Thursday, November 19, 2015

WHO IS AMERICA'S NO. 1 ENEMY?

131126obamasilhouetteflag


BETWEEN THE LINES

WHO IS AMERICA'S NO. 1 ENEMY?

Exclusive: Joseph Farah identifies biggest threat to future of U.S.

It’s a frightening and ominous prospect to think about who poses the No. 1 national security threat to the United States.
Is it ISIS?
Is it, as Barack Obama seriously suggests, “climate change”?
Is it Russia?
Is it the potential for an electro-magnetic pulse that could take down the nation’s electrical grid and fry the circuit boards we depend on for virtually everything in this high-tech, interdependent society, resulting in the deaths of potentially hundreds of millions of Americans?
Is it China?
Is it the unwillingness of the Washington political establishment to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws?
Is it the potential for attack by rogue nations or other terrorist organizations?
Is it massive civil disorder?
Is it the way Americans have lost control of their government?
The list of potentially devastating and catastrophic threats seems almost endless when you start enumerating them.
In considering all of them, however, I came to an alarming conclusion.
The No. 1 threat to America’s national security has a name. It’s a person. It’s the de facto president of the United States at least until Jan. 20, 2017 – more than a year from now. The No. 1 enemy of this great experiment in self-governance and limited government under the rule of law and through the will of the people is none other than the man in the White House – Barack Obama.
I don’t make this assertion lightly.
I make it on the weighing of the evidence before us.
Would ISIS have a chance to spread its virus of death and mayhem throughout the free world without Obama’s incubation?
Could he do more to encourage radical Islam’s goals of imposing fear and asserting control through his policies of forced importation of tens of thousands, perhaps even hundreds of thousands, of so-called “refugees” from the Middle East into the U.S. without screening against the kinds of people who attacked Paris last week?
When he accuses Republicans of spreading “fear and panic” by questioning the wisdom of this dictatorial plan imposed on an unwilling republic and sovereign states isn’t he actually and deliberately doing what he accuses his political opponents of doing?
Listen to his incoherent rantings for yourself to determine if I am not accurate in my assessment that Obama is the personification of America’s No. 1 threat to national security:
  • “We are not well served when, in response to a terrorist attack, we descend into fear and panic. We don’t make good decisions if it’s based on hysteria or an exaggeration of risks.”
  • “Apparently they [Republicans] are scared of widows and orphans coming into the United States of America. At first, they were too scared of the press being too tough on them in the debates. Now they are scared of 3-year-old orphans. That doesn’t seem so tough to me.”
  • “I cannot think of a more potent recruitment tool for ISIL than some of the rhetoric that’s been coming out of here during the course of this debate.”
He derided the idea that victims of violence in the Middle East – mainly Christians and other minorities – should be rescued from genocide rather than perpetrators and those with little to fear from Sunni Muslim ISIS, rejecting what he called a “religious test.”
Yet, what little we know about these refugees – what little information has been made available to the American people – is that they are overwhelmingly Sunni. If religion doesn’t matter, why is it that the preponderance of the so-called “refugees” are Sunnis? And why do we know that fact? Why are we even keeping track of their religion, if it’s not significant?
Obama adds: “When individuals say we should have a religious test and that only Christians, proven Christians, should be admitted, that’s offensive.” But again, if there is no test, why is it that the so-called “refugees” are almost all Sunni Muslims? Why are there so few Christians among them? And why do we know that?
Is it part of some bizarre affirmative-action program to “fundamentally transform America”?
Could I be right that America’s No. 1 national security threat is not named ISIS, not named Putin, not named al-Qaida or China or economic calamity but rather Barack Hussein Obama?
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/who-is-americas-no-1-enemy/#dZMFTlvOrgepA2X7.99

My comments: Joseph Farah is essentially correct, however, godless Obama was put into office by a godless, American Electorate, and they are America's No 1 Enemy! If that electorate, elects another godless person to fill the White house, America is FINISHED!  

No comments:

Post a Comment