BETWEEN THE LINES
OBAMA CARES ABOUT 'SOVEREIGNTY' – IN UKRAINE
Exclusive: Joseph Farah charges president with disregarding principle in U.S.
Was I hearing correctly the other day when Barack Obama explained his concerns about Russia’s incursion into Ukraine?
Did
I hear him explain it was a “violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty”?
Sovereignty?
I didn’t know this was a word in Obama’s vocabulary.
It
certainly isn’t when it involves U.S. sovereignty. So why is Obama
so concerned about Ukrainian sovereignty that he has brought us to
the brink of war?
What
is sovereignty? When applied to nation-states, sovereignty connotes
power or authority over one’s own affairs.
It’s
a great principle. I believe in sovereignty for legitimate
nation-states – including Ukraine. I think the people of Ukraine
should have self-determination over their own future.
But
more important to me is that the United States of America’s
sovereignty should be guarded at all costs. And what is so tragically
ironic about Obama’s plea for Ukrainian sovereignty is that he does
not feel the same way about the USA.
In
fact, he seems to be doing everything within his power to attack U.S.
sovereignty. Let me give you just a few examples:
- No one is a bigger champion of open immigration into the U.S. He has no respect for our borders, language, culture or the laws that protect them. He won’t enforce them. He won’t respond to the will of the people as it pertains to protecting them. That represents perhaps the most blatant frontal assault on U.S. sovereignty – when the chief law enforcement official in the land refuses to enforce immigration laws designed to guard our independence and the self-determination of our citizens.
- Obama is pushing two secretive international deals that impact major aspects of the economy, privacy and sovereignty. Last week he defended a proposed mega-free-trade zone between the world’s two largest economies, the United States and the European Union. It comes in the form of Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, or TTIP. One section of TTIP stipulates foreign corporations can sue the government utilizing a special international tribunal instead of the country’s own domestic system that uses U.S. law – meaning the tribunals are not accountable to any national public authority of elected body. The agreement would create new guidelines for everything from food safety to fracking, financial markets, medical prices, copyright rules and Internet freedom.
- Speaking of Internet freedom, Obama is also determined to cede authority over the Internet to an as-yet-undetermined international body at the end of 2015. Since its inception, the Internet has worked remarkably well under the jurisdiction of a U.S. nonprofit corporation. No foreign entities are even clamoring for a change. Obama wants to do it unilaterally, without even considering the dire consequences of placing arguably the most important institution in the world under the control of an unknown foreign entity completely unaccountable to the American people, not to mention out of reach of the traditional American commitment to liberty.
I
could go on and on.
Sovereignty
is an important concept for free people. The sovereign of the
universe is God. Under God, free nations are sovereign – meaning
they determine their own destiny. In free societies like the U.S., we
have sovereign states – or once did before they were increasingly,
aggressively and unconstitutionally eclipsed by Washington. In
theory, we also have sovereign individual citizens.
Obama
has never – not once in his experience in public life – stood up
for American sovereignty
– a principle near and dear to the hearts of those who founded the
country and enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and the
Constitution shrewd and thorough protections of it. Nor has be been a
champion of the sovereignty of states and citizens.
But
suddenly Obama plays the “sovereignty card” when it comes to
justifying U.S. meddling in another country halfway around the world.
Americans
should be more concerned about Obama’s attacks on U.S. sovereignty
than his pleas for defending Ukraine’s. If ever there were an
argument that runs hollow and disingenuous, this is it. Obama has no
credibility on the matter of national sovereignty – here or
elsewhere.
If
we’re going to take a national stand in favor of sovereignty,
especially at the risk of war, let it be here in the U.S. Anyone who
attacks the principle here has no legitimacy citing it elsewhere.
Read
more
at http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/obama-cares-about-sovereignty-in-ukraine/#yghHcCo1elfVAMg6.99
My
comments:
Virtually everything Obama speaks is a LIE. Sovereignty is the last
of his concerns here in America or anywhere else. He serves his
Sovereign, Satan. That is where his total allegiance lies. He is
doing everything in his power to bring America and the world under
the absolute control of Satan.
That
is the reason for his anti-Christ actions here in America. He and his
fellow, godless, Secular Humanist are faithful to one Sovereign,
Satan. Once you understand Obama's goal, and his allegiance, then his
actions make sense. His spending is just one example. He is out to
BREAK America Financially.
The
entire world is Bankrupt and when their house of cards finally falls,
they will clamor for a “savior,” and Satan will gladly supply his
son. Obama is looking forward to and hastening that day.
No comments:
Post a Comment