Wednesday, September 30, 2015

HBO'S WESTWORLD TO HAVE FULL NUDITY AND GENITAL TOUCHING



Sexually Explicit Casting Contract for HBO's 'Westworld' Extras Has SAG-AFTRA Concerned

Background actors — extras — for HBO’s Westworld were being required Tuesday to sign a nudity and sex consent form that reads like the Kama Sutra and that has SAG-AFTRA officials worried that performers won’t realize that if they get cold feet on set they have the right to withdraw.
Indeed, cold feet may be the least of a performer’s worries.
The explicit consent form itself wouldn’t pass standards reviews at a broadcast network as it recites that the performer "may be required to perform genital-to-genital touching, simulate oral sex with hand-to-genital touching, contort to form a table-like shape while being fully nude, pose on all fours while others who are fully nude ride on your back, [and] ride on someone's back while you are both fully nude."
Less strenuously, others might simply "have [their] genitals painted."
Like all lists drafted by a lawyer, this one includes a catch-all phrase at the end, indicating that the actor may also be pressed into service to perform "other assorted acts the project may require." The imagination wanders at that phrase, but an omission from the form suggests that whips and chains may be off the table: the union contract requires advance notice of "rough or dangerous" work, and no such warning appears on the form.
Still, if any of those "assorted acts" verge on stunt work — as seems within the realm of possibility — the union contract may entitle the actor to be upgraded to principal performer, which brings with it residuals and a boost in pay.
The union agreement also requires additional payment when a background performer is asked to bring specified wardrobe. However, no additional payment is required when the performer is told to bring no clothing whatsoever.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/westworld-sexually-explicit-casting-contract-828287
My comments: America DEGENERATES into Sexual Oblivion.

DID THE UN JUST INTRODUCE A NEW WORLD ORDER?

The U.N. General Assembly inked Agenda 2030 this weekend.

Did the United Nations Just Introduce a New World Order?

Have you heard of "the global goals"? If you haven't heard of them by now, rest assured that you will be hearing plenty about them in the days ahead. 
On September 25th, the United Nations launched a set of 17 ambitious goals that it plans to achieve over the next 15 years. A new website to promote this plan has been established, and you can find it right here. The formal name of this new plan is "the 2030 Agenda", but those behind it decided that they needed something catchier when promoting these ideas to the general population. The U.N. has stated that these new "global goals" represent a "new universal Agenda" for humanity. Virtually every nation on the planet has willingly signed on to this new agenda, and you are expected to participate whether you like it or not.
Some of the biggest stars in the entire world have been recruited to promote "the global goals".
If you live in New York City, you are probably aware of the "Global Citizen Festival" that was held in Central Park on Saturday where some of the biggest names in the music industry promoted these new "global goals". The following is how the New York Daily News described the gathering:
"It was a party with a purpose.
"A star-studded jamboree and an impassioned plea to end poverty rocked the Great Lawn in Central Park as more than 60,000 fans gathered Saturday for the fourth-annual Global Citizen Festival.
"The feel-good event, timed to coincide with the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, featured performances by Beyoncé, Pearl Jam, Ed Sheeran and Coldplay."
And it wasn't just the entertainment industry that was promoting this new U.N. plan for a united world. Pope Francis traveled to New York to give the address that kicked off the conference where this new agenda was unveiled:
"Pope Francis gave his backing to the new development agenda in an address to the U.N. General Assembly before the summit to adopt the 17-point plan opened, calling it "an important sign of hope" at a very troubled time in the Middle East and Africa.
"When Danish Prime Minister Lars Rasmussen struck his gavel to approve the development road map, leaders and diplomats from the 193 U.N. member states stood and applauded loudly.
"Then, the summit immediately turned to the real business of the three-day meeting — implementation of the goals, which is expected to cost $3.5 trillion to $5 trillion every year until 2030."
Wow.
OK, so where will the trillions of dollars that are needed to implement these new "global goals" come from?
Let me give you a hint – they are not going to come from the poor nations.
When you read over these "global goals", many of them sound quite good. After all, who wouldn't want to "end hunger"? I know that I would like to "end hunger" if I could.
The key is to look behind the language and understand what is really being said. And what is really being said is that the elite want to take their dream of a one world system to the next level.
The following list comes from Truthstream Media, and I think that it does a very good job of translating these new "global goals" into language that we can all understand ...
  • Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere
  • Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency in a cashless society
  • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
  • Translation: GMO
  • Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
  • Translation: Mass vaccination, Codex Alimentarius
  • Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
  • Translation: U.N. propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave
  • Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
  • Translation: Population control through forced "Family Planning"
  • Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
  • Translation: Privatize all water sources, don't forget to add fluoride
  • Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
  • Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing
  • Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
  • Translation: TPP, free trade zones that favor megacorporate interests
  • Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
  • Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions
  • Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries
  • Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy like a mutant octopus
  • Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
  • Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state
  • Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
  • Translation: Forced austerity
  • Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
  • Translation: Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes
  • Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
  • Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors
  • Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
  • Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights
  • Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
  • Translation: U.N. "peacekeeping" missions (ex 1ex 2), the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more "U.N. peacekeeping" when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA
  • Goal 17: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
  • Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the "authority" and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the U.N.
If you doubt any of this, you can find the official document for this new U.N. agenda right here. The more you dig into the details, the more you realize just how insidious these "global goals" really are.
The elite want a one world government, a one world economic system and a one world religion. But they are not going to achieve these things by conquest. Rather, they want everyone to sign up for these new systems willingly.
The "global goals" are a template for a united world. To many, the "utopia" that the elite are promising sounds quite promising. But for those that know what time it is, this call for a "united world" is very, very chilling.
Michael T. Snyder is the publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog and author of The Beginning of the End.
http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/52333-did-the-united-nations-just-introduce-a-new-world-order
My comments: This is Precursor to the Rule of the Antichrist, which is not far away.

RADICAL ISLAM SURGES AS 'OBAMA DOCTRINE FAILS'

Radical Islam Surges as 'Obama Doctrine' Fails

In Syria, U.S.-trained rebels surrender supplies and ammunition to al Qaeda-linked insurgents. In Iraq, the battle by American-backed government forces against Islamic State is at a stalemate. In Afghanistan, the Taliban seize a provincial capital for the first time since their ouster in 2001.
Less than a year and a half after President Barack Obama used a West Point speech to lay out a strategy for relying on local partners instead of large-scale U.S. military deployments abroad, there is mounting evidence that the so-called "Obama Doctrine" may be failing.
Despite the U.S. investment of at least an estimated $90 billion in these counter-terrorism efforts, Obama has found few reliable allies to carry the load on the battlefield - and he seems to have few good options to fix the situation.
Obama also appears hemmed in by his deep aversion to seeing America drawn back into unpopular Middle East wars after pulling U.S. forces out of Iraq in 2011.
Russia's sudden moves to seize the initiative in the Syria and Iraq crises in recent weeks have stunned U.S. officials and laid bare the erosion of Washington's influence in the region.
Faced by the mounting setbacks, Obama will probably only make modest changes in strategy, according to current and former U.S. officials. That strongly suggests that Obama will leave some of the world's most intractable conflicts to his successor when he leaves office in January 2017.
"Things aren't looking good in these places and they're not getting get much better anytime soon," said Douglas Ollivant, former senior U.S. National Security Council official on Iraq for Obama and his predecessor George W. Bush.
"That's the problem of working through partners. They're not always capable."
Options could include stepping up support for Kurdish fighters in Syria, cooperation with Russia to seek an end to the conflict there, and a slowdown of the planned U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. The administration is also weighing a proposal to scale back its failed $580 million program to train Syrian rebels to battle Islamic State, U.S. officials said.
The Obama doctrine has floundered partly due to weak national governance in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the failure of moderate Syrian opposition groups to overcome their rivalries.
Still, many critics put the blame squarely on Obama for what they see as an overly cautious approach that has given the perception of a White House lurching from crisis to crisis.
The image of Obama as a sometimes passive world leader has been fed by perceptions that he has allowed the civil war in Syria to fester and has not acted forcefully enough to halt Islamic State's onslaught there and in neighboring Iraq.
Fresh concerns about Obama's Afghanistan policy have been ignited by the fall of the northern city of Kunduz to Taliban fighters this week.
U.S. officials say the Taliban's sudden gains against Afghan forces add a new dimension to discussions about whether to upend current plans and instead keep a sizeable force in Afghanistan beyond the end of 2016.
Obama and his aides have staunchly defended his approach even as problems have escalated on multiple war fronts.
"We've never been under the illusion that our strategy of partnerships would be a short-term fix," a senior administration official told Reuters. "In fact, we've always been clear this will need to be a long-term commitment."
The official took Obama's critics to task for failing to offer good alternatives.
"Is the solution to every Iraq and Syria to insert 150,000 U.S. troops? That is not something this president will do, nor is it something the American people want," the official said.
"CORE INTERESTS"
Undergirding Obama's overall strategy is a speech he gave to graduating West Point cadets on May 28, 2014.
There he carefully circumscribed the rationale for use of U.S. military force – only "when our core interests demand it" – and made clear his effort would be to "partner with countries where terrorist networks seek a foothold."
That has proven far from a fool-proof method in the fight against Islamic militancy.
On Syria, the failure of the U.S. effort to build a rebel fighting force became clear this month when the Pentagon acknowledged just four or five of the fighters were in combat.
The White House insisted that Obama was not to blame since he had always been reluctant while others, including Republican critics, had pressed him to approve the training program.
"The train and equip program was never anything but a box-checking exercise by a White House eager to be seen as 'doing something'," said Frederic Hof, a former State Department adviser on Syria now at the Atlantic Council. "'The devil made me do it' is this administration's response to policy failure."
Russia's swift build-up in Syria stands in contrast to what Obama's critics say is a reluctant, slow-moving U.S. military strategy in Syria.
"In an absence of American leadership, the vacuum is going to be filled by bad people," said Republican U.S. Senator John McCain, a frequent critic of Obama's foreign policy, referring to the gains made by militants across the arc of conflicts.
In Iraq, the Shi'ite-led government, locked in sectarian tensions with the country's Sunni minority, is still struggling to make headway against Islamic State. The security forces are trying to rebuild after melting away last year in the face of a militant offensive that captured Mosul, the country's second-largest city.
U.S. officials privately have voiced frustration with the pace of Iraqi operations, including preparations for a campaign to retake the Anbar provincial capital of Ramadi, which Islamic State seized in May.
U.S. officials have pointed to more positive results from military support given to Kurdish peshmerga forces in Iraq as well as Syrian Kurdish fighters on parts of Syria's border with Turkey. Another bright spot, they say, is progress made with local partners fighting the violent extremist group Boko Haram in west Africa.
However, in Afghanistan, the loss of Kunduz dealt another blow to Obama's policy and raised questions whether Afghan forces will be able to secure the country on their own, despite the $65 billion invested by Washington to build them up.
Critics say a 2016 withdrawal plan may be premature.
Some analysts suggested that even though U.S. warplanes had begun bombing Taliban targets in an effort to take back Kunduz, the U.S. military may not have provided enough support early enough, particularly for airlifting in troops.
Even if Kunduz is recaptured from the Taliban, "the damage is done," said James Dobbins, Obama's former Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan and now a senior fellow at the RAND Corp. think tank. "Everybody living there now knows they're vulnerable." 
(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle and Warren Strobel; editing by Stuart Grudgings.)
© 2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
http://www.charismanews.com/politics/issues/52334-radical-islam-surges-as-obama-doctrine-fails-experts

WE'RE HEADED FOR A WORLD WIDE FINANCIAL COLLAPSE

Do You Recognize These Tell-Tale Signs of a Worldwide Financial Crisis?

International stock markets wobble to a new low while prophecy experts align the economic signs with biblical foretelling.  
"We're not just headed for a financial crisis," Michael Snyder says. Snyder is the author of the Economic Collapse blog. "We're headed for the greatest financial crisis that America has ever seen, that the world has ever seen."
Indeed, CNBC reports global stock markets hover near the worst quarter the world has seen in years.  
The drop will lead to a financial reverberation so great that "America is going to be shaken to its core," Snyder says.  
America remains glued together by the grace of God, Snyder says. The clues are in these signs of a worldwide collapse. Watch the video to see more. 
http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/52345-do-you-recognize-these-tell-tale-signs-of-a-worldwide-financial-crisis
My comments: This has been signaled by the Four Blood Moons. It is the result of the Nations of the World Pursuing their godless, Socialist Utopias. This will be the Set-Up for the Revealing of the Antichrist who will offer a JUBILEE, the forgiving of all DEBT. The Price: Receiving his "mark" and Eternal Damnation!

TLC PROMOTING 'SEX IN PUBLIC'

After Nixing '19 Kids and Counting,' TLC Promoting 'Sex in Public'

The Parents Television Council urged TLC to reconsider plans to air a show titled Sex in Public, scheduled to begin on Oct. 2.
According to news reports, a therapist goes undercover and ambushes strangers with the hope of getting them to open up about their sex lives on camera.
"TLC once stood for The Learning Channel, but today it stands for Totally Ludicrous Content. Sadly, this once-noble programmer is the latest in a string of basic cable networks using provocative titles and explicit content in a desperate move to attract attention. And because TLC is part of the cable network bundle, it can use its unfair business leverage to force every cable subscriber in the country to pay for its explicit content, whether subscribers want it or not," said PTC President Tim Winter.
While this show is being touted as "therapy," the title alone gives parents everywhere pause. No doubt the network will rate the explicit sexual dialogue as appropriate for children as young as 14 years of age.
"We are urging advertisers to steer clear of Sex in Public and other TLC shows that are clearly designed to shock and accelerate TLC's apparent goal of pandering to the lowest common denominator. And we are calling on TLC to issue a refund to the 99.95 percent of cable subscribers in America who don't want to watch—or pay for—a program like Sex in Public."
For a limited time, we are extending our celebration of the 40th anniversary of Charisma. As a special offer, you can get 40 issues of Charisma magazine for only $40!
NEW - Life in the Spirit is your Spirit-filled teaching guide. Encounter the Holy Spirit, hear God speak to you, and enjoy timeless teachings on love, mercy and forgiveness.LEARN MORE!
http://www.charismanews.com/culture/52352-after-nixing-19-kids-and-counting-tlc-promoting-sex-in-public

AMERICA LIVING ON THE EDGE OF BANKRUPTCY

America Living on Edge of Bankruptcy Limits Its Ability to Invest in Others

Dr. Gary Welton | September 30, 2015 | 10:37 AM EDT
As a college student, in an era when college tuition was much lower, I was able to pay my college bills without taking any loans. First, I had the support of my parents. They paid my bill in full for my freshman year, with the understanding that they did not have sufficient resources to continue that contribution for four years. In February of that year, I started working as a part-time janitor in a middle school. I spent most of my hours vacuuming, during which time I memorized vocabulary words for the foreign language I was studying, multitasking as much as I could. I accepted extra hours whenever they were offered, which often meant shoveling sidewalks and mowing grass.
Because of transferring to a new college and changing majors, I got a bit behind in my academic work. Hence, I took an overload when I was a senior, and had to quit working. I had to go back to my parents to help me pay for the last semester, when I came up seriously short. My parents were not wealthy—my dad worked in a factory and my mom did housecleaning. They were there for me when I needed their financial support.
They were in a position to help, not because they were wealthy, but because they practiced a lean lifestyle. In today’s era, we are surrounded by media advertisements and images that suggest we should buy bigger houses and more luxurious cars, and take more exotic vacations. As a result, most people I know seem to live on the edge of their financial resources. They are one rainy day away from bankruptcy.
Unfortunately, this is happening within a larger context in which a huge number of Americans are not planning for retirement. According to the National Institute on Retirement Security, 45 percent of working-age households have no retirement savings. Not only are we running out of money at the end of the month, we are also failing to plan for retirement and declining health.
If we are unable (or unwilling) to plan for our own financial well-being, and the well-being of our sons and daughters, we are falling far short of the principle laid out by the Apostle Paul. In his letter to the Ephesians, he wrote, “He … must work, doing something useful with his own hands, that he may have something to share with those in need.” When we live on the edge of bankruptcy, we limit our ability to respond to our own rainy days; we limit our ability to invest in our sons and daughters; and we limit our ability to “share with those in need.”
The world is currently experiencing its most serious refugee crises ever. According to CNN stories, there are almost 60,000,000 people who have been displaced from their homes, with particular problems in Syria, the Ukraine, Iraq, and across Africa. “Humanity has never seen such displacement. Ever.”
"One clearly gets the impression that the world is at war—and indeed many areas of the world are today in a completely chaotic situation," said U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees António Guterres.
Syrian refugees arrive on a dinghy after crossing from Turkey to Lesbos island, Greece, Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2015. The head of the European Union's executive says 22 of the member states should be forced to accept another 120,000 people in need of international protection who have come toward the continent at high risk through Greece, Italy and Hungary. (AP Photo/Petros Giannakouris)
The Syrian crisis has received international attention this summer, with the influx of refugees into Europe, but this problem has been percolating for four years, with massive refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, and, especially, Turkey. I challenge you to locate one of the refugee camps on Google Earth (such as the Al Zaatari Refugee Camp, Al Mafraq, Jordan) and get a sense of how just one of these refugee camps looks.
Area Middle East churches have invested themselves in working in these refugee camps, seeking to alleviate the physical, psychological, and spiritual needs. International groups such as Samaritan’s Purse and Doctors Without Borders have been working tirelessly. And yet, the overall American response to this unprecedented crisis of displacement has been underwhelming. But, what can you expect from a nation that already has $18 trillion in debt? We’ve compromised our own ability to help.
In a 2012 New York Times column, former President Clinton referred to the failure of the U.S. government to intervene in the genocide in Rwanda as one of his main foreign-policy failures, saying "I don't think we could have ended the violence, but I think we could have cut it down. And I regret it."
In a few years, we will also look back on this Syrian crisis with regret. We have not positioned ourselves to help in time of crisis, because we are living on the edge of bankruptcy. I beg those running for political office to make it a priority to put our financial house in order. Let’s restore American financial solvency.
Dr. Gary L. Welton is assistant dean for institutional assessment, professor of psychology at Grove City College, and a contributor to The Center for Vision & Values. He is a recipient of a major research grant from the Templeton Foundation to investigate positive youth development.
Editor’s Note: This piece was originally published by The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College.
http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/cnsnewscom-staff/america-living-edge-bankruptcy-limits-its-ability-invest-others
My comments: It is the Lord Who gives the power to gain wealth [Deut. 8:18]. But America is in Overt Rebellion agaisnt God and His Word. In this position America will obtain NOTHING from God and will remain a Slave to her DEBT.

NOW PRESIDENT'S WARPED VIEW OF ABORTION

NOW President: Abortion 'Is an Essential Measure to Prevent Heartbreak of Infant Mortality'

By Michael W. Chapman | September 29, 2015 | 12:25 PM EDT - CNSNEWS.COM
Terry O’Neill, president of theNational Organization for Women (NOW) and a strong supporter of abortion, said there is a “premature birth crisis” in the United States that is linked to inadequate “contraception and abortion care,” and added that “abortion care,” along with contraception is necessary “to prevent the heartbreak of infant mortality.”
“We have a premature birth crisis in this country that can be directly linked to our failure to provide adequate contraception and abortion care,” said O’Neill in a commentary for the Huffington Post.
“About half of pregnancies in the U.S. each year are unintended, and for those women who carry their pregnancies to term (more than half do), the prognosis is anything but great,” she said.  “They not only experience higher rates of premature birth, but also are more likely to have inadequate prenatal care, low birth weight and small size infants, maternal depression and anxiety.”
“From a public health point of view,” said O’Neill, “abortion care, no less than contraception, is an essential measure to prevent the heartbreak of infant mortality, and to prevent another tragedy as well -- maternal death.”
O’Neill stressed that she will “continue to fight for reproductive rights and choice – but when I talk about abortion, I’ll call it abortion care.”
In her analysis about how “birth control and abortion can improve public health,” O’Neill noted that “about 11,300 infants in the United States” die the same day they were born in the United States.”
“That’s 30 infant deaths each and every day!” she said. “If that sounds like a lot, it’s because it is.”
(AP photo) 
 
According to Planned Parenthood’s latest annual report, it performed 327,653 abortions in 2013-14.  That equals about 897 babies killed by abortion every day that year. 
Nationwide, according to the Guttmacher Institute, there were 1.06 million abortions in 2011, which equals about 2,904 babies killed every day.  Guttmacher further reports that since Roe v. Wade in 1973 (and through 2011), there have been nearly 53 million abortions in the United States. 
That equals about 1.3 million abortions every year, on average, or about3,457 abortions on average every day in the United States -- 144 abortions every hour, more than 2 abortions every minute. 

http://www.cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/now-president-abortion-essential-measure-prevent-heartbreak-infant-mortality

My comments: O'Neill, Obama and the Democrats are an Amoral people, without Conscience. 

WAR ON WOMEN: 438 UNBORN BABY GIRLS MURDERED PER DAY

War on Women: Planned Parenthood Killed About 438 Unborn Baby Girls Per Day

By Terence P. Jeffrey | September 30, 2015 | 4:30 AM EDT - CNSNEWS.COM
Rep. Gerry Connolly — who represents Virginia suburbs that rank among the wealthiest communities in America because they are populated with Washington bureaucrats, lobbyists and federal contractors — is a classic example of the modern American elitist.

Or to put it another way: He is a leftist ideologue on the public payroll.
When Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards testified in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee this week, Connolly fervently attempted to present himself as a champion of women.

He did this by forcefully advocating their literal destruction. And, yes, he seemed unaware of the irony.
In its latest annual report, Planned Parenthood revealed that it killed 327,653 unborn babies in its abortion clinics in fiscal 2013. It also stated that in the year that ended on June 30, 2014 it received $524.8 million — or 41 percent of its total funding — from the government. According to the Oversight Committee, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated Planned Parenthood gets about $450 million per year in federal funding.

Nor does Planned Parenthood deny — as revealed in a series of recently released videos — that it harvests tissue from some of the unborn babies it kills.
For Americans who respect innocent life, one obvious question is this: Why is Congress taking hard-earned money from American families struggling to raise their own children in a safe and decent environment and handing it over to a group that kills hundreds of thousands of babies per year and sometimes cuts out their organs?

In this week's hearing, Gerry Connolly sought to replace this question with another: Why are conservatives waging a war against women?
"I hope every American woman is watching today's hearing, because just the visuals as well as the audios tell you a lot," Connolly said when he had his turn to question Richards.

"My colleagues like to say there is no war on women," he said.
"Look at how you have been treated as a witness: Intimidation, talking over, interrupting, cutting off sentences, criticizing you because of your salary," he said.

"'How dare you!'" he said, presumably mimicking conservatives who questioned Richards. "Who do you think you are? Making a professional salary as the head of a premier national organization. And daring to actually make decisions as the head of that organization. Lord Almighty, what is America coming to!"
"The disrespect — the misogyny — rampant here today, tells us what is really going on here," he said.
"This is about a conservative philosophy that says we are constitutionalists — that hold it up," he said, still attempting to mock conservatives. "We believe in rugged individualism and personal liberty, with one big carve-out though. There's an asterisk in that assertion, and that is: except when it comes to women controlling their own bodies and making their own health decisions.
"You would never know that the Constitution, according to the Supreme Court, guarantees a right of choice," said Connolly.

In calendar 2013, according to the CDC, 1,049 male babies were born for each 1,000 female babies. That means approximately 48.8 percent of the babies born that year were girls and 51.2 percent were boys.
Assuming the 327,653 unborn babies Planned Parenthood killed in fiscal 2013 tracked the same male-female ratio as the babies born in calendar 2013, then Planned Parenthood would have aborted 159,895 baby girls and 167,758 baby boys.

That would mean Planned Parenthood killed about 438 unborn baby girls per day and 460 unborn baby boys.
The United States suffered 58,220 fatal military casualties during the war in Vietnam, according to the National Archives. Planned Parenthood's one-year abortion total of 327,653 is about 5.6 times greater than the casualties this nation suffered in Vietnam.

Each life lost in Vietnam was precious. So, too, is each life lost in a Planned Parenthood clinic.
Planned Parenthood, right now, is waging a war against defenseless unborn girls and boys. It is denying these children their equal opportunity to enjoy what ought to be the blessings of being born in a nation founded on the principle that the right to life is God-given and unalienable.

When Rep. Gerry Connolly was mocking members of his committee for questioning Cecile Richards for her salary at a government-funded organization, he did not mention what that salary was. She did: It is $523,000 per year.
Thanks to Congress, if you pay taxes, you helped pay that salary.


http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/war-women-planned-parenthood-killed-about-438-unborn-baby-girls-day

My comments: Mr Connolly, Obama and the Democrats are Amoral people, without Conscience.