Heaven Is Our Destination Where We Will Be ONE With The Lord Forever

Today, we are in The Season Of The Last Generation. The Birth Pains that Christ Jesus spoke about are currently under way, including natural and unnatural disasters. They will be ever increasing. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold. Social, economic and political turmoil will be ever increasing, causing people's hearts to be weighed down with dissipation, drunkenness and the anxieties of life. An apostasy within the Church of God is currently under way. This will all reach a climax with Satan revealing his Antichrist and requiring that everyone worship him; That every one receive his "mark" in order to buy or sell; The new currency of the New World Order, the New Tower of Babel.

Today, it is critical that those who have a heart for God are aware of what God is doing and speaking today. God is opening up His Word like never before in preparation for The Time Of The END. I exhort you to open up your heart and your eyes to see what He is doing and your ears to hear what God is speaking at this time. My prayer is that we will be able to stand before the Son of Man at His appearing, without fault and with great joy. I encourage you to read David Wilkerson's book, America's Last Call at davidwilkersontoday.blogspot.com. Also, Google, Tommy Hicks Prophecy, 1961 for a view of the End Times.

Tom's books include: Called By Christ To Be ONE, The Time Of The END, The Season Of The Last Generation, Worship God In Spirit And In Truth, Daniel And The Time Of The END, and Overcoming The Evil One. They are available at amazon.com. They can also be read without cost by clicking on link: Toms Books.

To receive Christ Jesus as a child by faith is the highest human achievement.

Today, the Bride Of Christ is rising up in every nation in the world! Giving Glory to Her Savior and King, Christ Jesus!
Today, the world is Raging against God, Rushing toward Oblivion! Save yourself from this Corrupt Generation!
Today, America is being ground to powder because of it's SIN against God!

Product DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct DetailsProduct Details

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

DICTATOR OBAMA TO DEFY COURT, FORGE AHEAD ON AMNESTY

Obama_Mexico_flag


INVASION USA

OBAMA TO DEFY COURT, FORGE AHEAD ON AMNESTY

Leaked DHS memo shows 'tactical offensives' for 12 million illegals

President Obama is apparently going to tell the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and by extension the rule of law, to take a hike.
A leaked internal DHS memorandum shows the Obama administration intends to ignore a federal court injunction requiring the suspension of a portion of last November’s amnesty measures, the Hill reported Monday.
The document was produced for a “Regulations Retreat” agency conclave.
Obama has been criticized for acting in violation of Texas Judge Andrew Hanen’s freeze on certain aspects of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans, or DAPA, and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals initiatives, or DACA.
The administration has handed out hundreds of thousands of Employment Authorization Documents, or work permits, despite Hansen’s Nov. 26 ruling that doing so is unconstitutional. The leaked document came just days before the court was supposed to decide within whether or not to reverse its injunction, the website reported.
Demonstrators rally in front of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, July 24, 2013, calling for immigration reform. The demonstrators urged President Barack Obama to use executive authority to expand the policy that allowed hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who came to the United States as children to remain. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Demonstrators rally in front of the White House in Washington, Wednesday, July 24, 2013, calling for immigration reform
“We live in a nation governed by a system of checks and balances, and the president’s attempt to bypass the will of the American people was successfully checked again today,” said Texas Gov. Greg Abbott May 26 after the Fifth Circuit sided with a lower court on the injunction, the Washington Times reported.
The internal memo viewed by The Hill includes four options considered by the Obama administration regarding EADs for illegal immigrants. Option one would provide work permits to, “all individuals living in the United States,” (including illegal aliens, visa-overstayers, and H-1B guest-workers), while option 4 would provide permits to, “those on certain unexpired non-immigrant visas.”
Giving EADs to any of the covered individuals is in direct violation of Congress’ Immigration & Nationality Act, the website reported.
If Obama were to successfully circumvent the Fifth Circuit’s ruling, 4.3 million illegal immigrants affected since the injunction would benefit.
“Bottom line: The memo foreshadows more tactical offensives in a giant administrative amnesty for all 12 million illegal aliens who’ve broken our immigration laws (and many other laws) that will emerge before the next inaugural in January 2016,” the Hill reported.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/obama-to-defy-court-forge-ahead-on-amnesty/#jkuqViZj8D34ypdA.99

My comments: Who will STOP Obama's Lawlessness? That is the question as he has more than a year left to his term. He has demonstrated that he will use Any Means to accomplish his Lawlessness. Who will STOP him?

100 U.S. CITIES BEG OBAMA FOR MORE MUSLIM REFUGEES

Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake

Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake


WND EXCLUSIVE

100 U.S. CITIES BEG OBAMA FOR MORE MUSLIM REFUGEES

Mayors say Syrians will 'help build our economies'

Leo Hohmann
Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, mayor of Baltimore, almost gets teary eyed when she talks about the need to rebuild her city with immigrants and refugees.
It’s an issue that’s close to her heart, but the argument she uses is not new. It’s the same line that is touted by the mayors of other cities, mostly in the Rust Belt, like Baltimore, Minneapolis, Detroit and Pittsburgh.
They crave a steady flow of new immigrants and refugees, they say, because their economies depend on it. Too many of the native-born middle class whites have long since departed for the suburbs.
Baltimore, for instance, has lost a third of its population since 1950. Detroit has lost almost half of its population, and Pittsburgh has also struggled.
The Economist magazine gave a large chunk of space in its latest issue to Rawlings-Blake and her vision of a multicultural Baltimore.
“For more than a decade, Maryland’s largest city has been used as an entry point for refugees, with federal agencies led by the State Department sending 700-800 there each recent year from such troubled places as Nepal, Iraq and Eritrea,” the article states.
But Baltimore has had trouble even retaining the refugees sent its way from United Nations camps in the Third World.
About two-thirds of refugees sent to Baltimore moved on to other cities after a few years, according to the Economist.
100 cities vying for refugees
In fact, a coalition of 100 immigrant-supporting cities seem to be in competition with each other to see which city can offer the most services and benefits to attract foreign-born residents.
They help them find jobs, overcome language barriers and work around employers’ demands for birth certificates or drivers’ licenses. There are also grants to help them get set up in a business venture.
So it’s no surprise that Rawlings-Blake is one of the 100 U.S. mayors asking the Obama administration to send her city a fresh wave of Syrian refugees. She is one of 18 mayors who have written a letter to the administration expressing their desire for more refugees. The 18 mayors who signed the letter represent a total of 100 mayors with Cities United for Immigration Action.
Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner is among those inviting Syrian refugees to her city, but it appears her constituents are not so excited about the prospect, judging by a recent letter to the editor published in the local newspaper that received 114 reader comments, most of them against the mayor.
The letter at Syracuse.come was titled “Mayor, how will we fund refugee resettlement?”
Syracuse has received so many Muslim refugees over the past decade that it recently converted one of its largest Catholic churches into a mosque, a project that was approved by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and funded by U.S. tax dollars, Robert Spencer reported in his blog Jihad Watch.
Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto is also waiting in line for Syrian refugees, 97 percent of which are Muslim, and the vast majority of those being Sunni Muslim, the same sect adhered to by ISIS, al-Qaida, al-Nusra Front, the Free Syrian Army and other factions trying to bring down the regime of secular dictator Bassur al-Assad.
The security risks of importing Syrian refugees have been stated and restated by the FBI Director James Comey and his top counter-terrorism lieutenants.
But the mayors, in their letter to Obama, make a special point to play down the security issues focusing instead on what they see as economic benefits.
“The drive and enterprise of immigrants and refugees have helped build our economies, enliven our arts and culture, and enrich our neighborhoods,” states the mayors’ letter to Obama.
“We have taken in refugees, and will help make room for thousands more. This is because the United States has developed a robust screening and background check that assures us that we know who we are welcoming into this country. With national security systems in place, we stand ready to support the Administration in increasing the numbers of refugees we can accept.”
The “national security systems in place” for Syrian Muslims have been publicly exposed as a sham by Comey, who testified before Congress less than two weeks ago that the U.S. government has no capacity to screen Syrian refugees.
Pittsburgh’s Mayor Peduto is also one of the 18 U.S. mayors urging President Obama to accept more than his proposed number of 10,000 Syrians this fiscal year.
Detroit has also put its order in for at least 4,000 Syrians, with the plea to Obama coming from Michigan’s GOP Gov. Rick Snyder and Democrat Mayor Mike Duggan.
The 18 mayors said they would work to find space for refugees in their cities.
Peduto said he has asked four resettlement agencies — Northern Area Multi-Service Center in Sharpsburg, Jewish Family and Children’s Services in Squirrel Hill, Downtown-based Catholic Charities of Pittsburgh, and AJAPO Refugee Immigration Services in the Hill District — to determine whether Pittsburgh has space for 500 Syrians.
The smallest city on the list of 18 is tiny Clarkston, Georgia, a tiny town of 7,555 people east of Atlanta.
By 2010 the local high school had students from more than 50 countries; a local mosque had 800 worshipers; and by some estimates, half the population was from outside the U.S. Only 13.6 percent of its population is White, and only 13.1 percent is Hispanic and 58 percent black. The remainder are foreigners from the Middle East and Asia.
Economic benefits of refugees real or imagined?
Ann Corcoran, a blogger at Refugee Resettlement Watch who has followed the refugee movement since 2007, said the economic benefits of immigrants are often vastly overstated because they rarely take into consideration the cost of building new schools, hiring new teachers and special language coaches and translators.
“You know they’re not going to count the remittances that these immigrants send back home to their families, and I don’t think they include the school costs, so the only money I can see is the welfare money coming in from Washington, and of course that’s just going from one taxpayer pocket to the other,” Corcoran told WND.
Refugees immediately qualify for federal benefits such as food stamps and Medicaid, and 73 percent of refugees receive federal food stamps while nearly a quarter live in pubic housing, according to the Congressional Research Office study. Among refugees from the Middle East, the number on food stamps is even higher, at 91 percent.
2011 study by the Center for Immigration Studies shows that what the mayors’ hopes of reviving their cities through the importation of Syrian refugees is likely to be a pipe dream.
“A longstanding part of U.S. immigration policy has been to admit persons for humanitarian reasons. As these individuals are fleeing persecution, they are likely to be the immigrants least prepared for a new life in this country. Moreover, refugees have somewhat more generous welfare eligibility than other legal immigrants. Thus, those admitted on humanitarian grounds would be expected to have the highest welfare use rates,” wrote Steven Camarota, author of the CIS study.
Table 2 shows welfare use for households with children headed by an immigrant from a major refugee-sending country.
table 2 immigration costs chart

What’s more, Camarota said it’s not enough to argue that most immigrants work. Because they lack skills they most often work in low-wage jobs that require them to supplement their incomes with welfare assistance.
“While advocates of expansive immigration often make this argument, it does not reflect the way the welfare system actually works. Moreover, it is not enough to point out that most immigrants work. Work and welfare often go together as our welfare system, particularly non-cash programs, is specifically designed to help low-income workers with children. On the other hand, it is a mistake to see high use of non-cash welfare programs by immigrant households as some kind of moral defect. It is also a mistake to compare today’s immigrants with those that arrived 100 years ago during the prior great wave of immigration. Welfare simply did not exist in the same way in 1910. Thus prior immigration is not relevant to the issue of current welfare use.
“When thinking about this issue, it makes more sense to acknowledge that spending on welfare programs is a part of every advanced industrial democracy, including ours. Moreover, we have to recognize that less-educated workers will earn modest wages in the modern American economy. Therefore, our immigration policies simply need to reflect these realities.”
immigrant welfare table graphic

Corcoran said if the mayors of these 18 questions are asking Obama to bring more Syrian refugees to the U.S., they should step forward and take them, all of them.
Obama has committed to taking 10,000 Syrians over the next year, but the mayors say that’s not enough. Their letter says they “have joined forces to call on President Obama to welcome additional refugees beyond the number his administration has agreed to accept.”
The refugee resettlement agencies that work with the mayors have asked Obama to take 100,000 Syrians by the end of his term in office.
Which makes Peduto’s offer of accepting only 500 seem paltry and disingenuous, Corcoran said.
“It seems to me that if 18 mayors ask for 100,000 that means each of their 18 cities gets 5,555,” Corcoran writes.
She said all the activists resisting the refugees in places like Twin Falls, Idaho; Spartanburg, South Carolina; St. Cloud, Minnesota; and Fargo, North Dakota, “should be saying, ‘send our allotment to the 18, including to Baltimore.’”
 Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/u-s-mayors-beg-obama-for-muslim-refugees/#JAY0scJZkwxpb4ZP.99
My comments: Asking for more Muslim Refugees is like asking for fire to be place in your lap.--You will get burned. Islam is an Evil Religion based on the Koran that Incites Violence against Everyone, including its own. Muslims are trouble wherever they go. This has been true for centuries. 

THE DAY U.S. ALMOST WENT TO WAR WITH ISRAEL

BETWEEN THE LINES

THE DAY U.S. ALMOST WENT TO WAR WITH ISRAEL

Exclusive: Joseph Farah advises Jewish state not to rely on America

Editor’s note: Joseph Farah is leading the annual WND tour of Israel through Nov. 15.
JERUSALEM – How far will Barack Obama go to see that Iran is permitted to develop nuclear weapons as part of its announced plan to destroy Israel and the United States?
A recent Wall Street Journal report reveals it would even go so far as to attack Israeli jets targeting Iran’s nuclear sites.
The U.S. began spying on Israel since at least 2012 to prevent Israel from taking out Iran’s nuclear facilities – even sending an additional aircraft carrier to the region after learning that Israeli aircraft had penetrated Iran’s airspace in what Obama feared was a test run for an attack on Iran’s Fordow nuclear plant The attack aircraft on the carrier were reportedly prepared to respond to any Israeli attack – presumably by shooting down Israeli planes.
U.S. officials also told the Journal that Israel was responsible for the assassination of Iranian nuclear scientists. Those officials also told the paper that Israel wanted to strike Iran in 2012, and that the United States pressured Israeli officials into retreating.
The U.S. kept its nuclear negotiations with Iran secret from Israel, while spying on Israel’s military bases and eavesdropping on secret communications.
Think about that.
The U.S. was prepared to shoot down Israeli military aircraft that were sent to take out Iran’s nuclear arsenal.
Why was it so desperate to seek a nuclear deal with Iran that even administration officials admitted merely kicked the can of a nuclear-armed Iran down the road? Because it didn’t want Israel to be tempted to attack Iran.
That’s why I say Obama is the most anti-Israel president in U.S. history.
He would rather see a nuclear-armed Iran, preferably after his days in the White House are over, than to see Israel take them out as an act of self-defense.
It’s shocking, indeed.
That’s why you have to take claims by Obama that he considers Israel an ally with a grain of Dead Sea salt.
I’m currently in Israel, and I can tell you the anti-Obama sentiment here is palpable.
Israel is under siege, once again, from a form of asymmetrical warfare. Terrorism is a daily occurrence. Young Muslim men are attacking Israeli civilians constantly, usually with knives, knowing they will be killed. It’s senseless and suicidal, but it takes a toll in blood and stress on the state of Israel.
Yet, Obama and Secretary of State Kerry blame Israel for this carnage. Why? Because, they say, Israel is building homes for Jews in Israel. Unthinkable! And because Israelis want to be able to pray on what they consider the holiest ground in Jerusalem – the Temple Mount. That’s “provocation,” say Obama and Kerry. Of course, Israel should expect terrorism in the face of such instigation, they say.
Thank God Obama’s time in office is running out.
This administration has been a blight on America in many ways – but none greater than the way it has humiliated and demeaned the one and only Jewish state, the one and only free, self-governing society in the Middle East, one it only pretends to call “an ally.”
Every day I grow more convinced that the best thing for Israel is to realize America is not its God. God is its God. Israel has a special place among the nations of the world. It is the only nation in the world singled out for a unique and special covenant with the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Israel should remember that.
America has no such promise.
America’s only hope as a nation is to be judged righteous for how it treats “the brethren,” meaning the Jews of Israel.
Under Obama’s leadership, there wouldn’t be much hope at all.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/the-day-u-s-almost-went-to-war-with-israel/#b88ArBrMXSiupjz4.99

My comments: Obama is a Scourge upon the World; An Enemy of God and His Word; An Evil man, and Impostor, going from Bad to Worse, Deceiving and being Deceived. (2 Timothy 3:13) Further, he is not out of Office until he is out of Office. He has more than a year left to Wreak Havoc on America, Israel and the World. 

Monday, November 2, 2015

$20 TRILLION MAN: OBAMA NEARLY DOUBLES NATIONAL DEBT

President Obama took office when the total national debt stood at $10.6 trillion. That number will nearly double by the time he leaves. (Associated Press)
$20 TRILLION MAN: OBAMA NEARLY DOUBLES NATIONAL DEBT 
By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
When President Obama signs into law the new two-year budget deal Monday, his action will bring into sharper focus a part of his legacy that he doesn’t like to talk about: He is the $20 trillion man.
Mr. Obama’s spending agreement with Congress will suspend the nation’s debt limit and allow the Treasury to borrow another $1.5 trillion or so by the end of his presidency in 2017. Added to the current total national debt of more than $18.15 trillion, the red ink will likely be crowding the $20 trillion mark right around the time Mr. Obama leaves the White House.
When Mr. Obama took over in January 2009, the total national debt stood at $10.6 trillion. That means the debt will have very nearly doubled during his eight years in office, and there is much more debt ahead with the abandonment of “sequestration” spending caps enacted in 2011.
Congress and the president have just agreed to undo one of the only successful fiscal restraint mechanisms in a generation,” said Pete Sepp, president of the National Taxpayers Union. “The progress on reducing spending and the deficit has just become much more problematic.”
Some budget analysts scoff at the claim made by the administration and by House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, that the budget agreement’s $112 billion in spending increases is fully funded by cuts elsewhere. Mr. Boehner left Congress last week.
“The Boehner-Obama spending agreement would allow for unlimited borrowing by the Treasury until March 2017,” said Paul Winfree, director of economic policy studies at The Heritage Foundation. “This deal piles on billions of dollars to the national debt by increasing spending over the next three years and then not paying for it for a decade — with half of the offsets not occurring until 2025.”
The bipartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that only about half of the increased spending in the budget deal is paid for. Rather than a spending increase of $80 billion over two years, the nonprofit group said, the actual spending hike is $154 billion when interest costs and budget gimmicks are factored into the equation.
“Of this $154 billion, about $78 billion is paid for honestly” through Medicare reforms, reductions in farm subsidies, asset sales and other measures, the group said. “The remaining $56 billion of the legislation — mostly the war spending increase and interest costs — is not paid for at all.”
Of course, Congress bears equal responsibility for the high level of debt. A prime reason that Mr. Boehner left office was conservatives’ displeasure with his accommodation of the president’s budget requests, aside from three years of “sequestration” spending caps that helped limit annual deficits.

“We will be raising the debt ceiling in an unlimited fashion,” said Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican who tried to filibuster the budget deal before the Senate approved it in the wee hours of Friday. “We will be giving President Obama a free pass to borrow as much money as he can borrow in the last year of his office. No limit, no dollar limit. Here you go, President Obama. Spend what you want.”
Ever-expanding debt
The president said Friday that the agreement “is paid for in a responsible, balanced way.”
“This agreement will strengthen the middle class by investing in education, job training, and basic research,” Mr. Obama said. “It will keep us safe by investing in our national security. It protects our seniors by avoiding harmful cuts to Medicare and Social Security. It locks in two years of funding and should help break the cycle of shutdowns and manufactured crises that have harmed our economy.”
When Mr. Obama talks about fiscal matters, he usually takes credit for cutting the deficit by two-thirds. He also is correct that annual budget deficits have fallen from $1.4 trillion in fiscal 2009, in the depths of the recession, to $439 billion in fiscal 2015.
But the president rarely, if ever, mentions the accumulation of those annual deficits and what the rising national debt means for the country, for the presidents who will follow him and for the nation’s ability to pay for its priorities.
“Debt service will continue to consume a larger portion of the federal budget, and we’ll be looking at gross interest payments on the national debt of close to $1 trillion [annually] by the time another decade passes,”Mr. Sepp said.
Annual net interest payments on the national debt are projected to rise from around $220 billion currently to $755 billion in 10 years. Policymakers in Washington have been fortunate to date because interest rates have been at historic lows for several years.
“Debt payments comprise 6 percent of all spending now, but will more than double to 13 percent in 2025,” said Demian Brady, The National Taxpayers Union Foundation’s director of research. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office “cites two main causal factors: an expected eventual rise in interest rates, and the continuing expansion of the federal debt.”
Supporters of the budget agreement point to structural reforms in entitlement programs, including a deal that will prevent a 20 percent across-the-board cut in Social Security Disability Insurance benefits for 11 million people next year.
But Mr. Sepp said it’s not clear whether the provision represents meaningful reform or another budget gimmick.
“The infusion of cash from the retirement portion of the [Social Security] program will carry disability insurance for several years before any of the major reforms to the program fully kick in,” he said. “Lawmakers are claiming that they stopped kicking the can down the road on [Social Security Disability Insurance] when they’ve really just kicked the can into another lane of the road.”
Fiscal conservatives say it doesn’t seem to matter which party controls the White House or Congress when it comes to spending increases.
“When I ran for office in 2010, the debt was an enormous issue and the debt was $10 trillion,” Mr. Paul said Friday on the Senate floor. “Some of us in the tea party were concerned because it had doubled in the [previous] eight years. It doubled from five [trillion dollars] to 10 under a Republican administration. And many of us were adamant that Republicans needed to do a better job. We had added new entitlement programs, we had added new spending, and the deficit got worse under Republicans. Now we’re under a Democrat president, and it’s set to double again.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/paul-winfree/
My comments: America has an IMMORAL GOVERNMENT, one that has Spent the Future of the Next Generation.

OBAMACARE STICKER SHOCK: PREMIUMS TO SPIKE 20%

Obamacare premium are soaring much higher than feds predicted.


OBAMACARE STICKER SHOCK: PREMIUMS TO SPIKE 20%

Forecast counters feds' 'misleading' predictions

Cheryl Chumley

Obamacare premium costs are going to surge by 20.3 percent on average in 2016, a massive hike that counters the much more modest 7.5 percent increase predicted by feds.

The 20 percent increase was discovered during an analysis by the Daily Caller News Foundation. And it comes as open enrollment for Obamacare has just kicked off.
As the Daily Caller reported: “The discrepancy is because the government excluded price data for three of the four Obamacare health insurance plans when the officials issued their recent forecast claiming enrollees would face only a 7.5 percent average rate increase in 2016. When data for all four plans are included, premium costs will actually rise on average 20.3 percent next year.”
For comparison purposes, Obamacare costs in 2015 rose only two percent.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Center for Medicare Services, the entity that oversees Obamacare, miscalculated the degree of price hikes because officials failed to include data for the Bronze, Gold and Platinum plans. They only based estimates using data for the Silver plan, which is what the IRS uses as a “benchmark” program for tax purposes, the Daily Caller reported.
Conversely, the 20.3 percent number is the average for all the plans. But it’s only an average, which means some states’ enrollees, like Utah, could see hikes by 45 percent. Illinois residents may see increases by 42 percent; Tennessee residents, by 36 percent, the Daily Caller reported.
Pacific Research Institute senior fellow in business and economics Wayne Winegarden told the Daily Caller News Foundation the feds’ 7.5 percent price-hike forecast is a “misleading and a meaningless statistic” that isn’t “relevant to any individual in any state,” he said.
 Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/obamacare-sticker-shock-premiums-to-spike-20/#W0mGEYW61j4HuimI.99

6,600 FEDERAL INMATES RELEASED OVER WEEKEND




(CNN)The biggest federal inmate release on record will take place this weekend.
About 6,600 inmates will be released, with 16,500 expected to get out the first year. More than 40,000 federal felons could be released early over the next several years, the U.S. Sentencing Commission said.
The sentencing commission decided a year ago to lower maximum sentences for nonviolent drug offenders and to make the change retroactive, with the inmate releases effective November 1, 2015. Sentences were reduced an average of 18%, the commission said.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/6600-federal-inmates-released-over-weekend/#oS2ORu7siBdAUb39.99


My comments: This is the Obama Administration visiting Chaos and Criminality on the American Population. Such is his Hate for America.