Saturday, September 30, 2017

FRIENDSHIP WITH THE WORLD IS HATRED TOWARD GOD

What causes Fights and Quarrels among you?
Don't they come from your desires
That Battle within you?

2 You want something but don't get it.
You Kill and Covet, but you cannot have what you want.
You Quarrel and Fight.

YOU DO NOT HAVE BECAUSE YOU DO NOT ASK GOD.

3 WHEN YOU ASK,
YOU DO NOT RECEIVE,
BECAUSE YOU ASK WITH WRONG MOTIVES,
THAT YOU MAY SPEND WHAT YOU GET ON YOUR PLEASURES.

4 YOU ADULTEROUS PEOPLE,
DON'T YOU KNOW THAT FRIENDSHIP WITH THE WORLD
IS HATRED TOWARD GOD?

ANYONE WHO CHOOSES TO BE A FRIEND OF THE WORLD
BECOMES THE ENEMY OF GOD.

(James 4:1-4)

'YOU DON'T LIKE OUR COUNTRY, GET THE HEL LOUT!'

Ditka: 'You Don't Like the Country, Get the Hell Out!' -- 'I Have No Respect' for Kaepernick



Michael W. Chapman
 By Michael W. Chapman | September 28, 2017 | 12:30 PM EDT

Mike Ditka. (Screenshot)
Three-time Super Bowl champion and Pro Football Hall of Fame member Mike Ditka, who also is an analyst for ESPN's NFL Live, said he did not agree with 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick -- now a free agent -- kneeling in protest during the national anthem, saying he had "no respect for Kaepernick" and that if you don't like the country, then "get the Hell out!"
During a Sept. 23 interview on Dallas' 105.3 The Fan program, the host asked, “Where do you stand on this whole Colin Kaepernick issue?  Do you have a problem with Colin Kaepernick?”
Ditka, a two-time NFL Coach of the Year, said, "I think it's a problem when anybody who disrespects this country and the flag. If they don't like the country, they don't like our flag, get the Hell out! That’s what I think."
"So, if you’re asking me, I have no respect for Colin Kaepernick," said Ditka.  "He probably has no respect for me. That’s his choice."
"My choice is that I like this country, I respect our flag, and I don't see all the atrocities going on in this country that people say are going on," said Ditka, who coached the Chicago Bears to their victory in Super Bowl XX. 
Colin Kaepernick, when he was with the San Francisco 49ers, kneels in protest during the nationla anthem. (thestar.com)
"I see opportunities, if people want to look for opportunity," said Ditka.  "Now, if they don't want to look for them, then you can find problems with anything."
"But this is the land of opportunity because you can be anything you want to be, if you work.," he said. "Now, if you don't work, that's a different problem."
Ditka, 77, is married and has four children
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/ditka-you-dont-country-get-hell-out-i-have-no-respect-kaepernick

"TURN OFF EVERY BIT OF ENTERTAINMENT THAT IS AGAINST OUR AMERICAN WAY "

NFL Veteran: ‘Turn Off Every Bit of Entertainment That Is Against Our American Way’

By Craig Bannister | September 29, 2017 | 1:33 PM EDT


Ownes won a Super Bowl with the Oakland Raiders in 1980.
“Americans are standing up and doing the right thing” by turning off National Football League (NFL) games if the league won’t respect the National Anthem, says Burgess Owens, a ten-year NFL veteran who won a Super Bowl with the Oakland Raiders.
Owens, who played safety for the Oakland Raiders and New York Jets over his NFL career (1973-82), is now an author and a co-host of the Conservative Commandos radio show. In an interview with CNSNews.com on the program, Owens said the liberal-run league has gone “too far” by allowing Anthem protests. He voiced support for the Media Research Center’s campaign to boycott NFL games, and said television viewers should turn off all anti-American programs:
“We have to be strong. This is the one area, this is a bridge too far. They’ve taken away God out of the public venue, they’ve destroyed the Black community, the Black family, they’ve taken away our history – this is a bridge too far when want to take away the pride in our country.
“So, Americans are standing up and doing the right thing. We’re going to turn off every bit of entertainment that is against our American way. And, they will eventually pick up on it by the dollars that’s not coming to them, anymore.
“Maybe, even a Congress who can get them off the public dole. Enough time of the billionaires to be getting subsidized from tax dollars - enough.”
A boycott of all anti-American content will prompt the NFL to stop trying to push socialism on the American public, Owens said:
“So, if we start doing the things we need to do, believe me, they will find their way back to capitalism instead of trying to get us to get into socialism.”
Owens full comment is presented below.
"Exactly. The American flag – and thank goodness I grew up in an area where seventy percent of black men were doing what they’re supposed to do: they were in the home, teaching, mentoring, disciplining, making sure we respected women – they were doing all the right things.
"They had just returned from World War II, my dad did, and they believed. I would walk to school early, five miles away, and learned to raise and lower the flag, and was taught never let it touch the ground or be desecrated. So, it was a different era.
"And, I think it’s now time for us to recognize that it’s about hope. This whole concept, this whole conversation about hope. Do we give our kids hope that, yes, tomorrow’s a better day – and, yes, if I can do it, you can do it?
"Or, do we allow the communists and the socialists and the Marxists to take over and give them hopelessness? There’s a reason why, in the black community, for the eight years, there’s not been any conversation about the hopelessness of our community.
"The fact is, we represent only thirteen percent of our country’s population, but forty percent of violent crime is committed by young, Black Americans. There is hopelessness that the Obama Administration and the Left is not going to point to. Instead, they point to racism – other people being racist. We’re sick and tired of what they’re doing to the community.
"So, we have to be strong. This is the one area, this is a bridge too far. They’ve taken away God out of the public venue, they’ve destroyed the Black community, the Black family, they’ve taken away our history – this is a bridge too far when want to take away the pride in our country.
"So, Americans are standing up and doing the right thing.
We’re going to turn off every bit of entertainment that is against our American way. And, they will eventually pick up on it by the dollars that’s not coming to them, anymore.
"Maybe, even a Congress who can get them off the public dole. Enough time of the billionaires to be getting subsidized from tax dollars - enough.
"So, if we start doing the things we need to do, believe me, they will find their way back to capitalism instead of trying to get us to get into socialism."
 https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/craig-bannister/nfl-veteran-turn-every-bit-entertainment-against-our-american-way

My comments: Mr.Owens' admonition is exactly right for every Christian. If we realy love God more than our so called Entertainment, we will Turen Off all that is Against America and God.

HUGH HEFNER LED A REVOLUTION IN 'DIRECT REBELLION AGAINST GOD'S WORD'

Rev. Graham: Hugh Hefner Led a Revolution in 'Direct Rebellion Against God's Word'


Michael W. Chapman
 By Michael W. Chapman | September 29, 2017 | 2:17 PM EDT

Rev. Franklin Graham. (BGEA)
Commenting on the death of Playboy pornographer Hugh Hefner, who claimed he wanted to be known as one of the major leaders of the sexual revolution, Christian minister Franklin Graham said that revolution was "in direct rebellion against God's Word and His laws," and added that where we spend eternity -- in Heaven or Hell -- is "what matters most."
In a Sept. 28 post on Facebook, Rev. Graham, son of pastor Billy Graham, said, “Hugh Hefner, who died yesterday, was asked by The New York Times in 1992 what he was most proud of in his life. 
His answer? ‘That I changed attitudes toward sex…That I decontaminated the notion of premarital sex. That gives me great satisfaction.’
Hugh Hefner and three of his "playmates." (Screenshot: YouTube) 
"He wanted to be known as the one responsible for the sexual revolution," said Rev. Graham.  "That’s a sobering thought."
"This was a revolution in direct rebellion against God’s Word and His laws," he said. 
"News reports also said that Hefner paid $75,000 years ago for the vault next to Marilyn Monroe so that he could ‘spend eternity with Playboy’s first cover girl,'" said Rev. Graham. 
He continued, "This is a reminder to realize that where our soul—not our casket—is going to spend eternity is what matters most. That will be only one of two places—Heaven or Hell."
"Trusting Jesus Christ as Savior by faith is the only way to Heaven," said rev. Graham.  "God is the ultimate judge."
https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/rev-graham-hefner-led-revolution-direct-rebellion-against-gods-word.
My comments: Hefner was a obedient servant of Satan, helping him send Millions to Hell.

COURT: CHEERLEADERS CAN PUT 'CHRIST' ON FOOTBALL GAME BANNERS

Bible verse banner. Image courtesy Liberty Institute


WND

COURT: CHEERLEADERS CAN PUT 'CHRIST' ON FOOTBALL GAME BANNERS

Ruling confirms earlier opinion that school cannot censor private speech

Bob Unruh
A state appeals court has ruled that cheerleaders in a northeast Texas school district have the right to put Bible verses, such as “I can do all things through CHRIST which strengthens me,” on the paper, run-through banners they hold at football games.
The lengthy case dates back to 2012, when the the Kountze Independent School District claimed the banners were government speech and could be censored.
The cheerleaders disagreed, and have had their position affirmed by a number of courts, including the Texas Supreme Court, which sent the case back to a lower court for final disposition.
“We find the cheerleaders’ speech on the pregame run-through banners cannot be characterized as government speech,” said the opinion from the Ninth District of Texas Court of Appeals.
The district’s former superintendent, Kevin Weldon, had “issued a decree that prohibited the cheerleaders from including religious messages on run-through banners used at the beginning of high school football games,” the court found.
The straightforward complaint by the cheerleaders got tangled up when the district announced it would allow the banners at that time, but it still claimed to have control over that speech.
Subsequent rulings, up to the state Supreme Court, sided with the cheerleaders, and the latest appeals court ruling came on remand from that body.
“The central disagreement between the cheerleaders and Kountze ISD has revolved around the question of whether the cheerleaders’ run-through banners are, for the purposes of free speech law, ‘government speech’ as maintained by the school district, or ‘private speech’ as claimed by the cheerleaders,” the opinion said.
“Kountze ISD asserts that the run-through banners are prepared by the Kountze High School cheerleaders, an official school organization, at their school-sponsored, school-supervised practices on school property. The cheerleaders generally are required to prepare and display the banners as part of their duties. The banners are displayed on government property (the football stadium), in an area that is not generally accessible to the public (the football field), and at a time when a limited number of individuals are allowed on the field (players, cheerleaders, coaches, staff and band members). The cheerleader sponsors (paid school district employees) have the right to control the content and review and approve each of the banners.
“On the other hand, the cheerleaders contend that a single, dispositive fact controls the categorization of speech of the run-through banners: the school district allows the cheerleaders to select the message that is placed on the banners.”
The opinion found, “Because the students select the message each week and not the school, the statements on the run-through banners must be categorized as pure private speech of the cheerleaders.”
WND reported a year ago when the state Supreme Court returned the case to the lower courts to affirm the cheerleaders’ speech rights, Kelly Shackelford, president of Liberty Institute, which represented the cheerleaders, called it a “victory for the free speech and religious liberty rights of all Texas students.”
James Ho, the lead appellate counsel, said that at “a time when religious liberty is under assault nationwide, this ruling is a welcome reminder that the Constitution protects people of faith – and a welcome rebuke to government agencies that try to play games with our rights.”
WND reported Sens. John Cornyn, R-Ariz., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, had filed a brief in support of the cheerleaders. Cornyn, chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, was a district judge, a member of the Supreme Court of Texas and attorney general of Texas.
He argued on behalf of the state of Texas in the Santa Fe Independent School District case that is being cited by the school district for its right to censor student messages.
Cruz, meanwhile, previously was solicitor general of Texas, representing the state in a number of religious liberty cases.
The cheerleaders for years had made “run-through” paper banners for their team on personal time and with their own funds. They always chose the messages. In 2012, the Bible verses were used until the Freedom From Religion Foundation objected, and the district banned them.
The cheerleaders sued, and the district suddenly reversed itself, saying it would allow the cheerleaders to continue with their messages. But school officials insisted they still would retain control over the messages, leaving future practice uncertain.
The cheerleaders won the initial battle at the trial court in 2013. The school district appealed the decision, claiming the cheerleaders’ banners are government speech and, therefore, subject to censorship and prohibition at the school’s discretion. The ACLU then joined the district, filing a brief on its behalf.
The mid-level court adopted the mootness argument from the district, a ruling that later was reversed.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/09/court-cheerleaders-can-put-christ-on-football-game-banners/

LEFTISTS SLAP 'HATE' LABEL ON WOMAN FOR TALKING ABOUT SOCIALISM

hate

WND EXCLUSIVE

LEFTISTS SLAP 'HATE' LABEL ON WOMAN FOR TALKING ABOUT SOCIALISM

'I am calling on SPLC to stop engaging in the game of identity fear politics'

Bob Unruh
The far-left Southern Poverty Law Center has labeled the Family Research Council, Ben Carson, Liberty Counsel and other family organizations as “haters” simply because they don’t subscribe to the organization’s pro-homosexual and pro-abortion agenda. They were embarrassed by the Carson designation and later withdrew it.
But now the SPLC has slammed a new target: Hannah Scherlacher, the program coordinator and a contributor for the Leadership Institute’s CampusReform.org.
For, believe it or not, talking about socialism.
“I am calling on SPLC to remove me from this list and stop engaging in the game of identity fear politics,” she said in a statement released Friday by Liberty Counsel.
“I urge all Americans who have been bullied, silenced, and pushed into a corner by radical groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center to push back too.”
She reports on left-wing abuse and bias on America’s colleges campuses.
“It’s an understatement to say that I was dumbfounded as to how I ended up on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s LGBTQ hate-list – I have never said or done anything to indicate hate for the LGBTQ community. When I called to inquire, SPLC informed me that I am guilty because I did a radio interview with Family Research Council Radio (FRC). The segment was about socialism, but because FRC holds traditional family values, I was labeled an LGBT-hater just for being a guest on the show. No LGBT topics even came-up,” she said.
Liberty Counsel noted the SPLC includes a long list of family organizations on its “hate” list and lumps them with violent groups like the KKK and white supremacists.
“The SPLC refuses to include left-leaning organizations that do engage in or have a history of violence, including antifa,” Liberty Counsel’s report said. “The SPLC’s false labeling is a self-promoted fundraising tool that has dangerous consequences. Floyd Lee Corkins III confessed that he relied upon the SPLC ‘hate list’ in his assault on the Family Research Council.
Scherlacher continued, “Nowhere is the danger more real than on our college campuses where antifa, By Any Means Necessary, and other domestic terror groups (which are not found on any SPLC hate list) now feel emboldened to attack conservative students and shut down events under the guise of – ironically – fighting fascism, hate and white supremacism. Two Berkeley students recently spoke to Martha MacCallum about being targeted, stalked and physically assaulted by antifa for being members of the College Republicans club.”
“Hannah Scherlacher is helping to expose bias and left-wing abuse on America’s college campuses and now she has become one of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s ‘hate list’ victims,” said Mat Staver, chairman of Liberty Counsel. “Neither Hannah Scherlacher [n]or Family Research Council engage in or have a history of violence or hate. The SPLC has labeled them because FRC promotes traditional family values.”
WND reported weeks ago that the SPLC, which had been named in at least two lawsuits recently over its alleged defamation of conservatives, was unhappy with Fox News.
It claimed the network was “inaccurate, defamatory, and irresponsible.”
The letter from SPLC spokesman James Knoepp to Fox complained that a report on “The Five” incorrectly stated that the organization, with assets in the hundreds of millions of dollars, “provided just $61,000 in ‘legal assistance.'”
SPLC claimed that was its “internal legal services” and that it actually “spent more than $1.8 million on out-of-pocket case costs for litigation brought on behalf of its clients.”
“Wait, so SPLC is angry at Fox News because people are ‘attacking’ them for wrongly calling them hate groups? Huh. Funny that,” said a post at Twitchy, which monitors Twitter.
SPLC said it is “currently facing a coordinated attack by far-right extremist groups we’ve named as hate groups because they vilify the LGBT community, immigrants and Muslims.”
Twitchy continued, “Maybe if the SPLC didn’t deliberately and wrongfully accuse people of being hate groups?
“Folks don’t seem to have a whole lot of sympathy for them … heh,” said Twitchy, citing Ex-GOP Greg’s comment, “You guys are a joke, and a fraud.”
Multiple writers cited cases in which SPLC has issued “hate” labels, which, in their opinion, were wrong.
“Stop whining,” wrote John Doiron. “You’re attacking normal Americans who don’t buy into you racialist agenda. You are frauds who got caught.”
“Truth hurts,” added Twitchy.
SPLC’s list of “hate groups” has made news in months.
Michael Farris, president and general counsel for ADF, released a statement after Franken blasted ADF indirectly in his criticism of one of President Trump’s judicial nominees.
The Washington Times reported the senator’s mistake arose when he lobbed a charge at Amy Coney Barrett, a nominee for the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Franken complained that her decision to speak at an event sponsored by ADF makes her unfit to sit on a federal appeals court, because of SPLC’s listing of ADF as a “hate” organization.
Barrett, who has spent most of her career as a law professor at Notre Dame, said she hadn’t been aware of any controversy surrounding ADF.
Farris said it’s “deeply regrettable that Sen. Franken is misinformed about our work on behalf of religious freedom, something so ‘extreme’ that even seven justices of the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with our position three months ago in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Comer.”
“There is a real danger of conflating genuine hate groups, like the Ku Klux Klan, with mainstream religious beliefs that are shared by millions of Americans and people from all walks of life across the world. As a member of Congress, Sen. Franken needs to fact-check before parroting discredited attacks by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a once-proud civil rights organization that is now a left-wing smear machine known to incite violence,” he said.
“Alliance Defending Freedom is the largest religious liberty legal advocacy organization in the world and advocates for the freedom of all people – including Sen. Franken’s constituents – to peacefully live, speak, and work consistently with their convictions without fear of government punishment,” Farris said.
WND reported when Minnesota Majority probed Franken’s 312-vote victory in the U.S. Senate race in Minnesota in 2008. According to records, at least 341 convicted felons voted in Hennepin County, where Minneapolis is located, and another 52 voted illegally in Ramsey County, home to St. Paul.
“The number of felons voting in those two counties alone exceeds … Franken’s victory margin,” the organization reported.
Recently, WND reported conservative leaders sent an open letter to members of the media calling on them to stop using data from the “discredited Southern Poverty Law Center.”
The signers included L. Brent Bozell III of the Media Research Center, Edwin Meese III of the Heritage Foundation, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Lt. Gen. (Ret.) William Boykin of the Family Research Council, Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel and Michael Farris of Alliance Defending Freedom.
Their message to establishment media: Stop using the “hit pieces” from the Southern Poverty Law Center in your reporting.
Several conservative organizations, including the D. James Kennedy Ministries and Liberty Counsel, have gone to court over SPLC’s “hate” designation.
SPLC also has been linked to domestic terror, in the attack by Floyd Corkins on FRC headquarters in Washington, and the recent attempt by James Hodgkinson to assassinate Rep. Steve Scalise and other Republicans.
SPLC had slammed Scalise for his political views, and Hodgkinson had “liked” the SPLC on Facebook.
An announcement about the letter explains SPLC “has recklessly labeled dozens of mainstream conservative organizations as ‘hate groups.'”
The letter states: “We are writing to you as individuals or as representatives of organizations who are deeply troubled by several recent examples of the media’s use of data from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). The SPLC is a discredited, left-wing, political activist organization that seeks to silence its political opponents with a ‘hate group’ label of its own invention and application that is not only false and defamatory, but that also endangers the lives of those targeted with it.”
It was in June when SPLC supporter James Hodgkinson shot Scalise, R-La.; Zach Barth, a staff member for Rep. Roger Williams; former congressional staff member Matt Mika; and two U.S. Capitol Police officers at a practice for a charity baseball game.
SPLC had demonized Scalise for promoting white supremacy and inferred “that Rep. Scalise is a so-called ‘hater.'”
The FRC attacker, Corkins, cited SPLC as his inspiration for his going to the Washington offices of the Family Research Council, armed with a gun, intending to kill as many people as he could. He was stopped by a security guard, who was injured.
Security footage_ Hero thwarts terrorist shooter at Family R.mp4

SPLC has been so extreme it also got into trouble with the Disciplinary Counsel in the Office of the General Counsel of the Department of Justice under President Obama.
There, SPLC lawyers were sharply rebuked and reprimanded for employing its “hate group” on a conservative advocacy group. The counsel stated that using SPLC’s map “overstepped the bounds of zealous advocacy and was unprofessional.” It continued that such behavior is “uncivil” and “constitutes frivolous behavior and does not aid the administration of justice.”
Just days ago, talk-radio superstar Rush Limbaugh criticized SPLC as “perhaps one of the biggest hate groups on the left.”
“They tar and feather and slander right-wing groups and call them hate groups,” he said. “They’ve got a map on their website, and whenever a right-wing group that says or does anything that the Southern Poverty Law Center, which is a bunch of leftist freaks, all you have to do is disagree with them and you are called a hater.”
Conservatives pointed out that the Army has disassociated from SPLC materials, and the FBI removed the SPLC from a list of trusted resources on its “hate Crimes” page.
SPLC’s agenda also has been criticized as “incredible” by Rev. Franklin Graham, CEO and president of both Samaritan’s Purse and the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.
“A hate group? Can you believe this – the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Ala., has labeled a number of Christian groups such as D. James Kennedy Ministries, and the Family Research Council run by my good friend Tony Perkins as ‘hate’ groups. Why?” he wrote on a Facebook post.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/09/leftists-slap-hate-label-on-woman-for-talking-about-socialism/

FOUND: ELECTION COLLUSION BETWEEN FACEBOOK AND HILLARY

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.

WND

FOUND: ELECTION COLLUSION BETWEEN FACEBOOK AND HILLARY

Emails show strategizing over 2016 presidential race

Alicia Powe
WASHINGTON – Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg colluded with Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election campaign, charges WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.
Assange tweeted links to email exchanges between Clinton’s former campaign chairman, John Podesta, and Sandberg, demonstrating Sandberg used her position at the leading social networking site to promote Clinton’s candidacy.
“I still want HRC to win badly. I am still here to help as I can. She came over and was magical with my kids,” Sandberg wrote in an email to Podesta.
In another email, Podesta thanked Sandberg for assisting the Clinton campaign.
“Wishing you a happy New Year. 2015 was challenging, but we ended in a good place thanks to your help and support. Look forward to working with you to elect the first woman President of the United States,” Podesta wrote to the Facebook COO on Jan. 2, 2016.
In an email dated Aug. 7, 2015,  Zuckerberg asked Podesta to put him in touch with people he could collaborate with to assist Clinton with her bid for the presidency.
“I enjoyed spending time with you yesterday and our conversation gave me a lot to think about. Thanks for sharing your experiences with CAP and some of the choices you made as you put the organization together. I hope it’s okay if I reach out as my thinking develops to get your ideas and reactions.
“If there are any other folks you think I should talk to, please let me know. Thanks again”
Elliot Schrage, Facebook’s vice president of communications, revealed the Facebook founder strategized with Podesta to implement “structures” and “policies” to assure Clinton a victory.
“John, I wanted to add my personal thanks, too. Mark can be a demanding and inquisitive student, and he was both impressed and grateful for your time and candor. He’s begun a challenging journey to direct his wealth to have an impact as great as Facebook and your ideas and perspectives really moved his thinking. 
I know he was focused on the kinds of structures he should put together, but now I suspect he’ll be paying more attention to the types of people he needs – policy entrepreneurs and strategists – as he thinks about next steps,” Elliot wrote in an Aug. 7, 2015, email. “Any and all suggestions are welcome among folks you know or have worked with.”
As U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller investigates claims Trump colluded with Russia to rig the 2016 presidential election, FBI officials are pressing to broaden the scope of the probe by investigating Facebook’s role in the election.
Mueller is examining potentially illegal Facebook ad sales to Russian entities in the lead-up to the election.
FBI sources have asserted that Zuckerberg and Facebook executives were aware for almost two years that Russian entities were purchasing ads but failed to report the illegal activities to federal authorities.
Other foreign entities, Ukraine and China, were running similar ad schemes through Facebook, the FBI sources claim.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/09/found-election-collusion-between-facebook-and-hillary/