April 12, 2017
What a Christian nation should do about Syria
By Bryan Fischer
Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"
Host of "Focal Point" on American Family Radio, 1-3pm CT, M-Fwww.afr.net
Syria is a Muslim nation. This means that it cannot be reformed or turned into a democracy. It can only be contained. This sober reality should govern all our interactions with the Muslim world.
To be drawn into another ground war in the Muslim country, no matter how much satisfaction it might give to warhawks, is useless unless the goal is to subdue it, Christianize it, and govern it. Since nobody is talking about doing that, it's best for us just to stay out of there. Getting involved on the ground there will simply result in more eventual carnage among America's finest young soldiers for no long term benefit.
The purpose of our military cannot be to respond to every atrocity across the globe. Atrocities like the one we witnessed last week in Syria abound everywhere in the world. The purpose of our armed forces is to protect the American people and their security and safety. Syria represents no direct threat to America's interests, and thus I believe it is a mistake to spill American blood and spend American treasure there.
There is a moral principle involved here also, that we as a sovereign nation should respect the sovereignty of other nations. To invade their lands, unless they represent a direct threat to us, is to trespass where we have no moral right to be. At some point, unless we want to colonize the entire world,
Follow me on Twitter: @BryanJFischer, on Facebook at "Focal Point"
Host of "Focal Point" on American Family Radio, 1-3pm CT, M-Fwww.afr.net
Syria is a Muslim nation. This means that it cannot be reformed or turned into a democracy. It can only be contained. This sober reality should govern all our interactions with the Muslim world.
To be drawn into another ground war in the Muslim country, no matter how much satisfaction it might give to warhawks, is useless unless the goal is to subdue it, Christianize it, and govern it. Since nobody is talking about doing that, it's best for us just to stay out of there. Getting involved on the ground there will simply result in more eventual carnage among America's finest young soldiers for no long term benefit.
The purpose of our military cannot be to respond to every atrocity across the globe. Atrocities like the one we witnessed last week in Syria abound everywhere in the world. The purpose of our armed forces is to protect the American people and their security and safety. Syria represents no direct threat to America's interests, and thus I believe it is a mistake to spill American blood and spend American treasure there.
There is a moral principle involved here also, that we as a sovereign nation should respect the sovereignty of other nations. To invade their lands, unless they represent a direct threat to us, is to trespass where we have no moral right to be. At some point, unless we want to colonize the entire world,
we must accept the tragic reality that in a fallen world man's inhumanity to man will continue apace, particularly in Muslim lands and in the godless totalitarian lands of communism.
I believe we were justified in going into Iraq, since every intelligence community in the world, mistaken though they may have been, believed Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction and had pledged to use them against us. At some point, especially when the threat comes from the Muslim world, you have to start believing them when they say they want to kill you.
Likewise, we were justified in going into Afghanistan since the 9/11 attacks on American soil were spawned there. The blood of those 3,000 Americans cried out for vengeance from the ground.
So, while I believe we were right to go into Afghanistan and Iraq, I believe we were wrong to stay. After we had neutralized the threat – by dethroning the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam in Iraq – it was time to come on home, mission accomplished, with only a solemn warning to those nations: don't make us come back, or next time we may bomb you back to the Stone Age.
President Bush's decision to trying to bring democracy to Iraq was predicated on a fundamental error in judgment, that such a thing is even genuinely possible in a Muslim land.
Islam is not, as President Bush foolishly and disastrously believed, a religion of peace.
I believe we were justified in going into Iraq, since every intelligence community in the world, mistaken though they may have been, believed Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction and had pledged to use them against us. At some point, especially when the threat comes from the Muslim world, you have to start believing them when they say they want to kill you.
Likewise, we were justified in going into Afghanistan since the 9/11 attacks on American soil were spawned there. The blood of those 3,000 Americans cried out for vengeance from the ground.
So, while I believe we were right to go into Afghanistan and Iraq, I believe we were wrong to stay. After we had neutralized the threat – by dethroning the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam in Iraq – it was time to come on home, mission accomplished, with only a solemn warning to those nations: don't make us come back, or next time we may bomb you back to the Stone Age.
President Bush's decision to trying to bring democracy to Iraq was predicated on a fundamental error in judgment, that such a thing is even genuinely possible in a Muslim land.
Islam is not, as President Bush foolishly and disastrously believed, a religion of peace.
It is a religion of war, violence, and death and has been for every one of its 1500 years. It is dangerous to believe that Islam is simply a benign religious alternative to Christianity.
There is the further sobering reality that our interventions in the Middle East have made things noticeably worse for our Christian brothers and sisters. Saddam needed Christians because they were the only honest, trustworthy people he could find to help him manage his country.
There is the further sobering reality that our interventions in the Middle East have made things noticeably worse for our Christian brothers and sisters. Saddam needed Christians because they were the only honest, trustworthy people he could find to help him manage his country.
Once we took him out, what little protection the church had under Saddam vanished like smoke, and now the Christian population of Iraq is a fraction of its former size.
Christians in Syria know that Assad is a bad guy, but again, he had provided them with a modicum of protection and stability that no successor will. Christians in Libya knew that Gaddhafi was a bad guy, but he too provided some protection for the Christian community, protection that is completely nonexistent since we took him out.
Bottom line: our military intervention as a Christian nation in Muslim lands has only created chaos and instability, and made things measurably worse for our fellow Christians. And we have, in my judgment, been guilty of moral transgression by inserting ourselves where we have no right to be.
With regard to ISIS, our focus should be quite simple: keeping ISIS out of the U.S. That means implementing President Trump's travel ban, and extending it to include way more than six nations. It means extreme vetting for every Muslim refugee, none of whom should be allowed into America if there is even the slightest doubt about the risk they may pose. (No one has a right to immigrate to the United States.) It means aggressive monitoring of every Muslim community and every Muslim mosque, as New York did under mayors Giuliani and Bloomberg.
As a Christian nation, our sole role in Syria should be focused on getting every Christian who wants out of Syria to safety in America. Let's ask the churches of America to each sponsor one Christian refugee family from Syria, and accept the responsibility (no government dollars involved at all) to sponsor them and resettle them in America, and help them to integrate fully into American society.
As far as Muslim refugees are concerned, if Islam is, as all the elites insist, a "religion of peace," then among the 57 Muslim majority nations in the world there must be a plethora of havens of tranquility for Muslim refugees. Let's help them find a place in a nation that shares their religious ideology, while we protect the integrity of our own culture and its values.
One of the reasons so few Syrian refugees are Christians (99.5% of them are Muslims) is because the refugee camps are run by brutal Muslim forces who make such camps virtual death camps for followers of the cross.
Let's use American influence to make the refugee process a safe one for Christians who would like to flee Syria in order to live in a Christian country. Other than that, except to come to the aid of our one true ally in the Middle East, Israel, let's just stay out of there.
(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)
© Bryan Fischer
Christians in Syria know that Assad is a bad guy, but again, he had provided them with a modicum of protection and stability that no successor will. Christians in Libya knew that Gaddhafi was a bad guy, but he too provided some protection for the Christian community, protection that is completely nonexistent since we took him out.
Bottom line: our military intervention as a Christian nation in Muslim lands has only created chaos and instability, and made things measurably worse for our fellow Christians. And we have, in my judgment, been guilty of moral transgression by inserting ourselves where we have no right to be.
With regard to ISIS, our focus should be quite simple: keeping ISIS out of the U.S. That means implementing President Trump's travel ban, and extending it to include way more than six nations. It means extreme vetting for every Muslim refugee, none of whom should be allowed into America if there is even the slightest doubt about the risk they may pose. (No one has a right to immigrate to the United States.) It means aggressive monitoring of every Muslim community and every Muslim mosque, as New York did under mayors Giuliani and Bloomberg.
As a Christian nation, our sole role in Syria should be focused on getting every Christian who wants out of Syria to safety in America. Let's ask the churches of America to each sponsor one Christian refugee family from Syria, and accept the responsibility (no government dollars involved at all) to sponsor them and resettle them in America, and help them to integrate fully into American society.
As far as Muslim refugees are concerned, if Islam is, as all the elites insist, a "religion of peace," then among the 57 Muslim majority nations in the world there must be a plethora of havens of tranquility for Muslim refugees. Let's help them find a place in a nation that shares their religious ideology, while we protect the integrity of our own culture and its values.
One of the reasons so few Syrian refugees are Christians (99.5% of them are Muslims) is because the refugee camps are run by brutal Muslim forces who make such camps virtual death camps for followers of the cross.
Let's use American influence to make the refugee process a safe one for Christians who would like to flee Syria in order to live in a Christian country. Other than that, except to come to the aid of our one true ally in the Middle East, Israel, let's just stay out of there.
(Unless otherwise noted, the opinions expressed are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Family Association or American Family Radio.)
© Bryan Fischer
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/170412
No comments:
Post a Comment