Saturday, January 30, 2016

THE FOX FACEBOOK PAGE BOASTS 'LUCIFER IS WAITING FOR YOU NOW!

lucifer-is-here-fox-network-rupert-murdoch-antichrist-satanism-in-america-nteb-end-time-headlines

THE FOX FACEBOOK PAGE BOASTS ‘LUCIFER’S WAITING FOR YOU. TUNE INTO FOX RIGHT NOW!’

“How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!” Isaiah 14:12 (KJV)
Honestly, it’s crazy. Absolutely insane. Everywhere you look on social media, Fox is blowing the trumpet inviting you to welcome Lucifer into your homes. You can even live Tweet ‘questions for Lucifer’ when the show is running on Monday nights. The comments people are leaving on the Lucifer Facebook page are quite revealing:
  • Christy Smith Please don’t cancel. Because of religious crazy nuts. Love it. Lucifer new favorite show. Just waiting for the out cry.
  • Twayna Powell Love this show and how they put a face to Lucifer…. And the ascent was a killer….. And good eye candy…
  • Alex Vogelgesang Oh, and Lucifer has great taste in music
  • Janet De Vries Ergang The show was very good and quite amusing! I will watch it again next Monday.
  • Gina Brochu Oh man, the people who are offended by this show (Yes, Folks, it’s just moving pictures) or see Armageddon pointing its ugly face, should go to church and leave us alone 
  • Dayna Webb It was a funny show. If these religious nut jobs actually watched the show, they’d see that he is very respectful of God and refers to him as Father.
  • Michelle La Rue Buckingham LOVE IT!!! My husband and I never agree on t.v. shows, but we both loved this one!!
Fox’s new show is the very essence of Satanism in America. Make the Devil look good, give him a little bit of conscience for wider appeal, use the name Lucifer instead of Satan because we all know that “Lucifer” is when he was still a “good guy”. But that’s wrong. Lucifer was the bad guy by his own choice, a traitor like Judas was. Judas was with Jesus three and a half years but never a good guy, and neither was Lucifer.
You can see by the comments above that Fox has absolutely found it’s audience. They are counting on God-hating, anti-Bible atheists to push this show to the top. And there are no shortage of those people in America.
The Devil comes for one reason, and one reason only: “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” John 10:10 (KJV)
30 seconds after the Rapture, you will find the Fox Network 100% up and functioning, with hardly an employee missing.
The Devil takes care of his own.

EU LEADERS CHOOSE TO DEFEND MUSLIM MIGRANTS OVER THEIR RAPE VICTIMS

eu-leaders-say-no-link-between-muslim-migrant-rapefugees-sexual-assault-crimes-in-europe

EU LEADERS CHOOSE TO DEFEND MUSLIM MIGRANTS OVER THEIR RAPE VICTIMS

The attacks prompted a protest by hundreds of people, who waved German flags and carried banners with the slogan 'Rapefugees Not Welco

EU LEADERS INSIST THERE IS ‘NO LINK’ BETWEEN THE MIGRANT CRISIS AND NEW YEAR SEX ATTACKS IN COLOGNE – AND VOW TO BRING ABOUT AN END TO ‘FALSE ACCUSATIONS’

Since the invasion of Europe by the Muslim migrants, there have been seemingly endless reported sex attacks at the hands of refugees and/or asylum seekers. New Year’s Eve in Cologne, Germany resulted in nearly 1,000 complaints of sexual batteryby Muslim migrants. Yet, astonishingly, European leaders adamantly refuse to link these attacks and others with Muslim migrants, and have vowed to fight this association by any and all means possible.
GRAPHIC WARNING: This video shows the TRUTH of what is happening in Europe and contains scenes and language not suitable for children, liberals or those easily offended.
The Daily Mail UK reports that “there is ‘no link’ between the migrant crisis and the wave of sex attacks in Cologne during New Year celebrations, EU officials believe. The European Commission wants to remove ‘false associations’ between theincreasing number of some criminal acts and the arrival of migrants, documents show. Internal minutes taken at a cabinet meeting on January 13 suggest officials are also growing concerned about the possibility of a public backlash in relation to the attacks.”
Consider the following. Since October of 2015 there have been:
  • Two bomb threats
  • 450 fights
  • four rapes
  • more than 550 assaults
  • 22-year-old aid worker Alexandra Mezher was knifed to death at the child migrant centre where she worked in Molndal, Sweden
  • 1,000 complaints of sexual battery
  • 2 refugee centers burned to the ground
  • 1 million illegal Muslim migrants have crossed the borders of various countries
All this at the hands of the Muslim migrants. EU leaders are fighting mad, but they are mad at the victims! Insanity of this size and scale has not been seen in Europe since the days of Adolf Hitler.
Now you know why Angela Merkel begged Mark Zuckerberg to start censoring and banning people who post comments on Facebook that would expose the truth of the Muslim migrant rapefugee crisis.
Up is down, black is white, bad is good. Welcome to the new reality.
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/eu-leaders-choose-to-defend-muslim-migrants-over-their-rape-victims/

OBAMA TO MAKE FIRST VISIT TO A U.S. MOSQUE NEXT WEEK

 
President Obama will make the first visit during his presidency to a U.S. mosque, the White House announced Saturday, part of the administration’s push to promote religious tolerance at a time when rhetoric linking Islam with terrorism is growing.
On Wednesday, the president will visit the Islamic Society of Baltimore, a sprawling community center in the city’s western suburbs that serves thousands of people with a place of worship, a housing complex and schools, according to its website. It is one of the Mid-Atlantic region’s largest Muslim centers and describes itself as aspiring “to be the anchor of a growing Muslim community with diverse backgrounds, democratically governed, relating to one another with inclusiveness and tolerance, and interacting with neighbors in an Islamic exemplary manner.”
The president is making the visit “to celebrate the contributions Muslim Americans make to our nation and reaffirm the importance of religious freedom to our way of life,”  a White House official wrote in an email Saturday. “The President believes that one of our nation’s greatest strengths is our rich diversity and the very idea that Americans of different faiths and backgrounds can thrive together – that we’re all part of the same American family. As the President has said, Muslim Americans are our friends, and neighbors; our co-workers, and sports heroes – and our men and women in uniform defending our country.”
At the Islamic Society, the president will hold a roundtable discussion with community members, the official said.
The visit will be part of the tightrope-walking Obama has done during his presidency around Islam.
For years, Muslim Americans have lobbied him to visit a mosque, citing Islamophobia. At the same time, a segment of Obama’s critics have said since he took office that he is a Muslim pretending to be Christian, and that he plays down the religious aspect of Muslim extremism. Recent polls show that 29 percent of Americans and nearly 45 percent of Republicans think he is a Muslim. The visit comes in the last year of his presidency.
The possibility of a mosque visit came up again a month ago, when several prominent Muslim Americans met with senior White House officials to discuss concerns about rising hostility toward people of their faith. During that session _ which was attended by White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett, Domestic Policy Council director Cecilia Muñoz and deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes — the Islamic leaders asked for Obama to visit a mosque, ideally with former president George W. Bush.
Presidents rarely visit houses of worship, aside from when they have attended church for their own religious practices. Obama regularly attends religious services on key holidays. In May, he visited a synagogue for the first time as president.
In 2001, Bush visited the Islamic Cultural Center of Washington, six days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, where he declared, “Islam is peace,” and “the face of terror is not the true faith of Islam.”
While Islamophobia has been an issue for some time, particularly as the Islamic State has gained strength in Iraq and Syria, it intensified once Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates began calling for a halt to refugees from the Mideast after terrorist strikes in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif., late last year.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) and former Florida governor Jeb Bush (R) have suggested screening asylum seekers on the basis of religion and accepting only Christians. And in December, Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump called for a “total and complete shutdown” of the entry of Muslims to the United States “until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”
More broadly, Cruz and several other Republicans have criticized Obama and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for refusing to use the phrase “radical Islam” when discussing terrorist activities.
Obama has increasingly spoken out against the anti-Muslim rhetoric.
“When politicians insult Muslims, whether abroad or our fellow citizens, when a mosque is vandalized, or a kid bullied, that doesn’t make us safer,” he said during his State of the Union address this month. “That’s not telling it like it is. It’s just wrong. It diminishes us in the eyes of the world. It makes it harder to achieve our goals. It betrays who we are as a country.”
Speaking at the Israeli Embassy Wednesday night at the first Righteous Among Nations awards banquet held in the United States, the president said the impulse to stigmatize people of other faiths is “deep within us.”
“Too often, especially in times of change, especially in times of anxiety and uncertainty, we are too willing to give into a base desire to find someone else — someone different — to blame for our struggles,” the president said. “An attack on any faith is an attack on all of our faiths.”
The president is making the visit “to celebrate the contributions Muslim Americans make to our nation and reaffirm the importance of religious freedom to our way of life,” a White House official wrote in an email Saturday. “As the President has said, Muslim Americans are our friends, and neighbors; our co-workers, and sports heroes — and our men and women in uniform defending our country.”
The official added that the event, coming just days after Obama spoke out against anti-Semitism and right before his appearance at the National Prayer breakfast, amounts to “reaching out to our fellow Americans to let them know we’re here for each other, regardless of where they come from, or what they look like, or what faith they practice.  This is a message the President wants every American – of all faiths – to hear.”
One close watcher of the role of religion in presidential politics said the timing of events next week was not a coincidence and that the mosque visit would be a stark contrast with the anti-Muslim rhetoric coming from multiple leading GOP candidates.
“By linking those two events so closely — that’s politically significant,” said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to upset the administration.
It was not immediately clear why the White House selected the Islamic Society in Baltimore, although it has been the subject of threats in recent months. Baltimore County beefed up security there last spring after it received two phone threats, one citing a bomb and the other from someone threatening to “spill Muslim blood,” CBS Baltimore reported at the time.
It also is the mosque of the family of Adnan Syed, whose conviction for murder drew huge global interest when his story was told through the radio podcast “Serial.” The series was made because of the activism of a friend of Syed’s family from the Islamic Society, Rabia Chaudry, a Greenbelt lawyer who advises law enforcement about Islam, the Baltimore Sun reported in 2014.
Hoda Hawa, director of policy at the Muslim Public Affairs Council, an advocacy group that has been involved in discussions with the White House about a mosque visit, said the Islamic Society is “the average Joe mosque” — meaning it has no newsmaking components or leaders and perhaps had been chosen for that reason.
Obama has visited several mosques overseas but never one in this country while serving as president.
“I think it would be enormously comforting and also send a powerful message to Americans about recommitting to religious freedom — especially if we had Bush and Obama visit together,” Farhana Khera, executive director of Muslim Advocates, a legal advocacy group, said last month when she met with the president’s aides.
Obama’s relationship with American Muslims has been complicated. They are among his most enthusiastic backers, but some feel he has not done enough to address their concerns at a time of social unrest.
He has shown support for Muslims overseas, including the 2009 “New Beginning” speech in Cairo before the Arab Spring, and he has drawn praise — and intense criticism from conservatives — for declining to connect Islam and terrorism.
However, concern about profiling and domestic surveillance at mosques has escalated under Obama, and some Muslim leaders expressed concern last year when he held a key summit about violent extremism that focused significantly on Muslim extremism.
During his tenure, American Muslims have become more institutionally organized, and a wider diversity of Muslim perspectives have become public, including on issues such as Obama’s policies in Syria or the fact that the military detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, remains open. However, Hawa said, most Muslim organizations feel their voices have been heard much more under this administration.
“We have at least had a seat at the table, and that is a level of engagement we haven’t seen for some time,” she said. The end of the administration is a “critical point. We don’t know who will replace him, but regardless, we need to be involved in the conversation.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/01/30/obama-to-make-first-visit-of-his-presidency-to-a-u-s-mosque-next-week/
My comments: Obama is an Islamic Sympathizer at least. His own actions have demonstrated him to be Anti-Chrsit, Against God and His Word. It is not surprising, then, that he should be an Islamic Sympathizer as Islam is the most Anti-Chrsit Religion on earth. Islam is an Evil Religion base on the Koran that Incites Violence against Everyone, including its own. It has been that way from the beginning. Currently it is Wrecking Havoc throughout the World. 

OBAMA EMAILED CLINTON 18 TIMES--CLAIMED HE HAD NOT

22 Clinton Emails Deemed Too Classified to Be Made Public

WASHINGTON — The State Department on Friday said for the first time that “top secret” material had been sent through Hillary Clinton’s private computer server, and that it would not make public 22 of her emails because they contained highly classified information.
The department announced that 18 emails exchanged between Mrs. Clinton and President Obama would also be withheld, citing the longstanding practice of preserving presidential communications for future release. The department’s spokesman, John Kirby, said that exchanges did not involve classified information.
The disclosure of the top secret emails, three days before Iowans vote in the first-in-the-nation caucuses, is certain to fuel the political debate over the unclassified computer server that Mrs. Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, kept in her home. The State Department released another set of her emails on Friday night in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.
The top secret emails lent credence to criticism by Mrs. Clinton’s rivals in the presidential race of her handling of classified information while she was secretary of state from 2009 to 2013. It is against the law for officials to discuss classified information on unclassified networks used for routine business or on private servers, and the F.B.I. is looking into whether such information was mishandled.
The State Department said it had “upgraded” the classification of the emails at the request of the nation’s intelligence agencies. Mr. Kirby said that none of the emails had been marked at any level of classification at the time they were sent through Mrs. Clinton’s computer server.
Mrs. Clinton’s campaign responded forcefully, saying that the process of reviewing the emails “appears to be over-classification run amok.” A spokesman, Brian Fallon, said all of the emails should be released.
“We understand that these emails were likely originated on the State Department’s unclassified system before they were ever shared with Secretary Clinton, and they have remained on the department’s unclassified system for years,” Mr. Fallon said.
Neither Mr. Kirby nor other officials would discuss the emails now being withheld, but the classified emails include those cited in a letter sent to the Senate on Jan. 14 by the inspector general of the nation’s intelligence agencies, I. Charles McCullough III.
Mr. McCullough wrote that “several dozen emails” contained classified information, including some now determined to contain information at the “top secret/S.A.P.” level. That designation refers to “special access programs,” which are among the government’s most closely guarded secrets.
It was not clear whether those emails were written by Mrs. Clinton or, as has been more often the case with the thousands of emails released so far, were messages written by other State Department officials and forwarded by her closest aides.
Officials at the State Department have said the “upgrading” of the classification of Mrs. Clinton’s emails has been routine. Mr. Kirby said Friday that the classification review was “focused on whether they need to be classified today.”
Emails previously released by the State Department have been redacted because they were deemed to contain information that should not be made public. But the 22 top secret emails are the first to be withheld entirely.
The latest developments prompted new attacks on Mrs. Clinton from Republican presidential candidates. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, campaigning in Iowa, said the disclosure disqualified her to be president.
“If someone on my staff did what she did, you know what would happen?” he said. “They would be fired, and they would be prosecuted.”
Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said in a statement that it made no sense to her that “Secretary Clinton can be held responsible for email exchanges that originated with someone else.”
“The only reason to hold Secretary Clinton responsible for emails that didn’t originate with her is for political points, and that’s what we’ve seen over the past several months,” she added.
The Clinton campaign’s response has reflected an effort to highlight the selective judgments that can be involved in the classification process.
Mrs. Clinton, in an interview with NPR last week, suggested that at least one of the emails at issue included an article from The New York Times about the administration’s classified drone programs. It was not clear which article she was referring to; the use of drones has been the subject of numerous news reports and books.
“How a New York Times public article that goes around the world could be in any way viewed as classified, or the fact that it would be sent to other people off of the New York Times site, I think, is one of the difficulties that people have in understanding what this is about,” she said.
At the same time, she has acknowledged that it was a mistake to set up the private server.
The State Department and the intelligence agencies have been wrangling over the email review ever since Mr. McCullough, acting on the request of Republican members of Congress, objected last summer to the release of some emails that intelligence officials had claimed included classified information. Friday was supposed to be the deadline for releasing all of the 33,000 emails from the server, but officials have appealed for an extension.

RICK JOYNER: 2016, THE YEAR OF DEMARCATION

We need leaders who will be a strong biblical and moral compass for America.

We need leaders who will be a strong biblical and moral compass for America.


Rick Joyner: The Year of Demarcation

2016 will undoubtedly be a remarkable year. If I could describe what I see in one word, it would be "demarcation."
We are entering the "Valley of Decision." Nations and individuals will be making choices on ultimate issues that determine their ultimate fate. We will have great crises to help illuminate the choices, and their consequences. These crises will have a near equal opportunity for good or evil.
To navigate this time we must have a strong moral and biblical compass, to know what is good and what is evil. We must know what we believe, resolve to live it, and stand for it without compromise.
The more clearly we see this compass, the better it will be for us. Knowledge, intelligence and wisdom can be helpful, but this moral and spiritual compass by which we know where we are going, and how to stay on course, will be far more important.
This great time of decision is coming at a time when there is a great vacuum of wise, competent leadership. This should compel us to faithfully pray for our leaders as we are commanded.
It should also compel us to take leadership whenever and wherever it is thrust upon us, always keeping in mind that the ultimate wisdom is to know that the Way is not just a formula but a Person we are called to follow. That Person is also the Truth and the Life, and He will always lead us to truth and life.
Rick Joyner is the founder and executive director of MorningStar Ministries and Heritage International Ministries and is the senior pastor of MorningStar Fellowship Church. He is the author of more than 40 books, including The Final Quest, A Prophetic History, and Church History. He is also the president of The OAK Initiative, an interdenominational movement that is mobilizing thousands of Christians to be engaged in the great issues of our times, being the salt and light that they are called to be.
http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/54796-rick-joyner-the-year-of-demarcation