Christ Jesus prayed that all those who would believe in Him would be ONE, just as He and the Father are ONE; that they be brought to complete unity so that the world would know that He was sent by the Father. (John 17:20-23)
Commenting on the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump, evangelical leader Franklin Graham said the "drive to impeach" Trump is "tearing our country apart," and that he has "never witnessed such intense hatred ... toward a sitting president."
Rev. Graham added that there are "spiritual forces of wickedness and darkness at work in our nation."
In his November commentary for Decision magazine, published by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, Rev. Graham applauded the Trump administration for its strong support for religious liberty in the United States and around the world.
Commenting on the impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump, evangelical leader Franklin Graham said the "drive to impeach" Trump is "tearing our country apart," and that he has "never witnessed such intense hatred ... toward a sitting president."
The federal debt has increased by $1,303,466.578.471.45 since last Thanksgiving, according to data released by the U.S. Treasury.
That is the largest Thanksgiving-to-Thanksgiving increase in the debt in nine years. The last time the debt increased more from Thanksgiving to Thanksgiving was in 2010, when it increased by $1,785,995,360,978.10.
It also equals approximately $10,137.48 per household in the United States.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, one-time Indian and beer drinker, would make a very dangerous president.
This isn't just because of her policies, which include ending the Electoral College, banning fracking everywhere, regulating a naturally occurring gas (CO2), being radically pro-abortion, decriminalizing illegal border crossing, and free health care for illegal aliens.
It's not only her complete phoniness, which is in one way actually reassuring:
It informs that the aforementioned policies are surely as pliable as her family history narrative.
No, it's also because she's frightfully out of touch with reality in a largely unrecognized way, one common to leftists.
Approximately 25 years ago, I attended a local feminist conference concerning how our "patriarchal" society supposedly hobbled girls' academic performance.
Because I'd articulately refuted the speakers' thesis using facts and reason during the commenting period, some of the organizers approached me afterwards, suspicious, wondering what organization I represented (only myself).
The group, perhaps four middle-aged women, remained civil, but the arrows shooting from their eyes betrayed their thinly veiled feelings.
Anyway, uninterested in my thoughts, they quickly begged out of the conversation by offering to mail me literature on their positions.
I said, jokingly, sure, "as long as you don't send a hit squad to my house." The response?
Very seriously and sternly they replied, "We don't do things like that."
They didn't get that it was a joke (and, mercifully, I didn't get the literature).
But perhaps those feminists graduated from the Patsy Schroeder School of Comedy.
To wit: Engaging in demagoguery during a 1990s budget battle, the Democrats claimed the elderly would have to eat dog food to afford medicine if the GOP prevailed.
Radio host Rush Limbaugh then spoofed this in a GOPAC speech, claiming he'd bought his mother a new can opener so "she can get the dog food easier when she has to eat it."
Taking this seriously, liberal congresswoman Patsy Schroeder (D-Colo.) appeared on the House floor the next day and emotionally exclaimed that "this is what it's come to! ...Rush Limbaugh actually said he's going to buy his mother a can opener so she can have dog food.
Wow!" The point?
These women exhibited a drastically poor grasp of man's nature, a profound illiteracy with respect to reading others.
They also are Elizabeth Warren; she is them. This is plain.
Consider Warren's livestream broadcast from her home, last New Year's Eve, in which she tried to sound down-home authentic and said, "Hold on a sec, I'm gonna get me a beer."
She consequently was widely mocked, with even left-wing columnist Joel Stein calling it the "worst impersonation of a non-elite since John Kerry entered an Ohio grocery store and asked, 'Can I get me a hunting license here?'"
Even better was the top-rated comment under the below YouTube video of Warren's beer gambit.
"Another Native American succumbs to alcoholism," "Shepface XL" plaintively remarked (you won the Internet that day, sir!).
Then there was Warren's response to an endorsement by an obscure, fringe activist group calling itself "Black Womxn For."
"Black trans and cis women, gender-nonconforming, and nonbinary people are the backbone of our democracy...," she tweeted November 7th.
Now, maybe ol' Liz was drunk on beer, or firewater, but as one Twitter respondent put it, "The 'backbone of our democracy'?
They aren't even the backbone of the alphabet soup community."
(In fairness, though, how many politicians have acquaintance with the concept of "backbone"?)
In fact, I went far down through the Twitter responses and didn't even see Warren's followers defending her puffery. It was that bad.
The issue is not, however, that Warren was marketing herself with the livestream and pandering with the LGBTQ praise; such is typical of politicians.
But it's normally done with some finesse and sophistication, giving wanna'-be believers some plausible deniability in their own minds.
Warren's inability to do this – her obviously total ignorance of how ridiculous she'd look and her inability to read how others would read her – speak volumes.
Call it extremely low emotional IQ, dislocation from reality in the given area, poor people skills, stupidity or something else, but it's a fatal defect in a leader.
Remember, for a president to effectively deal and negotiate with others, manage geopolitical crises and keep our nation safe, he must be able to interpret foreign leaders properly and send them the right messages.
Thus, a deep grasp of man's nature, which should involve a great ability to read others, is imperative – especially when your "finger is on the button."
Elizabeth Warren clearly, abjectly fails in this regard. In fact, being only human, even the relatively discerning can stumble here.
Just consider how in the early '80s President Ronald Reagan reportedly remarked, upon hearing that the Soviets genuinely feared a surprise attack by the U.S.,
"Can they really believe that we're about to launch a nuclear attack?"
However accurate this report, I'm certain the Soviets could have.
Note that people tend to project their own mindsets and priorities onto others;
thus would Reagan never think that another government could suspect utter madness from his, and thus would the utterly mad absolutely suspect it.
Note here that leftists are characteristically godless, and to paraphrase Belgian poet Émile Cammaerts,
"When people cease believing in God, it's not that they start to believe in nothing; it's that they'll believe in anything."
Leftists occupy an inverted moral world, a reality perhaps best illustrated by what an American defector learned about his "hosts" while spending decades in North Korea.
"In North Korea, when you lie they think you are telling the truth, and when you tell the truth they think you are lying," said ex-Army Sergeant Charles Jenkins.
"You learn real quick to say no when you mean yes, and yes when you mean no."
The North Koreans are obviously an extreme example.
But this all raises interesting questions:
How do people get this way?
Does the dislocation from reality lead to the embrace of the unreality of leftism?
Or does the unreality of leftism lead to wider dislocation from reality?
I'm quite sure it's both, actually.
But now I'll briefly outline Descent into Unreality 101.
Man has a great capacity to rationalize, which, of course, is when you lie to yourself, twist reality for yourself.
People do it when reality isn't what they want it to be.
This especially characterizes leftists, whose agenda is wholly contrary to reality, to Truth.
The problem is that when you lie to yourself over and over again, bending reality year after year, you fall further and further out of touch with reality.
Not only can rationalization then become entirely habitual, but you may reach a point where you can't "find" reality even when you want to
(Warren certainly didn't want to make a fool of herself).
Once severe enough, this may be called being crazy.
It's like continually feeding bad data into a computer.
How will the output be?
In fact, people can reach the point of having "corrupted files," more commonly known as character defects or dysfunction
(though I dislike psychobabble terms reflecting the atheistic lexicon).
By the way, this habitual rationalization likely begins in childhood, when parents (often "liberal") enable it by not holding their kids responsible and forcing them to face reality.
"As the twig is bent, so grows the tree" – and in this case it's not the tree of liberty.
And in reality, being human, we all have to guard against rationalization and ask ourselves, honestly, if we're ever and always seeking Truth above all things, even our passions.
What is for certain, however, is that the people we today call leftists surely don't – and they belong nowhere near the levers of power.
Michael Bloomberg became a multi-billionaire by understanding global markets. He analyzed the 2020 U.S. presidential political marketplace and concluded three things:
None of the hysterical, radically leftist Democrat candidates can beat President Trump in 2020.
Joe Biden's political corruption exposed in the Ukraine is irreversible and focuses unwelcome attention on the political corruption of the Clintons, the Pelosis, the Kerrys, and the Obamas.
The single most successful humanitarian hoax and galvanizing political issue of our time is climate change.
So what does astute multi-billionaire globalist Michael Bloomberg do?
He announces himself the climate candidate of the 2020 presidential election. In a November 26, 2019 article, Billionaire Buys Climate Change on Google, Brian Kahn reveals how Bloomberg plans to spend $1 billion of his personal fortune to buy Google ads that will reinforce his image as the climate candidate.
It is a brilliant political move by a brilliant market analyst because anyone opposing Bloomberg is seen as opposing climate change.
The advertorial message is that Bloomberg will deliver the world from the catastrophic threat of climate change, so a vote for Bloomberg is a vote to save the planet.
Bloomberg is betting that the galvanizing message of climate change is powerful enough to overcome any anti-Semitic objections to his candidacy.
Let's examine what it means in real terms, in real life, to the lives of real voters if this self-described climate candidate wins in 2020.
We begin by debunking the foundational premise of Bloomberg's political ads: Climate change is the greatest challenge and threat to life in the 21st century.
I have written three articles on the humanitarian hoax of climate change:
The Humanitarian Hoax of climate change is the whopper of the 21st century. It is a deliberate political scheme to transfer the wealth of industrialized nations (particularly the U.S.) to non-industrialized nations. It is globalized socialism where the assets of productive nations are transferred to non-productive nations. WHY?
The answer is found in understanding the nature of the hoax which has two parts. First, it is necessary to focus attention on the fabricated specter of catastrophic climate occurrences that will devastate the planet to deflect attention away from the actual threats to America from a nuclear Iran, the spread of Islamic terrorism, and the economic instability of a an unsustainable trade deficit.
Second, Obama's long term plan of an internationalized globalized world requires the de-industrialization of America. His crippling energy restrictions were designed to weaken America's defenses by destroying America's energy industry, making us more dependent on foreign energy, and increasing our trade deficit to unsustainable levels. Obama actively supported the punitive anti-American Paris Climate Agreement deceitfully presented as the premier humanitarian effort to save the planet from catastrophic climate change. Obama disguised his crippling rules and regulations to destroy U.S. energy as altruism and a humanitarian concern for the planet.
In a laughable outburst Big Footprint former Vice President Al Gore attacked President Donald Trump accusing him of "tearing down America's standing in the world" by withdrawing from the Paris climate accord. Only in the eyes of a deceitful globalist can withdrawing from an anti-American agreement be considered destructive. Gore actually said with a straight face on NBC's Today Show, "The climate crisis is by far the most serious challenge we face." Al Gore's "Inconvenient Truth" is in fact a very "Convenient Lie."
More doomsday fear mongering is featured in a Breitbart article discussing David Wallace-Wells' new book The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming that predicts there will be 100 million climate refugees by 2050. SERIOUSLY? Wallace-Wells defends his cataclysmic predictions saying that he worked from the worst warming scenario presented by the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
A stunning Forbes article published 2.5.13 titled, In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their "Science" quotes Kevin Trenberth, a lead author of 2001 and 2007 IPCC report chapters, who admits, 'None of the models used by the IPCC are initialized to the observed state and none of the climate states in the models correspond even remotely to the current observed state.'
The same Forbes article quotes former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev who "emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance Marxist objectives saying, 'The threat of environmental crisis will be the international key to unlock the New World Order.'" Gorbachev was referring, of course, to the globalist New World Order of an internationalized world community administered under the auspices of the United Nations.
The climate changes, but "manmade" climate change is the deliberately misleading narrative that human behavior is causing cataclysmic changes to the Earth's climate. The Climategate scandal exposed the fraudulent "research" that supported its politically motivated claims and exposed the hoax.
The United Nations IPCC goals are unapologetically stated in United Nations Agenda 2030 – the manifesto for imposing the new world order of one world government. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals reaffirm the United Nations globalist stance that planet Earth and its ecosystems are "our common home and that 'Mother Earth' is a common expression in a number of countries and regions." This is all Orwellian doublespeak to rationalize imposition of a New World Order of one world government under the auspices of the corrupt United Nations.
This article includes testimony by Greenpeace apostate Patrick Moore exposing the lie of "settled science." He explains how environmental science has been completely co-opted by political science. There is not a shred of credible evidence that manmade climate change exists – but no matter. The truth never stops a determined huckster. Moore explains:
"When they talk about the 99 percent consensus [among scientists] on climate change, that's a completely ridiculous and false number. But most of the scientists – put it in quotes, scientists – who are pushing this catastrophic theory are getting paid by public money, they are not being paid by General Electric or Dupont or 3M to do this research, where private companies expect to get something useful from their research that might produce a better product and make them a profit in the end because people want it – build a better mousetrap type of idea.
And so you've got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You've got the media echo chamber – fake news – repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they're killing their children."
Shaming is a powerful tool used and abused by humanitarian hucksters to promote their manmade climate change narrative, and to silence any opposition to their false claims of "settled" climate science.
The manmade climate change hucksters continue to perpetrate their monstrous hoax through fear and guilt. Fear is a powerful motivator for behavior change. If parents can be convinced that catastrophe will strike their children unless they change their own behavior, their guilt will motivate parents to change and the big lie of manmade climate change becomes generational.
American democracy is the single greatest existential threat to one-world government with President Donald Trump as America's leader.
The globalist elite are desperate to stop Trump because if Obama is exposed as a con man it leaves them without their primetime huckster to continue marching America toward anarchy and socialism with his "resistance" movement.
The globalist elites who fund the leftist humanitarian hucksters are using them as useful idiots to facilitate climate alarmism and the great humanitarian hoax of climate change worldwide.
It is a deliberate plan to create the overwhelming social chaos necessary to impose their own special brand of a New World Order.
Michael Bloomberg is a member of the globalist Trilateral Commission, the think tank founded by globalist David Rockefeller in 1973 to foster "cooperation" among nations.
To fully understand the objective of a globalist one must understand the duplicitous language of a globalist.
To a globalist, cooperation means cooperating in the implementation of an internationalized New World Order.
Michael Bloomberg is also a member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, another globalist think tank dedicated to the New World Order.
David Rockefeller, former chairman of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations from 1970-1985 stated unapologetically in his Memoirs:
Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it – p.405
We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries – David Rockefeller to Trilateral Commission in 1991
Lord Bertrand Russell wrote a book titled The Impact of Science on Society in 1952 which unapologetically describes in chilling detail the intention of the few globalist elites in England and America, including the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, to impose one-world government as the answer to the Malthusian problem of the earth's resources being unable to sustain population growth.
There is no national sovereignty, no middle class, no upward mobility, and no individual freedoms.
The globalist elites envision a feudal binary socio-political system of masters and slaves where they are the ruling elite served by an enslaved population – everyone else is eliminated.
"World population needs to be decreased by 50%" – Henry Kissinger.
Michael Bloomberg is a clear and present danger to American sovereignty.
His philosophical positions reflect the same condescending aristocratic attitudes of Lord Bertrand Russell, David Rockefeller, and Henry Kissinger.
Michael Bloomberg is the climate candidate huckster who champions bringing one-world government to America disguised as altruism.
Michael Bloomberg is the candidate of one-world government and the political aristocracy who believe they are superior and entitled to be the masters of the world's population of slaves.
Michael Bloomberg, the 2020 climate candidate, is the personification of the humanitarian hoax of climate change and the man attempting to impose globalism's New World Order.
He is the consummate humanitarian huckster presenting himself as America's advocate when in fact he is America's existential enemy.
If Michael Bloomberg becomes the 2020 Democrat candidate, the election will be a clash of the titans that will determine the future course and structure of life on Earth.
President Donald Trump representing the American flag of freedom and national sovereignty VS. Michael Bloomberg representing the globalist flag of one-world government and a return to the feudal totalitarian New World Order ruled by the globalist political elite.
One sure sign of the escalating inflammation of conflict in America is the controversial formation of sanctuary counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
The label is unfortunate because it is confusing to some.
Unlike the cities and states that harbor illegal aliens from I.C.E. agents, many Virginia counties are declaring themselves to be citadels of Constitutional liberty.
At least twelve Virginia counties have now resolved to become Second Amendment sanctuary counties in anticipation of numerous hostile Democrat threats to gun rights in the upcoming 2020 General Assembly session.
More counties are joining them.
Just last week, two more County Boards of Supervisors passed resolutions affirming their dedication to the Virginia and United States constitutions.
Consider the staggering significance of this action for a moment. Local officials are vowing to support the fundamental law of the land in preparation for sweeping betrayals by radical state legislators and Governor Ralph Northam.
As a rule, many Americans are inclined to oppose sanctuary policies for the simple reason that they are usually enacted by rebellious people who are determined to shield themselves from the legitimate laws of government.
But the actions proposed by Governor Northam and Democrats in Richmond are not legitimate.
These are dangerous times in which renegade politicians are running roughshod over the U.S. Constitution and the will of the people
– not only regarding the Second Amendment, but also the First Amendment and the very right to life. New intrusive gun regulations proposed by Virginia Governor, Ralph Northam, former New York City Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, Democrats in Congress and the Virginia General Assembly, are routinely couched as efforts to curb gun violence.
But they are disingenuous.
When these folks speak of ACommon-sense gun regulations@ and AUniversal Background Checks@ they actually mean gun registration – the first crucial step toward confiscation and prosecution of the just.
The fact is that we all want to stop gun violence, but no effort by politicians in Richmond or Washington will prevent gangsters or convicted felons from getting guns by theft or other illegal means.
As John Adams pointed out at our nation's birth, no law or court of men can affect the depraved condition of a human heart. [1] That's where the real problem lies.
There are some who foolishly believe that any firearm that is not designed specifically for hunting should be banned.
Others have been taught to despise a particular type of firearm such as a provocatively misnamed Aassault rifle.@
Still others have been blindly led to believe that limitations on the number of rounds any weapon can contain are acceptable, even harmless restrictions.
But they are wrong.
These poor folks fail to recognize that the purpose of the Second Amendment is to provide to citizens, the ability to defend themselves – even from a tyrannical government, if necessary
– not from an invasion of wildlife or garden pests.
Short-sighted people are often willing to forfeit liberties that they consider to be incidental.
But we must declare that there are no incidental rights.
An affront to the Constitutional rights of the people in any form must be seen for what it truly is
– an attack on all the rights of the people by reprobate lawmakers.
Today, it=s the Second Amendment; tomorrow it may be the First, Fourth or Fifth.
Governor Northam and his colleagues support killing the just-born-infant today.
Tomorrow they may come for children or adults at any age, for any reason or no reason.
This new brand of evil will never be satiated.
We deceive ourselves by thinking otherwise.
As America rejects its foundational faith in God, it becomes more horrifying and dangerous.
Evil thrives equally well in low light and in total darkness.
Free access to a variety of firearms by legal citizens is a precious freedom that saves thousands of innocent lives each year.
The fact that it may cost some does not alter that fact.
The Supreme Court's regrettably short-sighted decision to permit victims of violence to sue gun makers for the deadly and illegal abuse of their products has only compounded the problem.
As with the Dred Scott decision and the Missouri Compromise of 1850, the ruling will one day be seen as the spark thrown toward a tinder-box that creates terrible unintended consequences.
Virginia was the site of the first American Civil War.
No knowledgeable citizen wants to see it become the site of a second.
But the nation is throttling swiftly in that direction.
If making counties sanctuaries of liberty in lawless states will preserve individual liberty and dissuade treacherous politicians from sparking an armed conflict, then we should support the adoption of similar policies and urge all our neighbors to do likewise.
Perhaps we may then avoid the wholesale tyranny that our ancestors cast off two hundred and forty-three years ago.
But that's not likely to be the case.
________________________________
[1] "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other," President John Adams.
It would seem that the entire democratic party has long forgotten the adage spoken by former President Rutherford B. Hayes who declared – "He serves his party best who serves the country best."
With only a few exceptions the entire democratic party has become obsessed with only one matter – the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump.
No one in America would dare to say that the democrats have done anything to serve the country in the last two years.
The party of dead unborn babies and the defense of homosexual and transgender perversions, now has, Congressman Adam Schiff, coming on like a bug-eyed neurotic with a severe case of OCD, scratching and tearing at a sitting president.
With Hollywood celebrities offering money and support for impeachment and progressives frothing at the mouth over Trump's crushing defeat of Hillary Clinton in 2016, the climate of revenge has become a dark cloud hanging over a once noble political party.
The fervor of the democrats has caused Evangelist Franklin Graham, the son of the late Billy Graham, to say that the forces lined up against President Trump are in fact "demonically driven."
Demonic or not, the unbridled and vicious attacks on President Trump are off the charts for any cause imagined or real.
Schiff's fervor to overthrow, bring down, de-stabilize and destroy Mr. Trump is the perfect definition of an attempt to subvert the President and his entire administration.
In President Trump's colorful vernacular, he says it is a witch hunt, but in reality, it is an attempt to subvert that will never meet with the approval of the Devine. To wit:
"To subvert a man in his cause, the Lord approveth not." (Lamentations 3:36)
OCD and perverted tendencies are not exclusive to individuals in this day of creeping political correctness and group thinking.
Now commercial enterprise and businesses are using their clout to beat down the standards of conservatism and natural law.
Example, Chick-fil-A has announced its plan to suspend support for the Salvation Army.
SA's pro-life stand and its staunch resistance to homosexuality and transgenderism is well known, but what is not well known is that many years ago the SA took a similar stand even though it was very costly for them.
When the United Way decided to pay for abortions, the Salvation Army refused any further help from the UW even though it was one of their greatest support resources at the time.
Why does a highly successful corporation come after a long-respected charity with a history of humanitarian aid almost unparalleled in our nation?
This is where the word demonic seems to fit perfectly.
Perhaps, this is the day to stop lining up for some of that tasty chicken and get in the line leading to the Salvation Army's Christmas buckets and give up some of that chicken money to a just cause.
Finally, it must be noted that we may have just experienced what could be the most perverted judicial ruling in the history of our nation.
It was a direct attack on the First Amendment and a world class act of perverted justice that begs to be drawn before the highest court in the land.
Mr. David Daleiden and his team of fellow reporters was pronounced guilty by a jury in San Francisco's U.S. District Court of fraud, trespassing and other charges for uncovering Planned Parenthood's part in the sale of body parts taken from aborted babies.
Harvesting of human body parts is now considered less of a crime, than uncovering that crime – this should be considered the new universal definition of perversion.
We may safely say that these compulsive and perverted behaviors are generally due to the penchant for all things liberal and progressive.
We may say like Franklin Graham that it is demonic, but trying to identify the source of this trend is not altogether necessary. Being pridefully cocksure of ourselves is a ticket to a fall.
Not recognizing pure evil is a promise of destruction.
"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." (Proverbs 16: 25) Related
Michael Bresciani is the editor of American Prophet.org since 2005. The website features the articles and reports of Bresciani along with some of America's best writers and journalists. Millions have read his timely reports and articles in online journals and print publications across the nation and the globe. Visit us at, GAB, SocialCross, also on Twitter and Facebook
(DAILY WIRE) Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro visited the campus of Stanford University on Nov. 7 to deliver a speech in which he exposed the “dangerous game” being played by the racist Alt-Right movement and their counterparts on the radical left. Despite taking aim for most of the speech at the far-right, Shapiro was protested by left-wing student activists before and during the speech. His appearance on the campus was also referenced disparagingly a few days later in a letter from Stanford’s provost announcing new actions taken by the university to clamp down on “misgendering” people.
(DAILY WIRE) Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro visited the campus of Stanford University on Nov. 7 to deliver a speech in which he exposed the “dangerous game” being played by the racist Alt-Right movement and their counterparts on the radical left. Despite taking aim for most of the speech...
