Heaven Is Our Destination Where We Will Be ONE With The Lord Forever

Today, we are in The Season Of The Last Generation. The Birth Pains that Christ Jesus spoke about are currently under way, including natural and unnatural disasters. They will be ever increasing. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold. Social, economic and political turmoil will be ever increasing, causing people's hearts to be weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the anxieties of life. An apostasy within the Church of God is currently under way. This will all reach a climax with Satan revealing his Antichrist and requiring that everyone worship him; That every one receive his "mark" in order to buy or sell; The new currency of the New World Order, the New Tower of Babel.

Today, it is critical that those who have a heart for God are aware of what God is doing and speaking today. God is opening up His Word like never before in preparation for The Time Of The END. I exhort you to open up your heart and your eyes to see what He is doing and your ears to hear what God is speaking at this time. My prayer is that we will be able to stand before the Son of Man at His appearing, without fault and with great joy. I encourage you to read David Wilkerson's book, America's Last Call at davidwilkersontoday.blogspot.com. Also, Google, Tommy Hicks Prophecy, 1961 for a view of the End Times.

Tom's books include: Called By Christ To Be ONE, The Time Of The END, The Season Of The Last Generation, Worship God In Spirit And In Truth, Daniel And The Time Of The END, and Overcoming The Evil One. They are available at amazon.com. They can also be read without cost by clicking on link: Toms Books.

Other publications by Tom at the same link include: You Are Unique In Christ, Demonic Activity Increasing, America: A Nation Of Cowards, LIFE: Knowing The Voice Of God, The Earth Full Of Violence: Christ's Sign, Reality: The Realm Of The Spirit, What Is Detestable To God, America At The Crossroads, Many Are Invited but Few Are Chosen, Christian Beware, The Antichrist of Scripture, The Marks Of A Christian, The Apostasy/Rebellion, Satan's Scheme, The Anointing, The Good News, The Water of LIFE, The World Against Christ, The Commands Of Christ, America's New Civil War, America Is Cursed Because Of Its Abortion Murder, America Unprotected, America's Irreconcilable Differences, Evil Begets Evil, America's War Against Christ, America Is Babylon and IN Christ: There Are No Limitations.

To receive Christ Jesus as a child by faith is the highest human achievement.

Today, the Bride Of Christ is rising up in every nation in the world! Giving Glory to Her Savior and King, Christ Jesus!
Today, the world is Raging against God, Rushing toward Oblivion! Save yourself from this Corrupt Generation!
Today, America is being ground to powder because of it's SIN against God!

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Wednesday, June 20, 2018


Brent Bozell: The Media Insulate Obama From Scandal

L. Brent Bozell III Tim Graham
 By L. Brent Bozell III and Tim Graham | June 20, 2018 | 4:34 AM EDT

President Barack Obama denied knowing that his Secretary of State was using a private email address to conduct official business in an Oct. 11, 2015 appearance on CBS's "60 Minutes." (Photo: Screen capture/CBS)
Former President Barack Obama is swaggering around and claiming he didn't really have any scandals as president. In February, he said we "didn't have a scandal that embarrassed us." This only means shamelessness can seem like a winning tactic. In May, he said, "I didn't have scandals, which seems like it shouldn't be something you brag about."

By any objective measure, this man is a liar.

Obama can claim he was only following the lead of his servile press corps. CNN, which screams about Donald Trump scandals all day long, ran a two-hour Obama special at the end of his second term during which host Fareed Zakaria claimed: "He ran an administration that was largely scandal-free. ... And he did it all the while under a microscope — because he looked different."

This man is a liar as well. There's no other way to put it.

So when the Justice Department inspector general released a report on the Hillary Clinton email scandal on June 14, it's not surprising that the network newscasts ignored any reference to Obama, who is certainly scolded in the report, including pages 66 to 69.

ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS did multiple segments on the IG report, and all of them completely skipped an Obama angle. They centered their coverage on how the IG scalded former FBI Director James Comey, and they ignored that Comey was appointed by ... who? Obama in 2013.

These networks also skipped over the report's discussion of the scandal of then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch meeting with former President Bill Clinton on a tarmac shortly before the Justice Department announced it would not prosecute. Naturally, in their liberal eyes, the scandal here was that President Trump was claiming he was vindicated by the IG report. This was apparently the false statement.

Obama can lie without any consequences. 
For starters, in 2015 he denied knowing that Hillary Clinton used a private email address for her government business. The IG report makes clear that Obama "was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her clintonemail.com account." 
As he so often did during eight years of assorted scandals, Obama claimed he only learned about it "through news reports." No one called him a) dishonest or b) clueless.
But it was worse than that. Obama caused indigestion inside the FBI when he went on television and insisted nothing Clinton did was worth prosecuting.

On "60 Minutes" on Oct. 11, 2015, Obama insisted, "I can tell you that this is not a situation in which America's national security was endangered." CBS' Steve Kroft nudged him, saying, "This administration has prosecuted people for having classified material on their private computers." Obama replied: "there's no doubt that there had been breaches, and these are all a matter of degree. We don't get an impression that here there was purposely efforts ... to hide something or to squirrel away information."

Lynch told the IG that Obama stepped in it by prematurely proclaiming on CBS that there was no national security damage. It created a suspicion of political bias at the top of the Justice Department. Obama repeated his line about Clinton's lack of harm to national security in a "Fox News Sunday" interview on April 10, 2016.

It's not like the networks couldn't find these video clips. 
As energetically as they create a persistent "crisis" for Donald Trump, they have put a protective bubble around their precious Obama. 
He can boast that he has no scandals because the "facts first" media have manufactured that false perception for 10 years.
L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org.




Exclusive: Jerry Newcombe on how 'the romanticist delusion' has harmed institution

June is the month of weddings. Now that the dust has completely settled from the mid-May wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, it’s interesting to note that the eyes of hundreds of millions around the world were looking at this whole event with great interest. 
Why is that – in light of the notion that marriage is just an antiquated institution these days?
The charismatic American Bishop Michael Curry of the National Cathedral made a worldwide impression in his impassioned speech at the royal wedding. John Sorensen, president of Evangelism Explosion International, said, 
“The bishop’s message, which focused on love, would have been a wonderful opportunity to share what biblical love really means. Sadly, we were presented with a Beatles version of ‘All You Need is Love,’ whereas, biblical love is Jesus Christ laying down His life for us.”
Sorensen added, 
“The bishop’s message on love clearly resonated with many people because we’re created for love, but true love comes from God.”
Marriage is ultimately a picture of Christ and His bride. Perhaps that is why the enemy of our souls hates it so much.
Meanwhile, why did the wedding itself garner so much attention? It’s almost the stuff of fairy tales. The answer is: 
“Marriage is the dream that will not die,” as my wife of 38 years often likes to say.
Sometimes, it seems like marriage is on virtual life support in the Western world. It is battered and bruised. It’s fine for the old folks, but not trending for millennials.
Writing for Bentley University, Meg Murphy observes, 
“Millennials are saying no to traditional marriage in record numbers.” She adds: “The marriage rate might drop to 70 percent – a figure well below rates for boomers (91 percent), late boomers (87 percent) and Gen Xers (82 percent).”
I think part of the dearth of marriage in our society is because of what could be called, “the romanticist delusion.”
The romanticist delusion has done a lot of damage to love in the Western world. Feelings come, and feelings go. But commitment remains the same.
In our book, “Lord of All,” D. James Kennedy and I address this romanticist delusion: “The idea that if we can just find that one soul mate, that single person, then we will have the pitter-patter of our heart, the flip-flapping of the wings of the bird of paradise, and we will sail off into the sunset. 
That is until one or the other does not treat his spouse like 1 Corinthians 13 says, and then all of a sudden the bird falls like a dead owl, and we wonder that happened. 
We have been led down the primrose path. 
No. Marriage is not based so much upon love (and this may startle some of you) as marriage is based on commitment – commitment to believe that marriage is a permanent, indissoluble relationship between two who have become one and who are no longer one any longer. 
Until we have that commitment, we do not have the fertile ground for the seeds of love to take hold.”
I know some young people who really want to get married. But they make the criteria so hard for a potential spouse. They raise the bar so high that virtually no one can reach it.
Specific things couples do can greatly increase the chances of their staying together. This includes praying together, going to church together and developing hobbies together. Being quick to forgive and to overlook faults contributes to a healthy marriage.
What’s happened to marriage? 
The New York Times once called America a “post-marital society.” Tragically, that seems to be accurate.
I say tragically because marriage is good. 
It’s good for your spiritual health, your mental health, your physical health, your fiscal health, your sexual life. 
In short, it’s good all around. And it’s good for society.
And yet marriage is under attack in America – seemingly from all quarters, such as:
  • No-fault divorce laws, which make it easy to get divorced, even if only one wants out. Imagine trying to do business with someone, where the other person can simply opt out whenever he/she feels like it;
  • Living together before marriage, which generally better prepares a couple for divorce than a happy marriage;
  • The feminist assault. One of their leaders said (long before she herself got married) that a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle;
  • The attempt to redefine marriage in same-sex terms;
  • The Marxist hostility toward it. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels declared in the “Communist Manifesto”: “Abolition of the family!”
Despite the attacks, marriage – which has a lot to offer, no matter how hard our culture tries to deny it – continues. And the world even stops to watch a fairy-tale version of the dream that will not die.


"Of course, everything [D'Souza] says here is accurate... But it's not going to sit well with people on the American left who, of course, are portraying themselves as the exact opposite of all of this." —RUSH LIMBAUGH

The explosive new book from Dinesh D'Souza, author of the #1 New York Times bestsellers Hillary's AmericaAmerica, and Obama's America

What is "the big lie" of the Democratic Party? That conservatives—and President Donald Trump in particular—are fascists. Nazis, even. In a typical comment, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow says the Trump era is reminiscent of "what it was like when Hitler first became chancellor."

But in fact, this audacious lie is a complete inversion of the truth. Yes, there is a fascist threat in America—but that threat is from the Left and the Democratic Party. The Democratic left has an ideology virtually identical with fascism and routinely borrows tactics of intimidation and political terror from the Nazi Brownshirts.

To cover up their insidious fascist agenda, Democrats loudly accuse President Trump and other Republicans of being Nazis—an obvious lie, considering the GOP has been fighting the Democrats over slavery, genocide, racism and fascism from the beginning.

Now, finally, Dinesh D'Souza explodes the Left's big lie. He expertly exonerates President Trump and his supporters, then uncovers the Democratic Left's long, cozy relationship with Nazism: how the racist and genocidal acts of early Democrats inspired Adolf Hitler's campaign of death; how fascist philosophers influenced the great 20th century lions of the American Left; and how today's anti-free speech, anti-capitalist, anti-religious liberty, pro-violence Democratic Party is a frightening simulacrum of the Nazi Party. 

Hitler coined the term "the big lie" to describe a lie that "the great masses of the people" will fall for precisely because of how bold and monstrous the lie is. In The Big Lie, D'Souza shows that the Democratic Left's orchestrated campaign to paint President Trump and conservatives as Nazis to cover up its own fascism is, in fact, the biggest lie of all.




Walter E. Williams: Dems want to keep blacks 'fearful, angry, victimized and resentful'

For several decades, a few black scholars have been suggesting that the vision held by many black Americans is entirely wrong. Dr. Shelby Steele, a scholar at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, said: 
“Instead of admitting that racism has declined, we (blacks) argue all the harder that it is still alive and more insidious than ever. We hold race up to shield us from what we do not want to see in ourselves.”
Dr. John McWhorter, professor of English and comparative literature at Columbia University, lamented that 
“victimology, separatism, and anti-intellectualism underlie the general black community’s response to all race-related issues,” adding that “these three thought patterns impede black advancement much more than racism; and dysfunctional inner cities, corporate glass ceilings, and black educational underachievement will persist until such thinking disappears.”
In the 1990s, Harvard professor Orlando Patterson wrote, 
“America, while still flawed in its race relations … is now the least racist white-majority society in the world; has a better record of legal protection of minorities than any other society, white or black; (and) offers more opportunities to a greater number of black persons than any other society, including all those of Africa.”
During an interview in December with The Daily Caller, Steele said the anti-Americanism that started during the 1960s and has become mainstream and visible in the black community is “heartbreaking and sad.” 
That anti-Americanism that so dominates the American black identity has been “ruinous to black America, where we are worse off than we were under segregation by almost every socio-economic measure.”
Some people might challenge Steele’s assertion that in many measures blacks are worse off than during segregation. How about some numbers? As late as 1950, female-headed households were only 18 percent of the black population. Today 70 percent of black children are raised in single-parent households. 
In the late 1800s, there were only slight differences between the black family structure and those of other ethnic groups. In New York City in 1925, for example, 85 percent of kin-related black households were two-parent households. 
According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year 11 percent of black children were born to unwed mothers. 
Today about 75 percent of black children are born to unwed mothers. From 1890 to 1940, a slightly higher percentage of black adults had married than white adults. 
Today about twice as many blacks have never married as whites. The bottom line is that the black family was stronger the first 100 years after slavery than during what will be the second 100 years.
What about the labor market? 
In every census from 1890 to 1954, blacks were either just as active as or more so than whites in the labor market. 
During that earlier period, black teen unemployment was roughly equal to or less than white teen unemployment. 
As early as 1900, the duration of black unemployment was 15 percent shorter than that of whites; today it’s about 30 percent longer. 
Would anyone suggest that there was less racial discrimination during earlier periods?
White liberals and the Democratic Party are the major beneficiaries of keeping black people fearful, angry, victimized and resentful. It’s crucial to both their political success and their efforts to change our nation. 
Racial harmony would be a disaster for leftists, be they politicians, academic liberals or news media people. As for black politicians and civil rights hustlers, Booker T. Washington long ago explained their agenda, writing: 
“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs – partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.”


 - The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 20, 2018
Perhaps the truest truism in politics is this: If you are explaining, you are losing.
Sober-minded patriots who believe America has borders and want to end the rapes, human trafficking and slavery caused by illegal immigration across the U.S.-Mexico line have been doing an awful lot of explaining this week.
That is understandable, given the unpleasant pictures, footage and audio scraped together from the border — all designed to tug at the heartstrings of generous Americans.
Since the aforementioned patriots who believe in our nation’s borders are the most generous people in America, they felt the need to explain.
And they have been losing ever since.
It should also be noted that the media coverage of the border orphans is the most dishonest, unhinged, detestable conspiracy they have ever undertaken.
Finally, these dishonest goons have found their Russian gulags to pin on President Trump.
Just when it looked like Mr. Trump had utterly defeated the blithering simps, they called a surprise audible.
(Quick! Run for the border! Take pictures of illegal adults dragging innocent children across the border and getting arrested! Blame it all on Trump!)
This did not happen by accident. I will tell you why they did it.
About three weeks ago, the mavens of fake news found a photograph of a couple of children sleeping inside a chainlink fence cage on a concrete floor.
Having failed to bring down Mr. Trump with Russiagate or Stormygate or by using the most powerful tools of the federal government, dishonest leftwing loons decided to hang those caged children on Mr. Trump.
They said it was a result of Mr. Trump’s heartless “new” policy of ripping children out of the arms of their parents at the border. (All of this is a lie. Any criminal arrested in any civilized country does not take his or her child to jail with them.)
For Mr. Trump’s haters, the picture was the best news of their hyper-political lives. Deliriously, they shared the picture far and wide.
Even Team Obama — feckless since they were run out of town on a rail after eight years of hopeless misery — swung into action.
“Look at these pictures,” rejoiced Mr. Obama’s failed fake news speechwriter Jon Favreau. “This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible.”
There was only one hugely embarrassing problem. It was all fake news, peddled by nefarious fraudsters like Mr. Favreau.
Turned out, the photo they were blaming on Mr. Trump actually was taken at the border during the previous administration, under the policies of one Barack Hussein Obama.
These sad, innocent little children in cages were, in fact, Obama Border Orphans.
Now, for anyone with a conscience, committing such dishonest treachery would be embarrassing. But, these people have no shame whatsoever. And their rapid reaction was simple: Double down on the lie.
And that is what they did. They all ran for the border.
In the weeks since, they have taken routine border enforcement along the southern border and twisted it into so many pretzels that the truth is no longer recognizable.
In one case, they ever staged a photo of a child in a wire dog crate and blamed it on President Trump. The faked photo, of course, went “viral.”
(So, for folks keeping score at home: That would be one crying child stuffed into a cage by the open borders wackos; none by generous American patriots.)
The bottom line is that any time any criminal is detained, OF COURSE their children are not sent to prison with them! Can you imagine the pictures if children actually got sent to adult prison? Imagine what would happen them in general population.
Of course, Mr. Favreau and the rest of these heathens do not care about that. They don’t care about rape, slavery and human trafficking spawned by their heartless, evil open borders policies.
Another thing, since when did Democrats start caring about children who are ripped from their parents when they are incarcerated for the crimes they commit? This happens to hundreds of thousands of families across America every year and not one little peep from Democrats.
The answer is that, of course, Democrats don’t care about children being ripped from their criminal parents if they are American citizens.
But a non-American from a third-world country illegally crossing the border — then suddenly Democrat politicians will gladly take up your cause.
• Contact Charles Hurt at churt@washingtontimes.com or on Twitter @charleshurt.




Exclusive: Linda Harvey looks askance at church conference for 'celibate' LGBTs

The Lord’s calendar is pretty full most of the time, but still He’s able to hear millions of prayers, lengthy petitions, meet those who are in despair and hear joyous songs of praise, every hour of every day.
So He’s probably puzzled why He has not received an invitation to the Revoice Conference on July 26 in St. Louis.
After all, it’s being held at PCA-affiliated Memorial Presbyterian Church. Doesn’t this denomination claim to love the Lord and follow Him faithfully?
Revoice is a conference for struggling thieves, those who know the eighth commandment and believe it, except they just can’t control their thought lives, including the temptation to steal lunch money, sneak perfume off the department store counter, shoplift a watch or two, even embezzle funds from work.
Can’t stop thinking about it, even though they don’t do it. Well, not very often, and not on purpose, anyway.
So they must be born this way. They want to be known as a “minority” so they can talk about their fantasies openly and ride on the coattails of anti-racism fervor. It boosts their self-esteem to meet together in a Christian church and discuss their unique needs. They can’t help who they are. They also can’t help finding the eighth commandment terribly annoying and inconvenient.
Oh, no, wait. Revoice is about “welcoming” homosexual sin and gender rebellion, not about theft.
Or is it?
God has offered his grace and salvation to anyone who understands what sin is, believes in Jesus, repents and allows the Holy Spirit to work His sanctification within the believer toward becoming a new creation in Christ.
But let’s be honest. Wouldn’t every human love to receive God’s grace without having to confess sin, or be open to change?
Revoice claims to be a “welcoming” conference for “celibate” people in the “LGBT community.” Yes, welcome – except for a couple of notable exceptions.
If you are a pro-family leader like Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth, you are not welcome. Nor is Stephen Black, executive director of First Stone Ministries, an ex-homosexual himself and a powerful witness to the truth of Scripture on this issue.
Both registered for Revoice, and both have been told they are not welcome.
Once again, amid the smiles and claims of “inclusion,” we have Exhibit A of the sordid reality of exactly what “LGBT” voices are doing within Christian churches and, indeed, in America. 
They want to Unvoice the truth and make up their own false gospel.
“LGBT” identifiers are banshees of neopagan idolatry, sowing division wherever they are given a platform.
Their siren songs of unbiblical noise drown out harmony, unity and goodness of authentic Christianity, where all truly are welcome to come as sinners and humbly receive the transformation embodied in the blood of Christ and His glorious resurrection.
Revoice invites the truth and repentance to head for the exits while homosexual sin gets a front row seat.
Not being acted upon, you understand. Just talked about, obsessed over, justified and claimed as identity. Riiiight.
Where in Scripture is sin to ever be one’s identity?
How stupid do they think we are? No other sin gets honor. Sin is filthy, it is shameful, and this sin is called an abomination.
We are talking about guys who desire anal and oral sex with other guys. Or women who desire to be penetrated with objects resembling a male organ, or to have ungodly intimacy with a woman.
True Christians with such desires would hide these feelings in shame – desires far from God’s glorious design of males and females, desires that deny any potential for the creation of new life.
The homosexual path is devoid of the life-giving potential of God-created heterosexual unions. It’s another reason for regret and shame, not “revoicing.”
Yet like every other terribly shameful human sin, this one is not beyond the power of Jesus to transform.
Revoice thinks it is. The leaders and supporters of this conference have decided God is just not up to this task.
No wonder the Lord’s invitation has gotten lost in the mail. If He sent in a Revoice registration, would He also get the same letter Peter and Stephen got?
“Based on publicly available information, we believe that your presence at the inaugural Revoice conference would work against the stated mission and purpose of Revoice. We are refunding your registration fee in full, and would be happy to answer any questions you have.”
Yes, we will all answer questions from Him one day, Revoice organizers included.




Star Parker compares activists to Nazi brownshirts on Kristalnacht

In 2014, high-tech executive and CEO of Mozilla Brendan Eich was forced to resign from the company he helped found and build, because he made a $1,000 contribution to support traditional marriage in the California marriage referendum.
According to accounts, Eich was subject to vicious attacks through social media for his contribution in the marriage campaign.
Mozilla’s chairwoman, Mitchell Baker, observed, “Mozilla believes in both equality and freedom of speech. Equality is necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for equality. Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard.”
That Mozilla’s chairwoman could offer such a confused, vacuous explanation for Eich’s dismissal sheds light on why the overall state of affairs in the country is such a mess.
Free speech is not about equality. Free speech is about the pursuit of truth. The equality necessary for free speech is equality under the law, where everyone receives equal protection. 
But when politics is the aim rather than truth, objective law protecting free expression gets flushed, and political operatives, like Baker, determine who lives and who dies.
Two years earlier, Crystal Dixon, a black Christian woman, was fired from her human resources position at the University of Toledo because she penned an op-ed for the local newspaper challenging the proposition that the gay rights movement is a new chapter of the black civil rights movement.
Carefully reasoned discourse – which is what Dixon offered in her fatal op-ed – is not welcome in a politicized society, because the pursuit of truth is no longer relevant. Only behavior consistent with predetermined political ends is.
This slippery slope leads in one direction. Less freedom and more oppression. Exactly what our nation is not supposed to be about.
It shouldn’t surprise us, then, that Gay Pride Month has become a time for LGBTQ storm troopers to pursue political enemies. Not much different from the infamous Kristallnacht in Nazi Germany, when Nazi brownshirts took to the streets to smash windows of shops owned by Jews.
Thus among the stories of this Gay Pride Month:
Another high-tech executive, the CEO of Twitter, with an estimated net worth of $5 billion, was forced to offer a social media apology for eating a chicken sandwich in Chick-fil-A
Patronizing a fast-food establishment whose CEO is a devout Christian, with the temerity to have criticized the Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage, is a high crime in the eyes of the LGBTQ judges and jury.
Russell Berger, chief knowledge officer of CrossFit, was fired for tweeting his support of a company decision to cancel participation of a CrossFit gym in Indianapolis in Gay Pride Month events. 
Berger, a seminary-trained pastor, was perhaps excessively inflammatory because he used the word “sin.” If there is any “sin” in today’s politicized America, it is to claim that sin, in the biblical sense, exists.
A Muslim Uber driver was fired for asking two lesbian passengers to leave his car after they began kissing and embracing.
Last year, my office in Washington had to temporarily close because of threats when, in a cable TV interview, I equated the LGBTQ rainbow flag to the confederate flag. 
From my point a view, it’s a totally reasonable assertion. As a black American, the Confederate flag communicates to me that I am not welcome.
As a Christian American, the rainbow flag communicates to me that I am not welcome.
According to a recent Gallup survey, 41 percent of Americans identify as evangelical Christians. 
Will the course of events in LGBTQ-controlled America preclude them from shopping, working, speaking, existing in our nation’s public spaces?
The preamble of our constitution says that “We the people” establish this constitution in order to “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”
The direction of events indicates that “our posterity” has much to be concerned about.
My comments: The Supremely Evil Court's Same-Sex Marriage Ruling, effectively made Secular Humanism the ESTABLISHED RELIGION in America, and subordinated all other Religions, including Christianity to it. In doing so they Spit in the Face of God and His Word, which is a Death Wish.