomenon that involves slow growth, high unemployment, and elevated inflation and is particularly difficult to address as solutions for one issue can exacerbate the others, according to Investopedia. 

The most notable example of stagflation occurred in the 1970’s, after an oil crisis.

Is Joe Biden to blame for this economic disaster?
  
Completing this poll entitles you to WND news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

The U.S. national debt climbed above $34 trillion for the first time at the start of 2024 and currently sits at nearly $34.6 trillion, according to the Treasury Department. 

The national debt has increased by around $6.8 trillion since President Joe Biden first took office in January 2021.

“Stagflation is the inevitable result of Bidenomics,” Michael Faulkender, chief economist at the America First Policy Institute, told the DCNF. 

“When you massively increase spending, whether green subsidies or student loan forgiveness, while simultaneously reducing the ability of the economy to produce because of all the regulatory restrictions being imposed, you get reductions in growth with higher prices. 

If Bidenomics continues, then we should expect stagflation to continue.”

Biden has made high-spending policies part of his broader agenda, signing the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan in March 2021 and the $1.2 trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in November 2021. 

The president also signed the Inflation Reduction Act in August 2022, which authorized $750 billion in new spending, with $370 billion of that dedicated to green initiatives to combat climate change.

The Biden administration’s latest plan to forgive student loans would cost an estimated $559 billion over the next ten years through various loan cancellations and interest suspensions. 

The president had one of his previous, more costly plans to forgive student loans struck down by the Supreme Court in June 2023.

Jai Kedia, a research fellow in the Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives at the Cato Institute, cautioned the DCNF about assuming the U.S. was suffering from stagflation, noting that the phenomenon is usually accompanied by major supply shocks..

“The news on both fronts — inflation and output — is far from ideal, but there is no reason to think that we will get stagflation from just this one report,” Kedia told the DCNF. 

“When stagflation last occurred in the 1970s and early 1980s, the U.S. economy had significantly different characteristics. 

That era was marked by severe wage inflation and strong wage contracting at unsustainably high levels, driven primarily by labor union bargaining. 

Businesses passed those labor costs on to consumers, and since those wage increases weren’t the result of any productivity gains, the result was inflation with little economic growth. 

That unique situation is (hopefully) unlikely to occur again.”

Despite recent low growth figures, gross domestic product surged in the third and fourth quarters of 2023 to 3.4% and 4.9%, respectively. 

Economic growth projections in those quarters included huge gains from government spending.

“Today’s report shows the American economy remains strong, with continued steady and stable growth,” the White House said in a statement following Thursday’s GDP report. 

“The economy has grown more since I took office than at this point in any presidential term in the last 25 years — including 3% growth over the last year — while unemployment has stayed below 4% for more than two years. 

But we have more work to do. 

Costs are too high for working families, and I am fighting to lower them.”

Top-line job growth has remained high as well, with the U.S. most recently adding a total of 303,000 nonfarm payroll positions in March with an unemployment rate of 3.9% after adding 275,000 in February. 

Despite persistent growth, gains have been dominated by part-time jobs and employment from the government.

“In general, high inflation and low output occur as a result of severe supply shocks,” Kedia told the DCNF. 

“The Fed does not have much control over such shocks, and it’s usually best to avoid making drastic monetary policy decisions on the basis of such shocks. 

It’s too early to tell if such a shock has occurred over the past month, so it is unclear whether output has gone down due to supply constraints, or whether the increased borrowing costs have finally cut down on people’s consumption, or whether this was a noisy data observation.”

In an effort to reduce the rate of inflation, the Federal Reserve has already raised its federal funds rate to a range of 5.25% and 5.50%, the highest in 23 years, with the last hike being in July 2023. 

At the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) most recent meeting in March, the majority of Fed governors kept their estimate from December that there would be three rate cuts by the end of 2024.

“There is absolutely no reason for the Fed to cut rates this year besides the obvious political motivation,” Antoni told the DCNF. 

“Recall that during the first three years of the Trump presidency, the Fed was raising rates and selling off the balance sheet, also called ‘quantitative tightening.’ 

The reasoning for tighter monetary policy was fast labor market growth and inflation fears. 

Today, those indicators look even worse according to the Fed’s own thinking: job growth has been much faster according to official government metrics, and inflation remains far in excess of the 2.0% target, with inflation expectations completely unanchored. 

They should be talking about raising rates, not cutting them.”

A majority of investors now predict that there won’t be a rate cut until the FOMC’s September meeting as inflation remains persistent, according to CME Group’s FedWatch Tool.

Business leaders are cautious about the current state of the economy, with JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon saying on Friday that he is hopeful that the U.S. can bring down inflation and maintain growth, but he is worried about the possibility of stagflation, according to The Associated Press.

“Sadly, the indicators point to stagflation for quite some time because the excessive government spending that caused this problem isn’t letting up,” Antoni told the DCNF.

The White House deferred the DCNF to previous statements.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!