Understand
that President Obama's chief characteristic is that he is
anti-Christ as demonstrated by his policies and practices. He will
stand before God as such. This latest DOJ directive: “Silence will
be interpreted as disapproval,” of LGBT, is simply the latest in a
long list of anti-Christ edicts. Being anti-Christ Obama is an
instrument of the Devil. A Federal Employee can no longer simply be
silent about what they believe. If you are silent you are indicating
disapproval of LGBT and therefore your job is at risk.
A
Directive DOJ has given Federal Employees is that they are to
display a “symbol” prominently in their office indication their
approval of LGBT. Understand that this “symbol” is diametrically
opposed to God, His Christ Jesus and His Word. Employees who want to
maintain their employment must display the “symbol” or be labeled
discriminatory. This is as diabolical and anti-Christ as it gets.
Since
acceptance of LGBT is anti-Christ, this “symbol” testifies
that the person displaying it is against God, His Christ Jesus and
His Word, which is exactly what the “Mark of the Beast” does. The
person displaying the “symbol” is “marked.” Nothing could be
more Satanic than this. The day is coming soon when you must have the
“symbol” or 'mark” or you will not be able to buy or sell.
Today, Federal Employees must display their “symbol” or “mark”
in order to maintain their employment.
Satan,
through Obama, is preparing Federal Employees to receive his
“mark.” If the godless continue on their current course the whole
US population will be required to do similarly soon. The article
below explains this further:
DOJ ON 'GAYS': 'SILENCE WILL BE INTERPRETED AS DISAPPROVAL'
Exclusive: Matt Barber reveals government brochure on how to treat LGBT employees
Published: 05/17/2013 at 8:04 PM, WND
Exclusive: Matt Barber reveals government brochure on how to treat LGBT employees.
Read
more
at http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/doj-on-gays-silence-will-be-interpreted-as-disapproval/#yIA4W20b2YViyqkY.99
Under
President Obama, “justice” is anything but blind. Neither is it
deaf. In fact, based on recent revelations, it appears to be
watching your every move and listening to your every word. Still, if
you happen to be a federal employee, now it’s even listening for
your silence.
The
only thing this Obama White House seems to generate is scandal.
Well, here’s yet another to add to the growing list. In addition
to the Benghazi cover-up, IRS targeting of political dissenters and
the illegal seizure of media phone records, whistleblowers within
DOJ have contacted Liberty
Counsel to
express grave concerns over this administration’s latest attack on
freedom.
The
document is chilling. It’s riddled with directives that grossly
violate – prima facie –employees’ First Amendment liberties.
Following
are excerpts from the “DOJ Pride” decree. When it comes to “LGBT
pride,” employees are ordered:
- “DON’T judge or remain silent. Silence will be interpreted as disapproval.” (Italics mine)
That’s
a threat.
And
not even a subtle one.
Got
it? For Christians and other morals-minded federal employees, it’s
no longer enough to just shut up and “stay in the closet” – to
live your life in silent recognition of biblical principles (which,
by itself, is unlawful constraint). When it comes to mandatory
celebration of homosexual and cross-dressing behaviors, “silence
will be interpreted as disapproval.”
This
lawless administration is now ordering federal employees – against
their will – to affirm sexual behaviors that every major world
religion, thousands of years of history and uncompromising human
biology reject.
Somewhere,
right now, George Orwell is smiling.
The
directive includes a quote from a “gay” federal employee to
rationalize justification: “Ideally, I’d love to hear and see
support from supervisors, so it’s clear that there aren’t just
policies on paper. Silence seems like disapproval. There’s still
an atmosphere of LGBT issues not being appropriate for the workplace
(particularly for transgender people), or that people who bring it
up are trying to rock the boat.”
Of
course there’s “still an atmosphere of LGBT issues not being
appropriate for the workplace.” When well over half of federal
employees, half the country and most of the world still believe in
objective sexual morality (and immorality), “the workplace,”
especially the federal workplace, should, at the very least, remain
neutral on these highly controversial and behavior-centric issues.
Still,
to borrow from self-styled “queer activist,” anti-Christian
bigot and Obama buddy Dan Savage, “it gets better”:
- “DO assume that LGBT employees and their allies are listening to what you’re saying (whether in a meeting or around the proverbial water cooler) and will read what you’re writing (whether in a casual email or in a formal document), and make sure the language you use is inclusive and respectful.”
Is
this the DOJ or the KGB? “[A]ssume that LGBT employees are
listening …”? And what are “LGBT allies”? If you disagree
with the homosexual activist political agenda, does that make you
the enemy?
Yes,
in any workplace, language should remain professional, but who
defines what’s “inclusive”? Who decides what’s “respectful”?
If asked about “LGBT issues,” for instance, can a Christian
employee answer honestly: “I believe the Bible. I believe God
designed sex to be shared between husband and wife within the bonds
of marriage”? Or is that grounds for termination?
Here
are some more DOs:
- DO “Attend LGBT events sponsored by DOJ Pride and/or the Department, and invite (but don’t require) others to join you.”
- DO “Display a symbol in your office (DOJ Pride sticker, copy of this brochure, etc.) indicating that it is a ‘safe space.’”
Are
you kidding? Does this administration really think it’s legal to
compel managers to “attend LGBT events,” or to “display pride
stickers” against their will? That’s compulsory expression.
That’s viewpoint discrimination.
That’s
unconstitutional.
But
there’s more:
- “DO use inclusive words like ‘partner,’ ‘significant other’ or ‘spouse’ rather than gender-specific terms like ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ (for example, in invitations to office parties or when asking a new employee about his/her home life).”
Oh,
brother.
Sorry.
Oh, gender-neutral sibling.
- “DO use a transgender person’s chosen name and the pronoun that is consistent with the person’s self-identified gender.”
In
other words, lie. Engage in corporate delusion.
- “DO deal with offensive jokes and comments forcefully and swiftly when presented with evidence that they have occurred in the workplace.”
- “DO communicate a zero-tolerance policy for inappropriate jokes and comments, including those pertaining to a person’s sexual orientation and gender identity or expression.”
Who
gets to decide what’s an “inappropriate joke [or] comment”? I
thought we had a Constitution for that. It sure ain’t Big Brother
Barack. Sure, I get it, it’s probably better not to start your
work day with: “A lesbian, a tranny and two gays walk into a bath
house …” but still, “no law … abridging the freedom of
speech,” means no law. No matter how much Obama wishes it so, we
don’t leave our constitutional rights at the federal workplace
door.
The
DOJ edict even addresses cross-dressing man woes:
“As
a transgender woman [that's a man in a skirt], I want people to
understand that I’m real. I want to be recognized as the gender I
really am [again, you're a man in a skirt]. Yes, there was
awkwardness with pronouns at first for folks who knew me before the
transition. But it hurts when several years later people still use
the wrong pronouns. And just imagine if people were constantly
debating YOUR bathroom privileges. Imagine how humiliating that
would be.”
Tell
you what, buddy: I won’t “debate YOUR bathroom privileges” if
you return to this planet. You’d better stay the heck out of the
ladies room while my wife or two daughters are in there; otherwise,
we have a problem. Women have an absolute right not be sexually
harassed in the workplace – a right to privacy when using the
facilities. To constantly worry whether a gender-confused,
cross-dressing man is going to invade her privacy creates a hostile
work environment.
This
“DOJ Pride” directive is but the latest example of the
“progressive” climate of fear and intimidation this radical
Obama regime has created for Christians, conservatives and other
values-oriented folks, both within and without the workplace.
I’m
just glad the wheels are finally coming off.
No comments:
Post a Comment