Following
are two disturbing articles
about the use of the term “Federal Family.” Why are they
disturbing? Because they are exceedingly deceptive. They put forth
the idea that your Federal government is beneficent and looking out
for your best interest when the opposites the truth. This language
comes right out of the mouth of Satan. This is the same government
that defies God, His Christ Jesus and His Word. This defiance toward
God defines that which is EVIL.
Christ
Jesus said that a bad tree cannot bear good fruit
[Matthew 7:18]. A government that defies the Living God cannot bear
good fruit. However, it can masquerade as and angel of light like
it's father Satan, pretending that it is righteous. In reality
America's government is like a whitewashed tomb, which can look
beautiful on the outside but on the inside is full of dead men's
bones and everything unclean. It appears to those who do not belong
to Christ Jesus as righteous but inside it is full of hypocrisy and
wickedness [Matthew 23:27-28].
Such
language puts forth the idea
that everyone can rely on the Federal government as you would in a
family. This is the same government that is currently destroying the
American family with it's godlessness; destroying godly values;
defying God, His Christ Jesus and His Word. Ordering Military
Chaplains that they cannot pray using the Name of Jesus; forcing
Christians to pay for a Contraception Mandate that is against their
beliefs; forcing a Healthcare Law on all Americans that is against
the Constitution; spending America into oblivion; incurring a debt
that will put the next generation into poverty; indoctrinating our
children into it's godlessness and on and on.
The only One good is God. Beware of all such wicked deception from the government as you read on:
Sebelius Describes Federal Government As ‘Our Federal Family’
September
is National Preparedness Month, and in a news release urging everyone
to be mindful of potential terror attacks, natural disasters, and
pandemics, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said
the federal government is ready to help:
“While
our federal family is becoming better prepared to support the nation,
we know that being truly resilient requires the whole community
coming together,” she
said.
“Simply
put: bystanders can’t stand by. We’ve seen countless times that
bystanders are truly the first responders. They save lives. Each of
us must be ready to help others when every minute counts.”
By
Tiffany Gabbay, september 2, 2011, The Blaze
In
a creative use of language, the government may be trying to, perhaps
not so subtly, convince you of its well-meaning intentions. In a day
and age where the term “federal government” evokes feelings
of disillusionment, and for some, even disgust, the Obama
administration is opting for the softer, and evidently preferable
term “federal family.”
But
does “federal family” elicit warm, familial feelings,
or does it instead conjure images of Big Brother and 1984?
The
Palm Beach Post notes
that in the flurry of official communications surrounding the onset
and aftermath of Hurricane Irene, the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) repeatedly used the phrase “federal family” when
describing the Obama administration’s response to the storm.
The
term wasn’t coined by the Obama administration, but it certainly
seems to have taken it to a whole other level.
While
the administrations of both Presidents Bill Clinton and George W.
Bush peppered the odd congressional testimony or statement with the
euphemism (a Google search reveals the phrase appeared 10 times on
FEMA’s website during the Bush years), since Obama took office,
“federal family” has turned up some 118
times on
fema.gov, 50 instances of which include Irene-related references.
“Under
the direction of President Obama and Secretary Janet Napolitano, the
entire federal
family is
leaning forward to support our state, tribal and territorial partners
along the East Coast,” a FEMA news release stated the Friday prior
to Irene’s arrival.
“’Government’
is such a dirty word right now,” Florida State University
communication professor Davis Houck told the Post. “Part of what
the federal government does and any elected official does is change
the terms of the language game into terms that are favorable to
them.”
In
another instance during Hurricane Irene, the Obama administration
claimed it was “committed to bringing all of the resources of the
federal family to bear.”
“That
one is so blatantly obvious that I think people’s rhetorical radar
is going to go off,” Houck said.
The
Sydney Morning Herald adds
that some believe a disaster is a golden opportunity to communicate
how government can help people:
The University of Pennsylvania political communications professor Kathleen Hall Jamieson, said: ”People are performing a family-like function in a … crisis.”
But the message only worked, she said, if it was reinforced by images of federal workers managing the aftermath – in other words, succeeding.
”The question is, ‘Are we a dysfunctional family?’ ” she said.
Indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment