Wednesday, May 31, 2017

HEINEKEN TOASTS 'BORDERLESS WORLD' IN NEW AD CAMPAIGN

Heineken borderless world ad campaign


WND EXCLUSIVE

HEINEKEN TOASTS 'BORDERLESS WORLD' IN NEW AD CAMPAIGN

Not the 1st company to use beer to promote globalist agenda

Can national governments and national sovereignty be eliminated with the cooperation of Joe Six Pack?
The brewers of Heineken beer think so, and they’re laying it all on the line in their new ad campaign.
The Amsterdam, Netherlands-based Heineken Brewery is not only selling beer but a borderless world in the campaign, which provides the following meme right on the beer’s label.
“Here’s to an Open World: To a world without borders or barriers. To the belief that there’s more that unites us than divides us. To finding common ground. So raise a bottle with the person next to you. Because a stranger is just a friend you haven’t had a cold Heineken with yet. Open your world.”
Memorial Day is a big weekend for beer sales, but the “open borders” theme probably wasn’t the most effective way to lure new customers just a week after Europe’s open borders policy led to the slaughter of 22 women and girls by a Libyan terrorist in Manchester, England.
Blogger Sierra Marlee at Right Wing News noted that advocating for open borders “right on the bottle of their sub-par beer,” could not have been more ill-timed following the Manchester bombing at an Ariana Grande concert.
“If you have the misfortune of visiting a friend or family member with questionable taste in adult beverages, you might be forced to choke down some progressive politics with your Heineken,” she writes. “As you wonder if the drink in your hand was made with real horse urine or artificial flavoring, you might catch a glimpse of the ridiculously idealistic message on the side of the bottle.”
The message on the bottle is also backed up with a TV commercial from Heineken.
“It shows their ignorance of Islam,” said Ann Corcoran, author of the Refugee Resettlement Watch blog. “We’re  not going to be sitting down and knocking down a pint with our Muslim neighbors. As a matter of fact, there will be no beer companies when the Netherlands becomes a Muslim-majority nation.”
William Gheen, president and founder of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, pointed out that Heineken is not the only corporation pushing the globalist agenda of open borders. In fact, there are several other beer companies on the bandwagon.
“Why is it that Americans can’t enjoy a TV show, a beer, use a social-media website or buy something online without being lectured by or contributing to some global socialist cause?” Gheen asked.
“There is a massive political campaign coming at Americans through all channels pushing the same globalist agenda where they want to destroy the nation states and replace our way of life and form of governance with their elitist globalist control,” Gheen said.
He noted that similar open-borders propaganda has flowed from the company that makes Negro Modelo beer, preaching about the wonders of immigration into the U.S. through Texas.
Tecate, another Mexican beer maker, made a commercial last year against building a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.
“This reminds me of the scandal back in 2008 when Absolut Vodka got in a lot of hot water with Americans over their ‘In an Absolut World’ ad that used maps showing about one-third of the USA returned to Mexico,” Gheen said.
In October 2015, Germany’s leaders openly feared that beer and Muslim migrants might make a bad mix during the country’s Oktoberfest celebrations.
It is against Shariah, or Islamic law, to consume alcohol. And since more than 90 percent of the migrants flowing into Europe have been Muslim, offering them a beer would be more of an insult than a welcoming gesture of good will.
Noting this fact, Clare Lopez, vice president of research and analysis for the Washington-based think tank Center for Security Policy, mocked the stupidity of the Heineken ad in an emailed response to WND.
“Dear Heineken, drinking alcohol is punished by 80 lashes under Islamic Law. Please, let’s do open the borders and welcome to the Caliphate! Sincerely, the Islamic State.”
But despite the fact that its product doesn’t mix well with the Islamic invasion of Europe, Canada and the United States, Heineken feels compelled to push the narrative.
Heineken is pushing the same globalist vision of former President Obama, who scolded the Trump administration over the weekend saying “we cannot hide behind walls,” and of Hillary Clinton, who claimed “diversity is our strength” and “terrorism has nothing to do with Islam.”
United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres said global terrorism is “fueled by Islamophobia,” and former Secretary of State John Kerry lectured graduates of Northeastern University one year ago, saying “prepare for a borderless world.”
The State Department leaked to the New York Times that it will ramp up refugee resettlement from about 830 refugees a week in the first three weeks of this month to more than 1,500 per week by next month. Tens of thousands of refugees are waiting to come to the United States from dozens of countries throughout the Third World.
In an email, Jennifer L. Smith, a department official, wrote that the refugee groups could begin bringing people to the United States “unconstrained by the weekly quotas that were in place.”
Refugee groups now predict that entries into the United States could increase so rapidly that the total number of refugees admitted by Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year, could exceed 70,000. That is the same level at which Obama brought in refugees for most of his term in office.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/heineken-toasts-borderless-world-in-new-ad-campaign/
My comments: Since the Courts now RULE America, and there is No National Security, what hope is their for America? The Presidency and the Congress are Unwilling to step up and Protect America from the Islamic Invasion. So, the Slaughter will continue, with Heineken a Cheerleader for it, and as their own Country Surrenders to Islam. APPALLING!

DID DEMS' 'RUSSIAN CONNECTIONS' CLAIM JUST DISINTEGRATE?

Ex-CIA Director John Brennan


WND

DID DEMS' 'RUSSIAN CONNECTIONS' CLAIM JUST DISINTEGRATE?

Man who started investigation admits no evidence and has been caught lying to Congress

Bob Unruh
Did the Democrats’ orchestrated attempt to catch the Trump administration in a major scandal with Russia just blow up?
The Washington Times reported it was President Obama’s CIA director, John Brennan, who prompted the investigation into claims the Trump campaign had inappropriate contacts with the Russian government.
But that’s the same John Brennan who, like other top Democrats, has stated he has seen no evidence of collusion with the Russians, and the same John Brennan who, among the other indiscretions, was caught lying to Congress.
The Times reported on Memorial Day that the reason the Obama administration last summer started investigating the Trump campaign “has come into clearer focus following a string of congressional hearings on Russian interference in the presidential election.”
“It was then-CIA Director John O. Brennan, a close confidant of Mr. Obama’s, who provided the information – what he termed the ‘basis’ – for the FBI to start the counterintelligence investigation last summer. Mr. Brennan served on the former president’s 2008 presidential campaign and in his White House,” the report said.
The Times reported Brennan told the House Intelligence Committee on May 23 “that the intelligence community was picking up tidbits on Trump associates making contacts with Russians.’
But Brennan did not name either the Russians or the Trump people, and he indicated he did not know what was said.
“But he said he believed the contacts were numerous enough to alert the FBI, which began its probe into Trump associates that same July, according to previous congressional testimony from then-FBI director James B. Comey,” the Times said.
The paper aid the FBI probe of contacts “came the same month the intelligence community fingered Russian agents as orchestrating hacks into Democratic Party computers and providing stolen emails to WikiLeaks.”
“Mr. Brennan, who has not hidden his dislike for Mr. Trump, testified he briefed the investigation’s progress to Mr. Obama, who at the time was trying to aid Hillary Clinton in her campaign.”
But WND reported earlier this month Brennan told the House Intelligence Committee he did not know of any evidence of collusion, coordination or conspiracy between Trump and the Russian government.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., former director of national intelligence James Clapper and former acting CIA Director Michael Morell also have stated they have seen no evidence of collusion.
At the time, Brennan said he had seen some Trump campaign operatives making contact with Russia, and he was worried it might lead to collusion. In response, the Obama administration surveilled the Trump team and had the FBI launch an investigation.
“I know what the Russians try to do,” testified Brennan. “They try to suborn individuals and they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, either wittingly or unwittingly.”
“And I was worried,” he continued, “by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons and so, therefore, by the time I left office on Jan. 20, I had unresolved questions in my mind as to whether or not the Russians had been successful in getting U.S. persons, involved in the campaign or not, to work on their behalf, again, either in a witting or unwitting fashion.”
Nonetheless, Brennan concluded, “I felt as though the FBI investigation was certainly well-founded and needed to look into those issues.”
But WND also reported that when Brennan was urging Congress to investigate, he didn’t mention that he, himself, had colluded with Russia on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Nor was his admission to having voted for a Communist Party candidate in the 1976 election ever mentioned.
Nor was the fact a 2012 WikiLeaks email dump pointed to him “as the person behind the ‘witch hunt’ of journalists who reported unflattering Obama administration leaks.”
Nor was his refusal to use a Bible, as tradition prescribes, when he was sworn into office.
Nor was his graduate thesis in which he denied the existence of “absolute human rights” and said government censorship of speech was an appropriate management tool.
Nor was his insistence that people not use the word “jihadist” to describe terrorists.
Nor was his lying to Congress.
A lie
It was a columnist for the Guardian of London who, in 2014, detailed Brennan’s lie about the claims that the CIA was spying on U.S. Senate staffers.
“John Brennan blatantly lied to the American public. Again,” wrote columnist Trevor Timm.
“The facts will come out,” Brennan told NBC News in March after Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., condemned the CIA on the Senate floor, accusing his agency of hacking into the computers used by her intelligence committee’s staffers.
“Let me assure you the CIA was in no way spying on [the committee] or the Senate,” he said, the paper reported
But Timm noted: “After the CIA inspector general’s report completely contradicted Brennan’s statements, it now appears Brennan was forced to privately apologize to intelligence committee chairs in a ‘tense’ meeting earlier this week. Other senators on Thursday pushed for Brennan to publicly apologize and called for an independent investigation.”
And the report noted, at the time, something else about Brennan, his support for torture.
“That spying scandal, as well as the one Brennan has actually owned up to, both spawn from the Senate’s damning 6,000-page report on CIA torture, part of which is supposed to be publicly released any day now. The document will serve as yet another reminder that Brennan, when he worked in the CIA during the Bush years, supported many of the barbaric techniques used on prisoners after 9/11, which the Obama administration claims to oppose.”
Timm continued: “Lest we forget, Brennan’s most recent false statement is not his first James Clapper-esque experiment in misinformation. The nation’s top spy is, in fact, a proficient and skilled liar. As Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser for his entire first term in the White House, Brennan built, oversaw, executed and excused America’s robotic assassination program. During a speech in 2011, the keeper of the kill list said there had not been ‘a single collateral death’ from U.S. drone strikes because of their ‘exceptional proficiency [and] precision’.”
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, however, confirmed that a single U.S. drone strike had killed 42 Pakistanis, “most of them civilians.”
Brennan’s own scandal
Earlier this year, George Neumayr in the American Spectator suggested there was collusion between Russia and an American campaign – Clinton’s.
“One side did collude with foreign powers to tip the election – Hillary’s,” he wrote. “Seeking to retain his position as CIA director under Hillary, Brennan teamed up with British spies and Estonian spies to cripple Trump’s candidacy.
“He used their phone intelligence as a pretext for a multi-agency investigation into Trump, which led the FBI to probe a computer server connected to Trump Tower and gave cover to Susan Rice, among other Hillary supporters, to spy on Trump and his people.”
Neumayer said Brennan’s CIA “operated like a branch office of the Hillary campaign, leaking out mentions of this bogus investigation to the press in the hopes of inflicting maximum political damage on Trump.”
An official in the intelligence community told the Spectator that Brennan’s “retinue of political radicals didn’t even bother to hide their activism, decorating offices with ‘Hillary for president cups’ and other campaign paraphernalia.”
The Spectator cited a London Guardian report that the criminal leaks against Trump originated in the British press, including claims from Estonia that the Kremlin was funneling cash to the Trump campaign.
“Any other CIA director would have disregarded such a flaky tip, recognizing that Estonia was eager to see Trump lose (its officials had bought into Hillary’s propaganda that Trump was going to pull out of NATO).”
As WND reported, speaking on MSNBC on March 2, former deputy assistant Secretary of Defense Evelyn Farkas inadvertently confirmed the former president’s administration spied on Trump’s transition team for political purposes and that she helped leak the information.
“I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open, and I knew that there was more,” she said. “We have very good intelligence on Russia. So then I had talked to some of my former colleagues, and I knew they were trying to also get information to the Hill.
“That’s why you have the leaking.”
However, intelligence chiefs who have seen the classified information in question, including Obama’s own former director of national intelligence, James Clapper. and former acting CIA Director Michael Morell, said days later they had seen no evidence of collusion between the Trump team and the Russian government.
That meant Farkas’ objective could only have been to damage Trump politically.
Communist link
WND founder and CEO Joseph Farah outlined last year how Brennan admitted to support for a communist candidate.
“Brennan recalled undergoing one of the first tests he would endure for a top security clearance, including a polygraph. He was asked the standard question: ‘Have you ever worked with or for a group that was dedicated to overthrowing the U.S.?'” he wrote.
Brennan’s response? “I froze. This was back in 1980, and I thought back to a previous election where I voted, and I voted for the Communist Party candidate. … I froze, because I was getting so close to coming into CIA and said, ‘OK, here’s the choice, John. You can deny that, and the machine is probably going to go, you know, wacko, or I can acknowledge it and see what happens.'”
Explained Farah: “He once voted for unrepentant Stalinist Gus Hall, the presidential nominee of the Communist Party USA. Today he remains in a love affair with all things Islam. If you doubt what I am saying, I submit here for your own judgment a three-minute video of a speech he gave in 2010 in which he extols the beauty of the religion of peace – in flawless Arabic:”
WikiLeaks and more
In 2013, Breitbart reported, “An obscure November 2012 WikiLeaks email dump points to former White House counterterrorism adviser and now-CIA chief John Brennan as the person behind the ‘witch hunt’ of journalists who reported unflattering Obama administration leaks.”
It explained: “A little over a week after President Barack Obama’s reelection, WikiLeaks released an email dump of global intelligence files from the private intelligence company Stratfor. One particular email, dated September 21, 2010 discussed President Obama’s ‘Leak Investigations.'”
It identified Brennan.
“When Obama security adviser John Brennan was sworn into office as chief of the Central Intelligence Agency, he put his hand not on a Bible, but on a copy of the Constitution – before it included the Bill of Rights,” the report said.
“The White House said of the controversial appointee, whose position in office was filibustered by Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul this week for nearly 13 hours, ‘Brennan was sworn in with his hand on an original draft of the Constitution, dating from 1787, which has George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it.'”
“When Brennan vowed to protect and defend the Constitution, he was swearing on one that did not include the First, Fourth, Fifth, or Sixth Amendments – or any of the other amendments now included in our Constitution,” one blogger pointed out. “The Bill of Rights did not become part of our Constitution until 1791, four years after the Constitution that Brennan took his oath on.
“Another angle on why Brennan might not have wanted to swear his oath on the Bible relates to a shocking report by one of the FBI’s former top experts on Islam, who says Brennan actually converted to Islam years ago while living in Saudi Arabia,” the report continued.
As WND reported, former FBI Islam expert John Guandolo has long warned that the federal government is being infiltrated by members of the radical Muslim Brotherhood. But Guandolo now warns that by appointing Brennan to CIA director, Obama has not only chosen a man “naïve” to these infiltrations, but also picked a candidate who is himself a Muslim.
“Mr. Brennan did convert to Islam when he served in an official capacity on the behalf of the United States in Saudi Arabia,” Guandolo told interviewer and radio host Tom Trento.
“That fact alone is not what is most disturbing,” Guandolo continued. “His conversion to Islam was the culmination of a counterintelligence operation against him to recruit him. The fact that foreign intelligence service operatives recruited Mr. Brennan when he was in a very sensitive and senior U.S. government position in a foreign country means that he either [is] a traitor … [or] he has the inability to discern and understand how to walk in those kinds of environments, which makes him completely unfit to be the director of Central Intelligence.”
Brennan did indeed serve as CIA station chief in Riyadh in the 1990s and he has held the official title of Deputy National Security Adviser for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. On Jan. 7, Obama nominated Brennan as the next director of the CIA.
A former Marine and combat veteran, Guandolo worked for eight years in the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division as a subject-matter expert on the Muslim Brotherhood and the global spread of Islamism. Guandolo boasts he created the Bureau’s first counter-terrorism training/education program and twice received United States Attorney’s Awards for investigative intelligence.
It was then-WND columnist Diana West who pointed out his empathy toward “jihad.”
“What’s so scary about Brennan, currently President Obama’s top adviser for counterterrorism?” she asked, while Brennan was being nominated for the CIA post.
“More than any other Obama administration official, Brennan has openly cultivated groups in this country that I describe, with good reason, as being of the jihadist persuasion. Simultaneously, Brennan misinforms or dissembles about the nature of jihad itself. How can such a man helm America’s premier intelligence institution, which, at least ostensibly, is engaged in thwarting jihad?”
She continued: “His reaction is much the same when it comes to what is called, in military parlance, the ‘enemy threat doctrine.’ Take jihad. We must not ‘describe our enemy as ‘jihadists’ or ‘Islamists,” Brennan said in 2010, ‘because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one’s community.'”
Too much freedom?
He said “inflammatory articles” in the media can provoke violence, so “some degree of government censorship” is appropriate.
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/did-dems-russian-connections-claim-just-disintegrate/
My comments: When a Nation abandons God and His Word, as America has, it becomes Completely Corrupt. God and His Word are the only things that Restrain the Madness of human beings and their Sin Nature.

VA SECRETARY: VA 'CLEARLY BROKEN' CONGRESS MUST ACT

 - The Washington Times - Updated: 12:18 p.m. on Wednesday, May 31, 2017
Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin said Wednesday that the agency is “still in critical condition” with patients waiting too long for services and a bureaucracy unable to fire poorly performing employees.
Mr. Shulkin, the only holdover from the Obama administration in President Trump’s Cabinet, urged Congress to give the agency more power to discipline employees and expand the Veterans Choice program that allows vets to get treatment from private-sector doctors and hospitals.
Current rules prevent the VA from suspending or firing employees in a timely manner, including a recent case where it took more than a month to fire a psychiatrist caught watching pornography on his iPad while seeing a veteran.
“Our accountability process are clearly broken,” said Mr. Shulkin, a physician.
He said that despite limitation in the law, the VA has moved to purge executives and others for poor performance and mismanagement.
The agency recently fired the medical director and other executives in the D.C. facility and the medical director and three other executive in the Shreveport, Louisiana, facility.
A pattern of negligent and mistreatment at VA hospitals came to light in 2014. A report by CNN found that at least 40 veterans died while on long waiting lists for care at a facility in Phoenix.
More problems emerged at facilities across the country, including secret waiting lists that were kept hidden by executives in order to collect bonus pay.
The Veterans Choice Program was created in response. The program, however, was opposed by Democrats who warned it was an attempt to privatize the VA.
“But that isn’t enough,” Mr. Shulkin said. “We need new accountability legislation and we need that now.”
The House passed a bill to make it easier to fire bad VA employees. The Senate has yet to act.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/31/david-shulkin-va-secretary-agency-clearly-broken/?utm_source=onesignal&utm_campaign=pushnotify&utm_medium=push

My comments: Americans should think of the VA when they think of Government Control of Health Care. It does not work.

TOP ECONOMIC ANALYST: REPUBLICANS ARE OUT OF TOUCH

(photo courtesy DonaldJTrump.com)


FROM JOSEPH FARAH'S G2 BULLETIN

TOP ECONOMIC ANALYST: 'REPUBLICANS HAVE LOST IT'

They think 'it will all be OK again' by getting rid of Trump

An economic analyst says the establishment GOP members in Washington are so far out of touch, they are endangering the country with their opposition to President Trump, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.
“The Republicans have lost it,” wrote analyst Martin Armstrong at his Armstrong Economics site recently.
“They think this ‘populism’ is over with [French president Emmanuel] Macron’s victory in France so it’s time to get rid of Trump and it will all be OK again.”
Not only are they wrong, their perspective is dangerous, he contends.
“I have never seen such an all out effort on a massive coordinated effort to reject the people’s demand for reform,” he wrote. “This is HIGHLY dangerous for we can very well move toward civil war.”
The bold-face emphasis was in the original.
“These people think getting rid of Trump and it will all be roses and raining money for them once again. They are DEAD wrong! Our model also warns that [the] United States can break up as a result of this by 2032-2040,” he said.
Exactly what’s going on?
“There is a very REAL plot to overthrow Trump, led by the political establishment and aided by the mainstream press,” he explained.
“This is not simply speculation – this is the real deal. 
Of course the Washington Post and New York Times are in full swing to get rid of Trump. No matter what it might be, the twist is always against Trump right down to the story how Sean Spicer wanted to see the pope because he’s a devote[d] Catholic and was denied.”
He continued: “CNN, of course, is also part of this conspiracy. 
You will NEVER find any positive article about Trump in mainstream media. … 
We have [former House Speaker John] Boehner coming out saying Trump is a disaster. This is the guy who threw people off committees if they did not vote for his agenda.”
He also cited the flap over Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and claims of a “back-channel” with Russia.
“The Kushner story is desperately trying to make something out of nothing. Here we have after Flynn’s removal, Kushner suggesting setting up a direct channel for diplomatic purposes regarding Syria with the Russians. That is entirely within reason and has been done during confrontations in the past.”
He continued: “This was only a suggestion. It was not done, yet the press twist this into somehow supporting Russia who single-handedly defeated Hillary and put Trump in office.”
The motive is clear, he said.
“They think if they can just keep selling that nonsense it will become a fact. The press seems to want war with Russia and absolutely nothing else.”
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/top-economic-analyst-republicans-have-lost-it/
My comments: Christians should understand that there are Republicans that are part of the godless. Socialist, Secular Humanist CABAL--Against God and His Word and against President Trump.

HUNDREDS OF TENS BRAWL ON JERSEY SHORE

Image result for photos of hundreds of teens brawling on Jersey shore

Hundreds of teens brawl on Jersey Shore



Three people were arrested after a fight involving 300 teenagers broke out on a New Jersey beach over the Memorial Day weekend — a situation that got “way out of hand,” according to the city’s mayor and police.
Police made the assault and disorderly conduct collars after the wild brawl erupted near the iconic Lucy the Elephant attraction in Margate on Saturday. Hours later, scores of teens descended on a local WaWa — leading to a dozen more arrests for underage drinking, marijuana possession and fighting, Philly.com reported.
“There’s not one of them from Margate,” Margate police Capt. Ken Bergeron said. “There were so many people fighting, they had to get help from Ventnor and Longport. They’re really disrespectful.”
Cellphone footage of the mayhem on the beach at Washington Avenue shows officers throwing a disorderly teen into the sand as witnesses shout in the background.
“Stop throwing sand,” one girl screams as officers handcuff two suspects.
Bergeron said police had few options to disperse the crowd at the convenience store later since curfew laws in the town are difficult to enforce.
“As long as they’re not blocking the sidewalk, there’s not much we can do,” he said. “WaWa has to call and let us know … It’s hard to post somebody there the whole time, especially during a holiday weekend.”
The situation with the large numbers of teens hanging out on streets, often late at night, has gotten “way out of hand,” Margate Mayor Mike Becker said.
“We welcome all visitors, but we can’t tolerate this behavior,” Becker said. “It was a mess. This is probably the third year we’ve had the same thing over Memorial Day weekend: total lack of respect for other people.”
http://nypost.com/2017/05/31/hundreds-of-teens-brawl-on-jersey-beach/

CHICAGO HAS A RECORD POLICE SUICIDE RATE

CHICAGO HAS A RECORD POLICE SUICIDE RATE 

Last year was the deadliest year in Chicago in 19 years with 762 murders, according to data from the Chicago Police Department. 
But residents aren't the only victims of the violence. According to an investigation by the Department of Justice, Chicago officers are committing suicide at an alarming rate.

"There were times where I truly thought I’d be better off dead than alive," said Officer Brian Warner, who was diagnosed with PTSD after fatally shooting a man in 2011.

In January, the Department of Justice released the findings from an investigation into the Chicago Police Department. Hidden between the findings of police brutality and excessive force was this:
"This would mean that CPD's officer suicide rate is more than 60% higher than the national average."
Department of Justice investigation
The report found that according to the police union, Fraternal Order of Police in Chicago, there were 29.4 suicides per 100,000 from 2013 to 2015.
The national average for police officers (when you take all individual studies into account) is 18.1, according to Radford University researchers.
For the record, the Chicago Police Department reports that the rate is 22.7 suicides per 100,000 department members.

Warner says he contemplated suicide after he was involved in a headline-making "critical incident."
A man he and his partner had apprehended and placed in the car held up a gun and shot Warner as Warner was driving. Warner's instinct was to shoot the man. The man later died.
Six years after that event, Warner has PTSD.

Immediately after the incident, he went to the Employee Assistance Program, but he felt the help they gave him wasn't enough.

"A mandatory one-time session and two days off to debrief. And then they say, 'OK, you can go back to work.' I don’t think that’s adequate," Warner said.
In lieu of therapy, "I self-medicated," Warner says. "I drank enough to fall asleep. Each night I’d go to work and through the motions."It wasn't until two years of sleepless nights after the incident that Warner was diagnosed with PTSD, upon a visit to the doctor.

"My doctors and I put together a whole protocol on how I could return back to work safely," said Warner. "We presented that to the city and the city chose to put me on disability instead of implementing the program."
Warner says he thinks the city didn't want to have to implement a robust program for others as well, which is exactly what he wanted to happen.http://circa.com/world/chicago-has-a-cop-suicide-problem-and-no-solution-just-yet

My comments: Chicago is a City controlled by the godless, Socialist, Secular Humanist Democrats. The Party that wants to IMPOSE their godless TYRANNY on the Nation.